/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/08/31/#ubuntu-devel.txt

xnoxapw, sforshee:  i think i have sponsored them all, a while ago. But we were in point release freeze. Let me see what's going on with them all again.10:06
sforsheexnox: these are new since the ones you sponsored, these are from just a few days ago12:21
xnoxsforshee:  oh, ok.13:17
xnoxsforshee:  will check and do them.13:19
xnoxmust be extra careful with community package sponsoring =)))))))13:19
sforshee:-P13:21
xnoxsforshee:  so no xenial and trusty backports. I guess i should check if we should be doing them or not.13:29
sforsheexnox: I think so. It doesn't seem like anything happened with the ones I did last time, so I didn't bother this time. But I'm happy to do updates if they will actually be used15:21
xnoxsforshee:  well, i thought i did submit them to esm proposed, but not sure if they got released. let me track down as to what happened with the last lot of them.15:23
=== genii-away is now known as genii
sem2peiehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/193993717:20
sem2peiei am supposed to test some kernel, can someone also tell me which one is meant exactly?17:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1939937 in linux (Ubuntu Impish) "ath10k: 'add target IRAM recovery feature support' breaks QCA9984 Firmware load capability" [High, In Progress]17:20
sem2peiefocal-proposed offers me as update 5.11.0.34.36 , is this also the kernel that is meant or 5.13.0-oem ?17:26
jawn-smithIs any core dev available to restart a package build? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20210805-impish/+build/2186551017:34
bdmurrayjawn-smith: looking17:37
jawn-smiththanks bdmurray. It's one of the packages that failed with Go 1.1717:38
bdmurrayjawn-smith: that's actually not something any core-dev can do17:38
jawn-smithoh I see, is that an AA thing?17:38
bdmurrayno, I think its a very small set of people - doko for sure and maybe vorlon17:39
bdmurraywhat are you trying to accomplish though?17:39
jawn-smiththe package failed when built against Go 1.17. I think it was a fluke, but wanted to see if it still failed on a second try because that would point to differences between the LP builders and my sbuild environment17:40
jawn-smithIf that is not appropriate I'm happy to just wait for the next test-rebuild17:41
bdmurrayjawn-smith: could you accomplish what you want using a PPA?17:41
jawn-smithyes, I was just thinking that17:41
brycehbdmurray, vorlon do you know if foundations or another team has backported openjdk-11 to bionic in a PPA?19:51
brycehah looks like maybe https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages ?19:54
brycehsorry I meant openjdk-1719:54
bdmurraythat looks right to me but I'm not certian20:01
bdmurraycertain20:01
brycehbdmurray, hopefully it's fine, this should save me a huge amount of time :-)20:03
jawn-smithCan any core dev restart20:15
jawn-smithhttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=armhf&package=openssh&trigger=openssh/1%3A8.4p1-6ubuntu1&trigger=chiark-tcl/1.3.4ubuntu3&trigger=cmake-extras/1.5-7&trigger=dateparser/1.0.0-1&trigger=gem2deb/1.4&trigger=glib2.0/2.68.4-1&trigger=glibc/2.34-0ubuntu1&trigger=gnome-desktop3/40.2-1ubuntu1&trigger=grep/3.6-1&trigger=gtk4/4.4.0%2Bds1-3&trigger=ipolish/20210105-1&trigge20:15
jawn-smithr=link-grammar/5.8.1-1&trigger=natsort/7.1.0-1&trigger=openconnect/8.10-2build1&trigger=orafce/3.14.0-1&trigger=osinfo-db/0.20210809-1&trigger=pandas/1.1.5%2Bdfsg-2&trigger=pango1.0/1.48.9%2Bds1-1&trigger=pgpool2/4.1.4-3&trigger=php-shellcommand/1.6.3-1&trigger=php-twig/3.3.2-1ubuntu3&trigger=postgresql-13/13.4-1&trigger=postgresql-common/226&trigger=postgresql-multicorn/1.4.0-3&trigger=repro20:15
jawn-smithtest/0.7.16&trigger=rows/0.4.1-3&trigger=snapd/2.51.1%2B21.10&trigger=symfony/5.2.6%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu7&trigger=systemd/248.3-1ubuntu5&trigger=tracker/3.1.1-2&trigger=vis/0.7-220:15
brycehjawn-smith, sure on it20:15
jawn-smithplease and thank you. Oof that separated into 3 messages20:15
jawn-smithbryceh thanks! the armhf tests did fail but it doesn't seem to be related to dep820:16
brycehYou submitted an invalid request: gtk4/4.4.0+ds1-3 is not published in impish20:16
jawn-smithand I've re-ran them locally numerous times.20:17
jawn-smithThat's probably an issue with IRC splitting the link. It's the most recent failure on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/openssh/impish/armhf20:17
jawn-smithOh actually looks like it's now ds1-3build120:18
jawn-smithfor gtk420:18
brycehgotcha, but nope the link on the page fails too.  More likely it's a newer gtk4 in -proposed20:18
jawn-smithYeah that's it20:19
brycehalso systemd 248.3-1ubuntu620:19
brycehokie that went in20:20
jawn-smithgreat, thanks so much!20:20
brycehjawn-smith, btw in case its of any interest I have a script https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/+git/excuses-kicker that generates the retriggers for a package recalculated with what's in -proposed, using a download of the autopkgtest.db20:23
bryceh(if you run into this situation very often.  I find it handy when doing +1 maintenance.)20:23
jawn-smithThat's great, thanks! I've got a +1 shift coming up here in a couple weeks20:24
bdmurrayI wonder if you really needed to include all those triggers20:25
brycehbdmurray, maybe not, but it doesn't hurt in practice since the buildd will just satisfy from -release instead of -proposed afaict20:26
jawn-smithI was thinking about that, and while I thought I likely didn't need them all I had just run the test 3 times against all of proposed20:26
jawn-smithlocally that is20:26
jawn-smithI suppose "against all of proposed" is poor phrasing. What I meant is: with --apt-pocket=proposed20:27
brycehfwiw, excuses-kicker will omit the ones already satisfied in the links it generates, but in my experience overspecifying things doesn't seem to cause extra build times or anything.20:27
=== genii is now known as genii-core

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!