[06:37] <gnrp> hi everyone
[06:37] <gnrp> I found some resources saying that ubuntu studio works fine on a raspberry pi
[06:38] <gnrp> does this make sense?
[06:39] <gnrp> my goal is to use reaper (the DAW) to record some stuff (maximum five channels or so) and play back some videos
[06:42] <Eickmeyer> gnrp: We do not support Raspberry Pi divices. We only release ISOs for amd64.
[06:43] <gnrp> Eickmeyer: lol, ok, I'm stupid. Didn't look that far. Sorry for the noise^^
[06:44] <gnrp> I thought the packages were available on arm
[06:44] <Eickmeyer> gnrp: They are, but that's just because it's Ubuntu.
[06:44] <gnrp> ah, I get it. They are probably automatically built anyway, but no ISO? I.e., install raspbian/whatever and then install these packages
[06:45] <Eickmeyer> Ubuntu Studio isn't a separate distribution, and has no custom repos.
[06:45] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, we only target high-end heavy processing computers.
[06:46] <Eickmeyer> Ubuntu Studio is for professional and prosumer audio/video/graphics/photography.
[06:47]  * gnrp would just like to have something more silent and more dedicated than the regular desktop I'm using all day long
[06:50] <acid-bong[m]> Will US 21.10 and 22.04 have KDE only or a choice between KDE and XFCE?
[06:51] <Eickmeyer> acid-bong[m]: Having a choice of desktop isn't practically possible for an ISO. If you read the release announcement for 20.04, it said that 20.10 and onward would be Plasma. (KDE is not a desktop)
[06:51] <acid-bong[m]> i mean, a choice between 2 ISOs
[06:52] <Eickmeyer> Again, not practically possible because we'd have to introduce a whole new "flavor" of Ubuntu, which proved to be too time-consuming to maintain. Please read the backlogs in https://ubuntustudio.org/news
[06:54] <acid-bong[m]> got it
[06:54] <acid-bong[m]> cheers
[06:54] <Eickmeyer> o/
[06:59] <acid-bong[m]> > unofficial Ubuntu derivatives (those NOT listed as official flavors) are not supported
[06:59] <acid-bong[m]> does this mean that its possible outcomes of installing it to, let's say, Elementary or Mint, aren't Ubuntu's responsibility and aren't covered by Ubuntu support?
[06:59] <Eickmeyer> That's 100% correct.
[07:10] <acid-bong[m]> speaking of US installer: does it also use apt to install US-related software packages?
[07:12] <corrinado[m]> It's based on Ubuntu. Ubuntu is derived from Debian. They both use apt as a package manager.
[07:19] <Visual69[m]> Hello everybody, where I can find full guidelines to set folders for total software collection with .Appimage software packages?
 "It's based on Ubuntu. Ubuntu..." <- so potentially it will work for every Ubuntu-based distro?
[07:22] <acid-bong[m]> s/for/on/
[07:25] <rgh> acid-bong: I'd guess the Ubuntu Studio installer wants the official Ubuntu repos? 
[07:26] <rgh> You can try but it'll probably break. 
[07:26] <rgh> Btw. Check this 
[07:26] <acid-bong[m]> well, in case if they're not disabled
[07:26]  * rgh uploaded an image: (42KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/MngfdjhBCcNTvbgXnDSNWLFz/Screenshot_20210907-092438~2.png >
[07:27] <rgh> That's from the source code. So yes. It uses apt-get 
[07:29] <rgh> Visual69: ubuntu and there for Ubuntu Studio has built in support for snap and flatpak. 
[07:30] <rgh> Appimage is out of scope for this chat room. Better ask somewhere else. 
[07:30] <rgh> s/there/therefore/, s/for//
[07:30] <rgh> Wait. I was gonna take a nap. 
[07:30] <rgh> TTYL.