[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gtk4 [amd64] (impish-proposed) [4.4.0+ds1-3] [00:52] hmm how do I change the branch pointed to by HEAD of a lp repo? (https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git main not master) [04:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-8.0 (focal-proposed/main) [8.0.26-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 8.0.26-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] (i386-whitelist) [08:00] bdmurray: good, it works then, thanks [08:00] once LP SSO syncing is set up, that should be fixed to sync with ~ubuntu-release [08:01] s/LP // [08:17] vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+edit (but somebody seems to have done so?) [08:17] ("Default branch") [08:29] laney, juliank: are either of you available to do a little armhf autopkgtest digging [08:29] mwhudson: yup [08:30] mwhudson: what do you need? [08:30] juliank: can you create an armhf container, install systemd from proposed, restart it and see if it has unified cgroups? [08:30] juliank: latter can be done with [08:30] [ $(stat -fc %T /sys/fs/cgroup/) = "cgroup2fs" ] && echo "unified" || ( [ -e /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/ ] && echo "hybrid" || echo "legacy") [08:31] juliank: i get hybrid cgroups when i try this on a pi4 but i think prod must be different somehow or https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1942113 just makes no sense at all [08:31] Launchpad bug 1942113 in systemd (Ubuntu) "systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)" [Undecided, New] [08:36] mwhudson: on it [08:39] mwhudson: root@test-1234:~# [ $(stat -fc %T /sys/fs/cgroup/) = "cgroup2fs" ] && echo "unified" || ( [ -e /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/ ] && echo "hybrid" || echo "legacy") [08:39] unified [08:39] juliank: ok, thanks [08:41] you might want an autopkgtest in 'hello' or something which does that, if it's the way autopkgtest itself launches the container?! [08:42] juliank: do the containers/images have any kind of strange config? [08:43] juliank: like lxc config show test-1234 ? [08:44] mwhudson: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/x6dSjfSssd/ [08:45] that all looks pretty routine [08:56] juliank: what version of lxd is running on the host? [08:56] the cluster controller runs 4.0.7 [08:57] ok [09:07] juliank: lxc profile show default? [09:07] mwhudson: it's all empty, defaultsa [09:08] ok [09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thermald (focal-proposed/main) [1.9.1-1ubuntu0.5 => 1.9.1-1ubuntu0.6] (core) [09:51] anybody aware of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/madison.cgi (backend of rmadison) being down? [09:51] it loads, but any search ends up with a proxy errror [09:51] mwhudson: https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/tools/armhf-lxd-slave.userdata?id=48714bdb52cb0bda1e347b65e553d091e9fee3e1 might be helpful, it's what is run on the nodes to set up lxd [09:54] laney: thanks [10:11] brauner: maybe maybe security.nesting is enough here [10:20] cpaelzer: I'll look into that, it worked this morning for me ... [10:22] juliank, laney: yeah it's the security.nesting that makes the difference [10:24] thank you laney [10:28] mwhudson: forgot why we wanted that to be honest [10:29] laney: someone knew it would drive me insane 4 years later [10:30] tjaalton, hello, do you plan any new llvm-12 backport? [10:30] asking because of this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-12/+bug/1935778 [10:30] Launchpad bug 1935778 in llvm-toolchain-12 (Ubuntu) "Request LLVM 12.0.1 backport to focal/updates" [Undecided, New] [10:32] LocutusOfBorg: that would be fine by me [10:32] otherwise we can just cherry-èick the change [10:32] either way is ok [10:39] cpaelzer,laney: Fixed I think, seems to have been a stale lock file for no very clear reason [10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnutls28 (xenial-proposed/main) [3.4.10-4ubuntu1.8 => 3.4.10-4ubuntu1.9] (core) (sync) [10:49] nice one [10:51] thank cjwatson [10:52] hmm - I wanted to write "thanks", but also generally thank cjwatson every now and then :-) [11:07] tjaalton, if you plan to do it, I just don't do anything :) [11:07] I mean, if in the future its on your schedule, better don't SRU now just to avoid overread [11:07] LocutusOfBorg: I don't have plans for a backport [11:08] LocutusOfBorg, hi, could you sync llvm-toolchain-13 [11:08] (still broken though) [11:10] done [11:11] thx [11:14] hm i think we need to sync ruby-nokogiri to get glibc to migrate [11:15] because the new libxml2-utils in proposed Breaks the version in release [11:16] Could some archive admin who remembers how the i386 whitelist is working document on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration how to make a source build on i386 again? [11:16] we need dbus-broker as it's a new build-depends of at-spi2-core [11:16] @vorlon, ^ [11:16] hm i wonder why ruby-nokogiri wasn't synced ages ago [11:17] mwhudson, we have the current unstable version? [11:18] oh yes, i can't read apparently [11:19] ah there is a new version in experimental [11:20] right, we just don't autosync from there [11:20] seb128: do you know anything about this package and why the new libxml2 breaks it? [11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.14-0~18.04.1 => 1.2.14-0~18.04.2] (desktop-core) [11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10~ubuntu18.04.5 => 1.10~ubuntu18.04.6] (no packageset) [11:24] regarding sync requests, there are a couple for ubuntu-sponsors https://bugs.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-sponsors/+bugs?field.searchtext=sync&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on [11:24] &field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package= [11:28] mwhudson, no idea sorry [13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: awf-gtk (impish-proposed/primary) [2.5.0-5] [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-regdb (bionic-proposed/main) [2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2021.08.28-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core) (sync) [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-regdb (hirsute-proposed/main) [2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~21.04.1 => 2021.08.28-0ubuntu1~21.04.1] (core) (sync) [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-regdb (focal-proposed/main) [2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 2021.08.28-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core) (sync) [13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.51.1+20.04 => 2.51.1+20.04ubuntu1] (core) [14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pmdk (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.10-1ubuntu1 => 1.10-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [15:48] sil2100, hi! good to see that .3 was released