[08:11] <sil2100> xnox: hello! Could you verify https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1936370 so we can get it migrated into -updates soonish? Thank you!
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, hello, should the chmod debhelper patch be now forwarded in Debian too?
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> new binutils is now in sid
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.12 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.13] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-2ubuntu2 => 7.0.0-2ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[12:29] <cpaelzer> hi ubuntu-release - I've filed a test hint at https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/407175 and would appreciate if someone had the time to look at it
[12:32] <sil2100> cpaelzer: looking
[12:37] <sil2100> o/
[12:59] <cpaelzer> thank you sil2100
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.27 => 2.664.28] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[13:55] <icey> hey - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1927868 has been verification-done for focal and hirsute for almost a week now,  and has been in -proposed for a couple of weeks now; it's fairly urgent because the only recovery is to restart things when it breaks
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-os-resource-classes to openstack in bionic
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-oslo.limit to openstack in bionic
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-os-resource-classes to openstack in focal
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-oslo.limit to openstack in focal
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-oslo.limit to openstack in hirsute
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-oslo.limit to openstack in impish
[14:27] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! So the new livecd-rootfs that went into the queue just now should be good to review
[14:27] <sil2100> I rejected the old one since it had all the -proposed changes in .changes as well
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.28]
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.27 => 2.664.28] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [s390x] (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:14] <bdmurray> icey: that's not showing up as verified b/c the tags should be verification-done-focal not verification-focal-done.
[15:14] <bdmurray> icey: I'll look at releasing it today though
[15:14] <icey> bdmurray: sigh - isn't it fun when verifiers mess up the tags; I'll update the tags too,  and thanks!
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:34] <laney> sil2100: I'm upgrading prod
[16:40] <laney> done, please try it
[17:04] <bdmurray> xnox: is there a reason intel-microcode and and64-microcode weren't added to ship (for server)? Bug 1386257 was referenced when this was added to ship-live?
[17:06] <bdmurray> vorlon: Do you know anything about the history here? ^^
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [armhf] (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [arm64] (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.12 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu12.13] (core, kernel-dkms)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-3] (kubuntu)
[20:00] <jawn-smith> sil2100 or possibly mwhudson: I see that the --make-rslave fix was reverted from livecd-rootfs in focal with a note about failing autopkgtests. Do we have any ideas for a long-term solution for that?
[20:06] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: figuring out why the autopkgtests failed? ;-)
[20:07] <jawn-smith> well, that makes sense
[20:12] <bdmurray> I'd like to see that --make-rslave fix get landed
[20:13] <jawn-smith> I would as well. I was mostly asking to see if they had investigated the failing tests at all or if that was something I should look into.
[20:15] <bdmurray> I think sil2100 did look into it a bit
[20:24] <Ukikie> An RC bug was filed for charybdis to keep it out of bullseye, this doesn't translate to Ubuntu.  Does an RM bug need to be filed or can one just ping archive-admins with Debian #981009?
[20:41] <bdmurray> pinging an archive admin should be sufficient
[21:13] <jawn-smith> I'll take astropy vs glibc
[21:18] <ginggs> seems util-linux migrated after retrying all the autopkgtest things
[21:19]  * ginggs looking at deal.ii vs glibs
[21:33] <vorlon> bdmurray: no, I don't recall any history on the microcode packages and the specific seeds they were added to
[21:34] <mwhudson> jawn-smith: fwiw astropy is a stupid upstream test that is nothing to do with glibc but it would be good to fix :)
[22:29] <bdmurray> mwhudson: Do you understand the difference between the .list and .manifest files for an iso?
[22:31] <bdmurray> The microcode packages in both files for Impish but only in the .list for Focal
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.28]
[22:52] <mwhudson> bdmurray: no.
[22:52] <mwhudson> i think ubiquity might use the .list files?
[22:53] <mwhudson> oh no, it does something with the .manifest files
[23:18] <vorlon> the .manifest is the list of packages+versions in the squashfs; the .list is a list of file contents of the isofs
[23:44] <bdmurray> vorlon: okay so then it is a problem that the microcode files are not in the .manifest for the focal images