[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready
[17:17] <bdmurray> Does anybody know what carla-sella is talking about here? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/425/builds/235539/testcases/1451/results
[18:00] <guiverc> bdmurray, I believe it's the slideshow links went to 404 pages
[18:01]  * guiverc noted it too on some QA-test installs
[18:02] <bdmurray> well that's not gonna make 20.04.3 but if you open a bug we can sort it out for 20.04.4
[18:03] <guiverc> bdmurray, I suspect it's been fixed already if the correct pages were used for release notes (20.04.3 hadn't been released; wiki pages published at that point)
[18:04] <bdmurray> ah, so its that the links didn't exist yet not that the links are bad
[18:04] <guiverc> links on ubiquity slideshow; most users won't click the links it offers, a minor issue in my opinion