[03:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [1.187.16]
[06:45] <RAOF> Huh!
[06:46] <RAOF> Reviewing linux-firmware for hirsute, the diff at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/551304131/linux-firmware_1.197.2_1.197.3.diff.gz differs from the diff presented by sru-review.
[06:47] <RAOF> Specifically, the sru-review diff drops a bunch of the changes?
[06:47] <RAOF> Anyone else seen that before?
[06:48] <RAOF> (Specifically, it has dropped all the "binary files ..../amdgpu/..." lines, while keeping those lines for the mediatek firmware files)
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.197.3]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-magnumclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.11.0-0ubuntu5]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab to langpack in focal
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-kab-base to langpack in focal
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab to langpack in focal
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-kab-base to langpack in focal
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-magnumclient [source] (focal-proposed) [2.11.0-0ubuntu5]
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-maps [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.1-1ubuntu1]
[10:03] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  not giving up on RRR:no => suspecting something in dh_strip now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debugedit/+bug/1938886
[10:05] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, merging src:rpm will make debugedit go in sync with debian...
[10:05] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe we can try that?
[10:06] <LocutusOfBorg> oh no, we removed debugedit from rpm, in our delta :/
[10:07] <LocutusOfBorg> well lets do the merge anyway
[10:29] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  i think we use the one from debugedit package, not the one from rpm package?! or vice versa? we have two of them.
[10:30] <doko> LocutusOfBorg, xnox: yes, merge is needed. the next upstream rpm should use the split-out debugedit
[10:31] <doko> RPM 4.17.0 BETA1 released! (Jun 22 2021), so not yet
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> ok doko yes merge already done, we got some 3 CVE fixed from debian upload
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> but no new rpm release
[10:33] <ginggs> i happened to see debugedit 5.0 was released on 2021-07-26
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> looking at the differences between debugedit in rpm and in split out package, nothing so different...
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> let see if new release has something interesting
[10:34] <doko> well, the interesting think is the split, so it can be used in non-rpm environments without rpm
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I mean some "hey we accidentally lost SUID bits in previous releases, fixed in 5.0" or similar :)
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> can I update debugedit to 5.0^
[10:36] <doko> sure
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg>     debugedit: check write to list_file succeeds
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg>     
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg>     We didn't check, or ignored, errors writing to the list_file. Always
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg>     produce an error if we cannot write to the list_file.
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> this is what I need that is in 5.0
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, ^^
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> at least the tool now should error out if something fails during chmod
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg>     debugedit: Report errors if we cannot chmod the file.
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg>     
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg>             * tools/debugedit.c (main): Check result of chmod and call error
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg>             if necessary.
[10:39] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, would you mind doing another test once new debugedit publishes?
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.35 => 1:20.04.36] (core)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:3.38.5-1ubuntu2]
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0ubuntu0.20.04.6]
[13:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.36]
[14:08] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  will do!
[14:08] <LocutusOfBorg> should be available in proposed pocket now
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5.3 => 11ubuntu5.4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.26 => 2.664.27] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:37] <sil2100> bdmurray: a quick small fix for the iot parts, sorry for missing this earlier! ^
[15:37] <sil2100> Oh wait
[15:37] <sil2100> Will re-upload, wait
[15:38] <sil2100> Ok, next upload will be the one
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.27]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.26 => 2.664.27] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:41] <sil2100> ^
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.27]
[16:01] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  still nope! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1938886
[16:05] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  i wonder if it is something more weird, like setuid is not restored cause debugedit failed earlier than that and didn't leave the binary untouched.
[16:53] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, I blame strip TBH
[17:42] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  i blame cat > file!
[17:43] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  doko: posted more comments on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938886 the more i dig into it, the more i hate it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1938886
[18:32] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  not reproducible in debian, because strip in debian is old which used to preserve permissions.
[18:32] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  and the fixes to keep permissions in debhelper are not enough to keep setuid it seems.
[19:07] <coreycb> ubuntu-archive: hello, please can we have python-eventlet removed from impish-proposed? it is blocked with an autopkgtest failure and we've decided to keep gunicorn in sync with debian for now instead of patching it, and the eventlet delta does not pick up too much new.
[19:54] <apw> coreycb, gone.
[19:54] <coreycb> apw: thanks
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-wallpapers [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [21.10] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[21:46] <vorlon> apw: always happen> it certainly hasn't happened in the past.  have the nvidia ABIs just not been changing until now?
[22:27] <bdmurray> could some archive admin (AA) blacklist boxer-data see bug 1843049
[22:29] <bdmurray> and could that branch not be a +junk one so people could submit MPs?