[06:51] <ricotz> good morning and hello, could someone please review/accept https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1940556
[08:01] <mwhudson> sil2100: i'd like to fix the diffutils ftbfs by uploading the new release, do you think it needs a FFe? here are the release notes https://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=10031
[08:58] <sil2100> mwhudson: hey! Tricky question, so I see there is a small feature modification mentioned, although very low importance. I know we all hate paperwork but maybe I'd create an FFe for it anyway, at least for tracking, and we can get it approved right away
[08:59] <sil2100> I like us to have a papertrail just in case
[09:57] <mwhudson> sil2100: ok
[09:58] <mwhudson> i wonder how many more Essential: yes packages i can upload before release...
[10:03] <klebers> sil2100, hey! is the link to download the image for ubuntu server subiquity amd64 broken? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/20210819.1/focal-live-server-amd64.iso
[10:05] <mwhudson> sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffutils/+bug/1940818
[10:05] <mwhudson> klebers: looks like that iso has gone, year
[10:11] <ricotz> sil2100, hi :), do you mind taking a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1940556
[10:12] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, hello, what about accepting virtualbox SRU again please? :)
[10:14] <sil2100> klebers: yes! The url is busted ;) Is this from the tracker? I can fix that in a moment
[10:14] <sil2100> mwhudson: thanks!
[10:15] <sil2100> mwhudson: ...aaaand approved
[10:15] <mwhudson> sil2100: thanks
[10:15] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: hey! I can try looking into that later o/
[10:15] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[10:16] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to push this one into proposed pocket instead of the current one, contains some fixes for newer debhelper regressions
[10:29] <klebers> sil2100, yep, I've got that url from the tracker (http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/425/builds/235542/downloads)
[10:44] <sil2100> huh, annoying thing: this url was bad in .1 and .2 as well
[10:44] <sil2100> And no one noticed!
[10:45] <sil2100> That being said, the design of the isotracker could use a revamp, since this will always be a constant issue
[10:47] <sil2100> Fixed
[10:57] <klebers> sil2100, ta! :)
[11:30] <jibel> sil2100, I added a the download links and a test case for WSL. Can you add the build to the tracker or should I or is it automated somehow?
[11:30] <jibel> s/a the//
[11:36] <sil2100> jibel: I can add it manually, for it to be added automatically we'd need the cdimage support - thanks!
[11:37] <sil2100> jibel: does this WSL image have like a version number/datestamp or something?
[11:41] <jibel> sil2100, yes, it's actually a cloud image. Focal is here http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/focal/20210819/focal-server-cloudimg-amd64-wsl.rootfs.tar.gz for example
[11:41] <jibel> there is also arm64 but I don't have the hardware to test it on
[12:08] <sil2100> Ok, added o/
[12:39] <jibel> thanks
[12:46] <coreycb> ubuntu-archive: Hello, can an archive admin take a look at accepting python-oslo.limit and python-pycdlib from the impish NEW queue? this will help unblock some of the openstack packages.
[12:51] <sil2100> coreycb: looking
[13:24] <sil2100> coreycb: do you know if anyone did a NEW review of python-pycdlib already?
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-oslo.limit [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1]
[13:25] <sil2100> Since I see no tracking bug so I don't know if anyone had any comments already or if an initial review is required
[13:25] <coreycb> sil2100: I don't think so. should I open a bug?
[13:25] <sil2100> No, that's fine for now
[13:25] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks for taking a look
[13:26] <coreycb> sil2100: ok
[13:31] <sil2100> coreycb: this is not a problem, just wondering: any reason why the tarballs are fetched from pypi.debian.net instead of the github upstream tags/releases?
[13:35] <coreycb> sil2100: not specifically with these packages. I have run across a few packages in the past where the artifacts on github didn't include all the needed files, so I have the impression that github artifacts aren't always a focus compared to pypi.
[13:35] <sil2100> Ok o/
[14:20] <ricotz> sil2100, may I remind you about the libreoffice 7.2.0 FFe
[14:31] <sil2100> coreycb: ok, package looks good, could I request 2 small 'fixes' before we get this accepted? 1) I see the source includes ./pycdlib/backport_functools.py which is a vendored file licensed as MIT, so I guess would be nice to keep the copyright+license and 2) while at it, the first line of the long description of python3-pycdlib is a bit too long, could you wrap it around 80 lines?
[14:31] <sil2100> ricotz: will try to get to it in a minute
[14:32] <ricotz> sil2100, thank you very much
[14:34] <coreycb> sil2100: yep I can do that. so I suppose d/copyright just include both licenses?
[14:35] <coreycb> sil2100: I'll do that ^ and just use "Files:" to point to the single file for MIT
[14:37] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, zimg on i386 please? (src:ffmpeg needs it)
[14:38] <LocutusOfBorg> shoudln't require anything difficult, its a really little and leaf library
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-pycdlib (impish-proposed/primary) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:04] <coreycb> sil2100: I've uploaded a new pycdlib with the updates
[15:06] <sil2100> coreycb: thanks, looking o/
[15:07] <sil2100> (sorry, in meetings now)
[15:10] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zimg/3.0.2+ds1-1/+build/22006067
[15:10] <LocutusOfBorg> lovely thanks!
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ffmpeg [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [amd64] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [armhf] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [s390x] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [arm64] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ffmpeg [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [7:4.4-5ubuntu1]
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed gcc-10-cross from i386-whitelist in impish
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added zimg to i386-whitelist in impish
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-pycdlib [source] (impish-proposed) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:44] <sil2100> coreycb: looking good now, thanks!
[15:44] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks for reviewing!
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pycdlib [source] (impish-proposed) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pycdlib [amd64] (impish-proposed/none) [1.11.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:12] <ricotz> sil2100, I am sorry to bother you again, but did you have a look at libreoffice?
[19:16] <bdmurray> ricotz: this was for an FFE is that correct?
[19:16] <ricotz> bdmurray, yes, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1940556
[19:17] <bdmurray> ricotz: The release team is a bit busy with 20.04.3 atm - is there any reason this needs to happen this week?
[19:19] <ricotz> bdmurray, to be honest, yes, there will be follow up micro (bug fix only) releases coming soon
[19:20] <ricotz> unfortunately, I missed the FF deadline by 2 days
[19:21] <ricotz> an upstream regression for ARM builds needed to be solved
[19:22] <bdmurray> okay, I'm just trying to understand the urgency
[19:25] <ricotz> it would be great to have this initial 7.2 feature package accepted for easier updates towards the finalisation of impish
[19:26] <bdmurray> got it
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: request-tracker5 [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [5.0.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:45] <enyc> aiui 20.04.3 keeping release team busy or so =)
[19:46]  * enyc was about to ask about  testing imagis then saw   https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-August/041603.html   call for testing already!
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.messaging (focal-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 12.1.6-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[20:04] <coreycb> hello SRU team, if anyone has cycles we have a much needed microrelease of python-oslo.messaging in the focal unapproved queue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940858
[20:09] <enyc> coreycb: sarnold pointed out  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-August/041601.html    -- MAY be reason for focal-unapproved backlogs at the moment, or so
[20:11] <coreycb> enyc: thanks
[20:15] <enyc> was only a 'best guess' etc.
[20:16] <enyc> I'd like to see the virtualbox 6.1.26 's passed,  which as multiverse/universe I think shouldn't affect release in any case.
[20:17] <LocutusOfBorg> enyc, I asked sil_2100 this morning about it... he will process it once he has time :)
[21:26] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Do you have testers lined up for Ubuntu Studio for 20.04.3?
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.192.1.11 => 3.192.1.12] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)