[07:28] <slyon> ijohnson[m]: I replied to https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1938819
[07:51] <mvo> thanks for this slyon
[08:31] <rbasak> bdmurray: your python-apt upload to Focal is missing a bug reference. Is this a special upload somehow or was that just a mistake?
[12:27] <ijohnson[m]> thanks slyon for the feedback
[13:24] <jawn-smith> xnox: u-boot with the new openSBI dependency and postinst script is in focal-proposed now
[13:28] <sil2100> klebers: ^ can we get the riscv kernel default meta switched to 5.11?
[13:28] <sil2100> Or do you want to wait with the switch until u-boot is in -updates?
[13:29] <sil2100> Ah, guess we decided we'll be switching anyway this week, right?
[14:07] <xnox> sil2100:  it should be prudent enough to add Breaks: u-boot-menu (<< version), u-boot-sifive (<< version) on the kernel meta, such that people who are upgrading, do it in the right order or everything together.
[14:07] <xnox> especially if we again push kernel to security, without pushing u-boot-menu and u-boot to security
[14:53] <bdmurray> rbasak: Its a special upload for the 20.04.3 point release its also documented here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#ubuntu-release-upgrader_and_python-apt
[14:59] <rbasak> bdmurray: ah thanks. I'll review shortly then assuming you're looking for that.
[15:00] <rbasak> bdmurray: without an SRU bug, what's the expectation around verification then?
[15:00] <bdmurray> rbasak: I believe sil2100 already accepted them
[15:00] <rbasak> Are we accepting and releasing all together?
[15:00] <rbasak> Ah, OK.
[17:58] <bdmurray> coreycb: Have you had a chance to look at python-eventlet and bug 1938836?
[17:59] <coreycb> bdmurray: suprisingly I'm looking right now
[17:59] <bdmurray> coreycb: its still morning in my TZ so I think you are good
[18:51] <coreycb> bdmurray: there's a pretty simple patch I can pick to gunicorn for this https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/commit/6a8ebb4844b2f28596ffe7421eb9f7d08c8dc4d8
[18:52] <coreycb> bdmurray: unless we want to keep in sync with debian
[18:53] <bdmurray> coreycb: Right, I think that's the patch I tested. For python-eventlet to migrated we'd need to patch gunicorn. So is the new python-eventlet important enough to get us out of sync?
[18:54] <bdmurray> Yes, that is the same patch I tested.
[18:55] <coreycb> bdmurray: I don't know that it is that important. upstream is testing with that version but that doesn't mean we have to be there. It's a small delta too from what we were at so if needed we could always pick patches to eventlet.
[19:00] <bdmurray> coreycb: okay, I'll leave it up to you since gunicorn is a package the openstack team is subscribed to
[19:02] <coreycb> bdmurray: let's drop eventlet
[19:04] <bdmurray> coreycb: okay, we'll need an AA to remove it from -proposed
[19:05] <coreycb> bdmurray: i'll put a request in
[23:21] <bdmurray> laney, juliank: Why is there a very old version of boxer-data listed here? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/boxer-data/impish/amd64 The test date is before impish was opened for development