[10:06] apw, sforshee: i think i have sponsored them all, a while ago. But we were in point release freeze. Let me see what's going on with them all again. [12:21] xnox: these are new since the ones you sponsored, these are from just a few days ago [13:17] sforshee: oh, ok. [13:19] sforshee: will check and do them. [13:19] must be extra careful with community package sponsoring =))))))) [13:21] :-P [13:29] sforshee: so no xenial and trusty backports. I guess i should check if we should be doing them or not. [15:21] xnox: I think so. It doesn't seem like anything happened with the ones I did last time, so I didn't bother this time. But I'm happy to do updates if they will actually be used [15:23] sforshee: well, i thought i did submit them to esm proposed, but not sure if they got released. let me track down as to what happened with the last lot of them. === genii-away is now known as genii [17:20] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1939937 [17:20] i am supposed to test some kernel, can someone also tell me which one is meant exactly? [17:20] Launchpad bug 1939937 in linux (Ubuntu Impish) "ath10k: 'add target IRAM recovery feature support' breaks QCA9984 Firmware load capability" [High, In Progress] [17:26] focal-proposed offers me as update 5.11.0.34.36 , is this also the kernel that is meant or 5.13.0-oem ? [17:34] Is any core dev available to restart a package build? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20210805-impish/+build/21865510 [17:37] jawn-smith: looking [17:38] thanks bdmurray. It's one of the packages that failed with Go 1.17 [17:38] jawn-smith: that's actually not something any core-dev can do [17:38] oh I see, is that an AA thing? [17:39] no, I think its a very small set of people - doko for sure and maybe vorlon [17:39] what are you trying to accomplish though? [17:40] the package failed when built against Go 1.17. I think it was a fluke, but wanted to see if it still failed on a second try because that would point to differences between the LP builders and my sbuild environment [17:41] If that is not appropriate I'm happy to just wait for the next test-rebuild [17:41] jawn-smith: could you accomplish what you want using a PPA? [17:41] yes, I was just thinking that [19:51] bdmurray, vorlon do you know if foundations or another team has backported openjdk-11 to bionic in a PPA? [19:54] ah looks like maybe https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages ? [19:54] sorry I meant openjdk-17 [20:01] that looks right to me but I'm not certian [20:01] certain [20:03] bdmurray, hopefully it's fine, this should save me a huge amount of time :-) [20:15] Can any core dev restart [20:15] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=armhf&package=openssh&trigger=openssh/1%3A8.4p1-6ubuntu1&trigger=chiark-tcl/1.3.4ubuntu3&trigger=cmake-extras/1.5-7&trigger=dateparser/1.0.0-1&trigger=gem2deb/1.4&trigger=glib2.0/2.68.4-1&trigger=glibc/2.34-0ubuntu1&trigger=gnome-desktop3/40.2-1ubuntu1&trigger=grep/3.6-1&trigger=gtk4/4.4.0%2Bds1-3&trigger=ipolish/20210105-1&trigge [20:15] r=link-grammar/5.8.1-1&trigger=natsort/7.1.0-1&trigger=openconnect/8.10-2build1&trigger=orafce/3.14.0-1&trigger=osinfo-db/0.20210809-1&trigger=pandas/1.1.5%2Bdfsg-2&trigger=pango1.0/1.48.9%2Bds1-1&trigger=pgpool2/4.1.4-3&trigger=php-shellcommand/1.6.3-1&trigger=php-twig/3.3.2-1ubuntu3&trigger=postgresql-13/13.4-1&trigger=postgresql-common/226&trigger=postgresql-multicorn/1.4.0-3&trigger=repro [20:15] test/0.7.16&trigger=rows/0.4.1-3&trigger=snapd/2.51.1%2B21.10&trigger=symfony/5.2.6%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu7&trigger=systemd/248.3-1ubuntu5&trigger=tracker/3.1.1-2&trigger=vis/0.7-2 [20:15] jawn-smith, sure on it [20:15] please and thank you. Oof that separated into 3 messages [20:16] bryceh thanks! the armhf tests did fail but it doesn't seem to be related to dep8 [20:16] You submitted an invalid request: gtk4/4.4.0+ds1-3 is not published in impish [20:17] and I've re-ran them locally numerous times. [20:17] That's probably an issue with IRC splitting the link. It's the most recent failure on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/openssh/impish/armhf [20:18] Oh actually looks like it's now ds1-3build1 [20:18] for gtk4 [20:18] gotcha, but nope the link on the page fails too. More likely it's a newer gtk4 in -proposed [20:19] Yeah that's it [20:19] also systemd 248.3-1ubuntu6 [20:20] okie that went in [20:20] great, thanks so much! [20:23] jawn-smith, btw in case its of any interest I have a script https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/+git/excuses-kicker that generates the retriggers for a package recalculated with what's in -proposed, using a download of the autopkgtest.db [20:23] (if you run into this situation very often. I find it handy when doing +1 maintenance.) [20:24] That's great, thanks! I've got a +1 shift coming up here in a couple weeks [20:25] I wonder if you really needed to include all those triggers [20:26] bdmurray, maybe not, but it doesn't hurt in practice since the buildd will just satisfy from -release instead of -proposed afaict [20:26] I was thinking about that, and while I thought I likely didn't need them all I had just run the test 3 times against all of proposed [20:26] locally that is [20:27] I suppose "against all of proposed" is poor phrasing. What I meant is: with --apt-pocket=proposed [20:27] fwiw, excuses-kicker will omit the ones already satisfied in the links it generates, but in my experience overspecifying things doesn't seem to cause extra build times or anything. === genii is now known as genii-core