| mwhudson | cjwatson: til (well maybe more like yil) that pc105.tree is generated by a script you wrote in like 2006 :) | 04:37 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | mwhudson: I'm sorry | 10:45 |
| cjwatson | mwhudson: (it is all a bit dense ...) | 10:46 |
| mwhudson | cjwatson: oh i didn't try to read it! | 10:52 |
| cjwatson | mwhudson: very wise | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | mwhudson: I think the hard work was done by Matthias Urlichs in 2005 (though I have ended up maintaining that somehow) | 10:56 |
| mwhudson | cjwatson: ah yes, i hadn't even really noticed that the real work is done by a different package entirely :) | 11:01 |
| === coetzeer__ is now known as coetzeer | ||
| sforshee | apw, xnox: I've got wireless-regdb updates if one of you would care to sponsor them: bug 1941955 | 13:54 |
| ubottu | Bug 1941955 in wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Impish) "New upstream release 2021.08.28" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1941955 | 13:54 |
| dbungert | ginggs: I see you've run the vip-manager/armhf tests a few times - I ran this locally in an armhf container and the test passes there. Do you think this is related to the test env image rebuild being discussed? | 15:43 |
| ginggs | dbungert: quite possible | 15:44 |
| ginggs | vip-manager's autopkgtest regressed in release, but only on armhf | 15:44 |
| ginggs | listparser/armhf regressed as well | 15:47 |
| ItzSwirlz | Hey everyone, the Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix ISO builder is failing. I'm not sure why, and I don't want to be excluding apt packages, and the issue is base. Packages like bass-passwd are being extracted but a file already exists and it's causing it to fail... anyone got any ideas? https://github.com/Ubuntu-Cinnamon-Remix/iso-builder/runs/3465676747?check_suite_focus=true | 20:21 |
| cjwatson | ItzSwirlz: If I were you I would look at the earlier warning "W: The following is not a valid stage: 'false'" first, because I wonder if that might relate to a failed attempt to disable caching for the bootstrap stage, which might then mean that a cache is being extracted and in turn then explain why a file already exists | 20:40 |
| cjwatson | (this is just a guess) | 20:40 |
| ItzSwirlz | I guess it's worth a shot. lb has changed a lot recently | 20:41 |
| cjwatson | Also just in general I think it's often worth looking at earlier warnings/errors first, since later ones can be consequences | 20:42 |
| TJ- | ItzSwirlz: does the lack of quote marks around the --apt-options in the lb command line, vs those options contained inside "..." in the config file, cause a knock-on effect? | 21:05 |
| TJ- | ItzSwirlz: your problem is "--cache-stages false" -- sources shows it should be " \t [--cache-stages STAGE|\"STAGES\"]\n " | 21:28 |
| ItzSwirlz | uhhh... ok | 21:28 |
| ItzSwirlz | TJ-: are you saying that is what needs to go in the quotes? | 21:30 |
| TJ- | not sure! just looking and suggesting. I /think/ the man-page is out of sync with the code since "man 1 lb_config" shows --cache-stages true|false|STAGE|"STAGES" | 21:33 |
| TJ- | but the code as pasted above doesn't include true|false | 21:33 |
| jawn-smith | mwhudson: the original openssh bug was LP: #1939751. While working that I did a submittodebian, which they have since merged. So now instead of applying that patch we're just doing a merge: LP: #1941799 | 22:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1939751 in openssh (Ubuntu) "openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1939751 | 22:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1941799 in openssh (Ubuntu) "Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1941799 | 22:15 |
| mwhudson | jawn-smith: looks like bryceh beat me to it! | 22:35 |
| jawn-smi1 | oh look at that, thanks bryceh! | 22:43 |
| bryceh | heya, yeah noticed it doing server team bug triage. Hope I didn't step on any toes! | 22:43 |
| mwhudson | nope, i just got asked to look at it | 22:43 |
| mwhudson | but happy for someone else to have done it already :) | 22:43 |
| bryceh | yep cool. only thing I noticed was the dep8 tests failed for me, but possibly that's a local environment thing. But keep an eye on update-excuses. | 22:44 |
| jawn-smi1 | I had run tests on armhf, arm64, and amd64 so I think they're alright. I did the armhf tests with and without the diff we carry as well to make sure it was still necessary | 22:47 |
| jawn-smi1 | But I'll still keep an eye out! | 22:47 |
| bryceh | <jawn-smi1> ah excellent, then it's probably fine. I wondered if you might have already run them. | 22:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!