=== Eickmeyer_ is now known as Eickmeyer === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [06:51] good morning and hello, could someone please review/accept https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1940556 [06:51] Launchpad bug 1940556 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) "FFe: libreoffice 7.2.0 for impish" [High, In Progress] [08:01] sil2100: i'd like to fix the diffutils ftbfs by uploading the new release, do you think it needs a FFe? here are the release notes https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=10031 [08:58] mwhudson: hey! Tricky question, so I see there is a small feature modification mentioned, although very low importance. I know we all hate paperwork but maybe I'd create an FFe for it anyway, at least for tracking, and we can get it approved right away [08:59] I like us to have a papertrail just in case [09:57] sil2100: ok [09:58] i wonder how many more Essential: yes packages i can upload before release... [10:03] sil2100, hey! is the link to download the image for ubuntu server subiquity amd64 broken? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20210819.1/focal-live-server-amd64.iso [10:05] sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffutils/+bug/1940818 [10:05] Launchpad bug 1940818 in diffutils (Ubuntu) "FFe diffutils 3.8" [Undecided, New] [10:05] klebers: looks like that iso has gone, year [10:11] sil2100, hi :), do you mind taking a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1940556 [10:11] Launchpad bug 1940556 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) "FFe: libreoffice 7.2.0 for impish" [High, In Progress] [10:12] sil2100, hello, what about accepting virtualbox SRU again please? :) [10:14] klebers: yes! The url is busted ;) Is this from the tracker? I can fix that in a moment [10:14] mwhudson: thanks! [10:15] mwhudson: ...aaaand approved [10:15] sil2100: thanks [10:15] LocutusOfBorg: hey! I can try looking into that later o/ [10:15] thanks! [10:16] I would like to push this one into proposed pocket instead of the current one, contains some fixes for newer debhelper regressions [10:29] sil2100, yep, I've got that url from the tracker (http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/425/builds/235542/downloads) [10:44] huh, annoying thing: this url was bad in .1 and .2 as well [10:44] And no one noticed! [10:45] That being said, the design of the isotracker could use a revamp, since this will always be a constant issue [10:47] Fixed [10:57] sil2100, ta! :) [11:30] sil2100, I added a the download links and a test case for WSL. Can you add the build to the tracker or should I or is it automated somehow? [11:30] s/a the// [11:36] jibel: I can add it manually, for it to be added automatically we'd need the cdimage support - thanks! [11:37] jibel: does this WSL image have like a version number/datestamp or something? [11:41] sil2100, yes, it's actually a cloud image. Focal is here http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/focal/20210819/focal-server-cloudimg-amd64-wsl.rootfs.tar.gz for example [11:41] there is also arm64 but I don't have the hardware to test it on [12:08] Ok, added o/ [12:39] thanks [12:46] ubuntu-archive: Hello, can an archive admin take a look at accepting python-oslo.limit and python-pycdlib from the impish NEW queue? this will help unblock some of the openstack packages. [12:51] coreycb: looking [13:24] coreycb: do you know if anyone did a NEW review of python-pycdlib already? [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-oslo.limit [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] [13:25] Since I see no tracking bug so I don't know if anyone had any comments already or if an initial review is required [13:25] sil2100: I don't think so. should I open a bug? [13:25] No, that's fine for now [13:25] sil2100: thanks for taking a look [13:26] sil2100: ok [13:31] coreycb: this is not a problem, just wondering: any reason why the tarballs are fetched from pypi.debian.net instead of the github upstream tags/releases? [13:35] sil2100: not specifically with these packages. I have run across a few packages in the past where the artifacts on github didn't include all the needed files, so I have the impression that github artifacts aren't always a focus compared to pypi. [13:35] Ok o/ === rbasak_ is now known as rbasak [14:20] sil2100, may I remind you about the libreoffice 7.2.0 FFe [14:31] coreycb: ok, package looks good, could I request 2 small 'fixes' before we get this accepted? 1) I see the source includes ./pycdlib/backport_functools.py which is a vendored file licensed as MIT, so I guess would be nice to keep the copyright+license and 2) while at it, the first line of the long description of python3-pycdlib is a bit too long, could you wrap it around 80 lines? [14:31] ricotz: will try to get to it in a minute [14:32] sil2100, thank you very much [14:34] sil2100: yep I can do that. so I suppose d/copyright just include both licenses? [14:35] sil2100: I'll do that ^ and just use "Files:" to point to the single file for MIT [14:37] vorlon, hello, zimg on i386 please? (src:ffmpeg needs it) [14:38] shoudln't require anything difficult, its a really little and leaf library [14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-pycdlib (impish-proposed/primary) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1] [15:04] sil2100: I've uploaded a new pycdlib with the updates [15:06] coreycb: thanks, looking o/ [15:07] (sorry, in meetings now) [15:10] LocutusOfBorg: done https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zimg/3.0.2+ds1-1/+build/22006067 [15:10] lovely thanks! [15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [amd64] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] [15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [armhf] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] [15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [s390x] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] [15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [arm64] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] [15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed gcc-10-cross from i386-whitelist in impish [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added zimg to i386-whitelist in impish [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-pycdlib [source] (impish-proposed) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1] [15:44] coreycb: looking good now, thanks! [15:44] sil2100: thanks for reviewing! [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pycdlib [source] (impish-proposed) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1] [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pycdlib [amd64] (impish-proposed/none) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:12] sil2100, I am sorry to bother you again, but did you have a look at libreoffice? [19:16] ricotz: this was for an FFE is that correct? [19:16] bdmurray, yes, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1940556 [19:16] Launchpad bug 1940556 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) "FFe: libreoffice 7.2.0 for impish" [High, In Progress] [19:17] ricotz: The release team is a bit busy with 20.04.3 atm - is there any reason this needs to happen this week? [19:19] bdmurray, to be honest, yes, there will be follow up micro (bug fix only) releases coming soon [19:20] unfortunately, I missed the FF deadline by 2 days [19:21] an upstream regression for ARM builds needed to be solved [19:22] okay, I'm just trying to understand the urgency [19:25] it would be great to have this initial 7.2 feature package accepted for easier updates towards the finalisation of impish [19:26] got it [19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: request-tracker5 [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:45] aiui 20.04.3 keeping release team busy or so =) [19:46] * enyc was about to ask about testing imagis then saw https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-August/041603.html call for testing already! [19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (focal-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 12.1.6-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [20:04] hello SRU team, if anyone has cycles we have a much needed microrelease of python-oslo.messaging in the focal unapproved queue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940858 [20:04] Launchpad bug 1940858 in python-oslo.messaging (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] python-oslo.messaging stable point release" [High, Triaged] [20:09] coreycb: sarnold pointed out https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-August/041601.html -- MAY be reason for focal-unapproved backlogs at the moment, or so [20:11] enyc: thanks [20:15] was only a 'best guess' etc. [20:16] I'd like to see the virtualbox 6.1.26 's passed, which as multiverse/universe I think shouldn't affect release in any case. [20:17] enyc, I asked sil_2100 this morning about it... he will process it once he has time :) [21:26] Eickmeyer: Do you have testers lined up for Ubuntu Studio for 20.04.3? [22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.192.1.11 => 3.192.1.12] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)