[16:13] <sil2100> GunnarHj: hey! I think we're looking good-enough to just be able to release the current -proposed langpacks for focal, right?
[18:40] <dbungert> I'm looking at a merge-o-matic for libxcrypt.  The only change since the last merge is a fix for the architecture alpha.  Is there motivation to merge it anyway, or just skip it for now and merge next time to reduce package chrun?
[18:41] <jawn-smith> Is any core dev available to restart a test? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=arm64&package=livecd-rootfs&trigger=make-dfsg/4.3-4.1
[18:46] <mdeslaur> jawn-smith: done
[18:46] <bdmurray> dbungert: well you did put some time into researching it but given that it'd require sponsorship I'd say skip it
[18:46] <dbungert> bdmurray: I'll mark it to say that we should skip this version
[18:48] <jawn-smith> thanks mdeslaur!
[19:24] <GunnarHj> sil2100: Agreed. I haven't heard any objections.
[19:43] <GunnarHj> doko: Re bug #1939413: When googling around, it appeared to me that with LTO enabled you need to use the same compiler version all the way to avoid that kind of complaint. Noticed several similar issues. Anyway, will you look into the root cause?
[22:10] <mwhudson> uh shipping libraries with LTO data in sounds a bit crazy
[22:10] <mwhudson> but i am not here
[22:10]  * mwhudson goes away