[04:37] cjwatson: til (well maybe more like yil) that pc105.tree is generated by a script you wrote in like 2006 :) [10:45] mwhudson: I'm sorry [10:46] mwhudson: (it is all a bit dense ...) [10:52] cjwatson: oh i didn't try to read it! [10:54] mwhudson: very wise [10:56] mwhudson: I think the hard work was done by Matthias Urlichs in 2005 (though I have ended up maintaining that somehow) [11:01] cjwatson: ah yes, i hadn't even really noticed that the real work is done by a different package entirely :) === coetzeer__ is now known as coetzeer [13:54] apw, xnox: I've got wireless-regdb updates if one of you would care to sponsor them: bug 1941955 [13:54] Bug 1941955 in wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Impish) "New upstream release 2021.08.28" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1941955 [15:43] ginggs: I see you've run the vip-manager/armhf tests a few times - I ran this locally in an armhf container and the test passes there. Do you think this is related to the test env image rebuild being discussed? [15:44] dbungert: quite possible [15:44] vip-manager's autopkgtest regressed in release, but only on armhf [15:47] listparser/armhf regressed as well [20:21] Hey everyone, the Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix ISO builder is failing. I'm not sure why, and I don't want to be excluding apt packages, and the issue is base. Packages like bass-passwd are being extracted but a file already exists and it's causing it to fail... anyone got any ideas? https://github.com/Ubuntu-Cinnamon-Remix/iso-builder/runs/3465676747?check_suite_focus=true [20:40] ItzSwirlz: If I were you I would look at the earlier warning "W: The following is not a valid stage: 'false'" first, because I wonder if that might relate to a failed attempt to disable caching for the bootstrap stage, which might then mean that a cache is being extracted and in turn then explain why a file already exists [20:40] (this is just a guess) [20:41] I guess it's worth a shot. lb has changed a lot recently [20:42] Also just in general I think it's often worth looking at earlier warnings/errors first, since later ones can be consequences [21:05] ItzSwirlz: does the lack of quote marks around the --apt-options in the lb command line, vs those options contained inside "..." in the config file, cause a knock-on effect? [21:28] ItzSwirlz: your problem is "--cache-stages false" -- sources shows it should be " \t [--cache-stages STAGE|\"STAGES\"]\n " [21:28] uhhh... ok [21:30] TJ-: are you saying that is what needs to go in the quotes? [21:33] not sure! just looking and suggesting. I /think/ the man-page is out of sync with the code since "man 1 lb_config" shows --cache-stages true|false|STAGE|"STAGES" [21:33] but the code as pasted above doesn't include true|false [22:15] mwhudson: the original openssh bug was LP: #1939751. While working that I did a submittodebian, which they have since merged. So now instead of applying that patch we're just doing a merge: LP: #1941799 [22:15] Launchpad bug 1939751 in openssh (Ubuntu) "openssh FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1939751 [22:15] Launchpad bug 1941799 in openssh (Ubuntu) "Please merge openssh 1:8.4p1-6 from Debian unstable" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1941799 [22:35] jawn-smith: looks like bryceh beat me to it! [22:43] oh look at that, thanks bryceh! [22:43] heya, yeah noticed it doing server team bug triage. Hope I didn't step on any toes! [22:43] nope, i just got asked to look at it [22:43] but happy for someone else to have done it already :) [22:44] yep cool. only thing I noticed was the dep8 tests failed for me, but possibly that's a local environment thing. But keep an eye on update-excuses. [22:47] I had run tests on armhf, arm64, and amd64 so I think they're alright. I did the armhf tests with and without the diff we carry as well to make sure it was still necessary [22:47] But I'll still keep an eye out! [22:50]

ah excellent, then it's probably fine. I wondered if you might have already run them.