/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/08/04/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [1.187.16]03:19
RAOFHuh!06:45
RAOFReviewing linux-firmware for hirsute, the diff at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/551304131/linux-firmware_1.197.2_1.197.3.diff.gz differs from the diff presented by sru-review.06:46
RAOFSpecifically, the sru-review diff drops a bunch of the changes?06:47
RAOFAnyone else seen that before?06:47
RAOF(Specifically, it has dropped all the "binary files ..../amdgpu/..." lines, while keeping those lines for the mediatek firmware files)06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.197.3]06:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-magnumclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.11.0-0ubuntu5]08:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab to langpack in focal08:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab-base to langpack in focal08:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab to langpack in focal08:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab-base to langpack in focal08:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magnumclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.11.0-0ubuntu5]08:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-maps [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-1ubuntu1]08:58
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  not giving up on RRR:no => suspecting something in dh_strip now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debugedit/+bug/193888610:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1938886 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit" [Undecided, New]10:04
LocutusOfBorgxnox, merging src:rpm will make debugedit go in sync with debian...10:05
LocutusOfBorgmaybe we can try that?10:05
LocutusOfBorgoh no, we removed debugedit from rpm, in our delta :/10:06
LocutusOfBorgwell lets do the merge anyway10:07
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  i think we use the one from debugedit package, not the one from rpm package?! or vice versa? we have two of them.10:29
=== doko_ is now known as doko
dokoLocutusOfBorg, xnox: yes, merge is needed. the next upstream rpm should use the split-out debugedit10:30
dokoRPM 4.17.0 BETA1 released! (Jun 22 2021), so not yet10:31
LocutusOfBorgok doko yes merge already done, we got some 3 CVE fixed from debian upload10:33
LocutusOfBorgbut no new rpm release10:33
ginggsi happened to see debugedit 5.0 was released on 2021-07-2610:33
LocutusOfBorglooking at the differences between debugedit in rpm and in split out package, nothing so different...10:33
LocutusOfBorglet see if new release has something interesting10:33
dokowell, the interesting think is the split, so it can be used in non-rpm environments without rpm10:34
LocutusOfBorgdoko, I mean some "hey we accidentally lost SUID bits in previous releases, fixed in 5.0" or similar :)10:34
LocutusOfBorgcan I update debugedit to 5.0^10:35
dokosure10:36
LocutusOfBorg    debugedit: check write to list_file succeeds10:36
LocutusOfBorg    10:36
LocutusOfBorg    We didn't check, or ignored, errors writing to the list_file. Always10:36
LocutusOfBorg    produce an error if we cannot write to the list_file.10:36
LocutusOfBorgthis is what I need that is in 5.010:36
LocutusOfBorgxnox, ^^10:36
LocutusOfBorgat least the tool now should error out if something fails during chmod10:37
LocutusOfBorg    debugedit: Report errors if we cannot chmod the file.10:37
LocutusOfBorg    10:37
LocutusOfBorg            * tools/debugedit.c (main): Check result of chmod and call error10:37
LocutusOfBorg            if necessary.10:37
LocutusOfBorgxnox, would you mind doing another test once new debugedit publishes?10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.35 => 1:20.04.36] (core)13:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:3.38.5-1ubuntu2]13:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0ubuntu0.20.04.6]13:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.36]13:16
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  will do!14:08
LocutusOfBorgshould be available in proposed pocket now14:08
=== didrocks1 is now known as didrocks
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5.3 => 11ubuntu5.4] (core, i386-whitelist)15:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.26 => 2.664.27] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)15:37
sil2100bdmurray: a quick small fix for the iot parts, sorry for missing this earlier! ^15:37
sil2100Oh wait15:37
sil2100Will re-upload, wait15:37
sil2100Ok, next upload will be the one15:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.27]15:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.26 => 2.664.27] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)15:40
sil2100^15:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.27]15:48
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  still nope! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/193888616:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1938886 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit" [Undecided, New]16:01
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  i wonder if it is something more weird, like setuid is not restored cause debugedit failed earlier than that and didn't leave the binary untouched.16:05
LocutusOfBorgxnox, I blame strip TBH16:53
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  i blame cat > file!17:42
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  doko: posted more comments on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938886 the more i dig into it, the more i hate it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/193888617:43
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1938886 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit" [Undecided, New]17:43
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  not reproducible in debian, because strip in debian is old which used to preserve permissions.18:32
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  and the fixes to keep permissions in debhelper are not enough to keep setuid it seems.18:32
coreycbubuntu-archive: hello, please can we have python-eventlet removed from impish-proposed? it is blocked with an autopkgtest failure and we've decided to keep gunicorn in sync with debian for now instead of patching it, and the eventlet delta does not pick up too much new.19:07
apwcoreycb, gone.19:54
coreycbapw: thanks19:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [21.10] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)21:10
vorlonapw: always happen> it certainly hasn't happened in the past.  have the nvidia ABIs just not been changing until now?21:46
bdmurraycould some archive admin (AA) blacklist boxer-data see bug 184304922:27
ubottuBug 1843049 in boxer-data (Ubuntu) "boxer-data: please keep it out from eoan" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184304922:27
bdmurrayand could that branch not be a +junk one so people could submit MPs?22:29

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!