[06:15] thanks bdmurray :) [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [07:50] Preparing for 20.04.3 release o/ Will be switching off cdimage mirror syncs shortly [07:55] sil2100: woo [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready [08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.3] has been marked as ready === doko_ is now known as doko [08:49] sil2100, \o/ [08:51] sil2100, btw, I forgot to mention yesterday that we didn't find any issue with the install/upgrade tests (focused on the kernel packages) we performed this week [09:55] klebers: thanks1 [09:55] Ok, .3 published o/ I mean, mirrors syncing right now [09:57] waveform: heeey! Pinging about regenerating the Raspi Installer JSON o/ [09:58] sil2100, oh, good point -- on it [09:58] Thanks ;) [10:17] Waiting for the torrents to spin up a bit [10:17] But I see no errors, which is a good sign [10:37] sil2100, I note released on tracker & in flavors (Thanks!); any ETA on ML annoucement [10:40] guiverc: I'll be sending it over in the nearest hour I suppose! Will need to get it through moderation [10:40] thanks :) [10:40] Still waiting for all mirrors to catch up [10:41] There was a lot of moving around at once, since I archived images to old-images and old-releases [10:42] * guiverc asking as that's what I use for fridge :) [12:08] ...ok, announcement still in progress, mostly because of my e-mail configuration [12:08] But it's all the time on track [13:03] Announcement now waiting in the moderation queue [13:03] Should get processed soon o/ [13:04] waveform: hey! Re: the installer, do you need any MPs merged or something [13:05] ? [13:05] Ah, see it! [13:23] * enyc meows =) [13:24] ooo rpi release ... for 20.04.3 I guess aah yes [13:24] so pleased to see that all over! [13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.0 => 20210629.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) [13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (focal-proposed/main) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2~20.04.0 => 20210629.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0] (core, ubuntu-cloud) [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (hirsute-proposed/main) [20201222.00-0ubuntu2 => 20210629.00-0ubuntu1~21.04.0] (core, ubuntu-cloud) [13:46] waveform: I reviewed your MP, could you take a look? [14:01] sil2100, ooh -- good point, have I screwed up that script change ... let me look [14:02] sil2100, no ... I've just forgotten to commit the actual output of it ... doh! Pushed it now [14:16] waveform: merged! Do you remember if the changelog stuff is automatically refreshed or requires manual bzr pulling? [14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (hirsute-proposed/main) [247.3-3ubuntu3.4 => 247.3-3ubuntu3.5] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:17] erm ... I *think* automatically refreshed but bdmurray would be the one to ask [14:17] bdmurray: hey! Once you're around, can you bzr pull stuff for the changelog changes? [14:17] Yeah, I also thought this was automatic, but I don't see my morning changes [14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.11 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.12] (core, i386-whitelist) [14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.51 => 237-3ubuntu10.52] (core) [14:39] ubuntu-release: would someone please consider this FFe? LP: #1941750 [14:39] Launchpad bug 1941750 in strace (Ubuntu) "FFe: strace FTBFS with gcc 11 / glibc 2.34" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1941750 [14:44] sil2100: it is not automatic and there's a cache'ing service which will delay the update [15:04] bdmurray: sil2100: vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1939801 has been reviewed and ready to be promoted to proposed. Would you be able to action that today-ish? [15:04] Launchpad bug 1939801 in Kernel SRU Workflow "focal/linux-azure-5.8: 5.8.0-1041.44~20.04.1 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress] [15:04] I'm not kernel SRU qualified yet. ;-) [15:05] bdmurray: i can tell you commands to run ;-) [15:14] bdmurray: have you looked at the failures of sru-report to run? [15:14] vorlon: not yet, its still early! [15:14] * vorlon nods [15:25] bdmurray, for server team planning purposes it'd be helpful if we had a JJ page like https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/impish-indri-release-schedule/18540 opened, so we can start filling in the "Planned archive-wide activities" there. We've got a few server things like php8.1 that we'd like to coordinate around openssl3 and so on. Any chance you could open up an initial page (even if exact dates aren't listed yet)? [15:49] 2021-08-26 15:30:39,824 - DEBUG - Fetching Changelog: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/shim-signed_1.37~18.04.9_source.changes [15:49] Traceback (most recent call last): [15:49] File "./ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-report", line 825, in [16:14] cjwatson, wgrant: ^^ any idea why we get an HTTP 500 from this file? [16:14] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/1.37~18.04.9 shows contents [16:28] vorlon: it is superseeded and removed from disk https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/1.37~18.04.9/+publishinghistory as it never made it out of proposed. [16:28] vorlon: GC collected in error? [16:51] mwhudson: fwiw I looked at the ubuntu-server size question, and we do still have an older image on cdimage which was not oversized (though is now quite old) and the oversize issue did not happen over a snap upgrade. Also, still no core20 in the manifest as of today [16:51] mwhudson: could it be related to the ubuntu-server-minimal addition? [17:00] vorlon: the kernels looked a bit bigger to me [17:00] but not that much [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnutls28 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.5.18-1ubuntu1.4 => 3.5.18-1ubuntu1.5] (core) (sync) [20:19] vorlon: i guess that will add a little space overhead but not a great deal, i guess i can look into it [20:32] bdmurray: sru-report fixed [20:33] vorlon: thanks, speaking of ubuntu-archive-tools https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-review-versioned-debdiffs/+merge/406597 [20:36] bdmurray: posted a suggestion that might let us avoid repeating the long strings [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.13] [20:52] vorlon: its been improved === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn [21:05] blackboxsw: is bug 1915472 still relevant? [21:05] Bug 1915472 in update-notifier (Ubuntu) "ffe: update-notifier MOTD messaging updates for UA services" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1915472 [21:05] and bug 1915471 [21:05] Bug 1915471 in base-files (Ubuntu) "FFe: base-files update MOTD help text formatting" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1915471 [22:54] bryceh: here you go https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/jj-release-schedule/23906 [23:30] bdmurray: I've finally had a chance to test lp:~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/or-deps and am merging it \o/ FWIW this does fall short of my ultimate goal that the report detect which packages are removable because their (build-)deps are satisfied by alternatives, but it's definitely a step in the right direction [23:31] vorlon: thanks, is there a bug report about your ultimate goal? [23:31] no, and if I were to file one against https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive-tools it would get ignored anyway ;) [23:32] * bdmurray ignores that comment [23:33] * vorlon reads LP: #1388152 [23:33] Launchpad bug 1388152 in ubuntu-archive-tools "process-removals is really cumbersome" [Wishlist, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1388152 [23:46] bdmurray thanks!! [23:46] bdmurray, even got the dates in there, that's super helpful :-)