in time despite the respin [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.14-0~18.04.2] [15:51] sil2100, I noticed that the Impish daily ISOs are OVERSIZED (see http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/pending/) [15:52] by having a look at the ISO contents it seems that the casper/*.squashfs filesystems grew in size and number: [15:52] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nsXPGQkZVs/ [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10~ubuntu18.04.6] [15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.14-0~18.04.1 => 1.2.14-0~18.04.2] (desktop-core) [15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.14-0~18.04.1 => 1.2.14-0~18.04.2] (desktop-core) [15:54] is that intended? also: is it intended that all squashfs are "minimal"? [15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.14-0~18.04.1 => 1.2.14-0~18.04.2] (desktop-core) [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.14-0~18.04.1 => 1.2.14-0~18.04.2] (desktop-core) [16:00] cjwatson you might not be the right person to ask, but do you happen to know who manages the ddebs.ubuntu.com archive? it seems the Packages file there is slightly out of date, lp: #1942139 [16:00] Launchpad bug 1942139 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Debug symbols not available for 237-3ubuntu10.51" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1942139 [16:01] ddstreet: To a first approximation, me. Looks like there was a stuck cron job, which I've now killed, so it should catch up [16:01] thanks! [16:02] Running it manually now since why not [16:09] I think seb and I both have access to ddebs.u.c though [16:10] Yeah, I believe so [16:11] Not meaning to say nobody else does anything, just that I'm kind of a default [16:12] Steve L has access as well [16:14] Thanks for sorting it out [16:16] Hopefully eventually we'll turn it into a thin librarian frontend and adopt it into Launchpad, but that's been the plan since 2014 so don't hold your breath :) [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [470.57.02-0ubuntu0.21.04.3 => 470.57.02-0ubuntu0.21.04.4] (no packageset) [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [470.57.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 470.57.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.4] (no packageset) [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [470.57.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 470.57.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (no packageset) [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (focal-proposed/restricted) [470.63.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 470.63.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (i386-whitelist) [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [470.63.01-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 470.63.01-0ubuntu0.21.04.2] (i386-whitelist) [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [470.63.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 470.63.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (no packageset) [16:22] sil2100, mwhudson, I had a look at the latest changes in livecd-rootfs about the squashfs filesystem layers. Now it all makes sense [16:23] the difference in size is explained by a bigger linux-firmware and by subiquity now being based on core18 [16:23] which is seeded in the ISO [16:24] I think it makes sense to bump the limit for marking the ISOs as OVERSIZED [16:27] paride: to what size do you want to bump it and should it be done for all architectures? [16:28] bdmurray, at least amd64 and ppc64el, as they're hitting what we set as the limit [16:29] Speaking of amd64, the latest image is 1331365888 bytes big, the limit is 1300000000 bytes [16:30] we could make it 1.38GB or 1.4GB [16:36] paride: the current config isn't arch specific https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/mainline/view/head:/lib/cdimage/tree.py#L1894 [16:39] bdmurray, which I think makes sense after all [16:39] paride: okay, so how about 1.4? [16:40] bdmurray, LGTM [16:44] bdmurray, I wonder how those scripts get installed in cdimage-builder.internal and (I think) on ancientminister.internal [16:44] mostly out of curiosity :) [16:44] paride: I'm pretty sure its a manual pull, I'll check shortly [16:46] that would make the git conversion of that repo quite easy, with no tools to adapt [16:48] bdmurray, thanks for the size bump! [16:48] * paride -> afk [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libx11 [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.6.9-2ubuntu1.3] [17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libx11 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.6.4-3ubuntu0.5] [17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2.6] [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected thermald [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu0.6] [18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu0.6] [19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (focal-proposed) [1:14.1.0-0ubuntu1] [19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.4.0-0ubuntu1] [19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted designate [source] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.1-0ubuntu1] [20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (focal-proposed) [2:20.1.0-0ubuntu1] [20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.3.4-0ubuntu1] [20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (focal-proposed) [2:21.2.2-0ubuntu1] [20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (focal-proposed) [6.2.1-0ubuntu1] [20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.51.1+20.04ubuntu1] [21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mysql-8.0 [source] (focal-proposed) [8.0.26-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] [21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3:23.0.2-0ubuntu1] [21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu5] [21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pmdk [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.10-1ubuntu1.1] [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.14-0~18.04.2] [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.14-0~18.04.2] [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.14-0~18.04.2] [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.14-0~18.04.2] [22:39] paride: thanks for looking into that [23:02] got: 34+0: a-0:a-7:a-0:i-1:p-0:r-26:s-0 [23:02] * arm64: lubuntu-desktop, network-manager-fortisslvpn, network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome, network-manager-l2tp, network-manager-l2tp-gnome, network-manager-pptp, network-manager-pptp-gnome [23:02] for the glibc migration attempt [23:04] not clear to me why though :/ [23:04] those packages appear to be installable in impish-proposed [23:09] mwhudson: is it because ppp was skipped?