[08:08] <mapreri> rbasak: incidentally, now they followed up and requested something from you (or ddstreet).  did you get that mail? :)
[08:56] <icey> for my +1 right now, I'm focusing on the python-* openstack regressions
[09:54] <rbasak> mapreri: received, replied, and thank you for checking :)
[10:17] <mwhudson> icey: i don't want to be too much of a cop, but aren't python-* openstack regressions the sort of thing you'd be looking at anyway if you weren't on +1?
[10:18] <mwhudson> (excuses is actually reasonably non-terrible at the moment though)
[10:34] <icey> mwhudson: fair enough, I'll go look for something else to dig into :)
[10:43] <mwhudson> icey: i can't claim i've manged 100% of my time on +1 this week either (i'm on too)
[10:52] <mwhudson> how can i answer a question like "tell me which source packages build-depend on golang-go and build a binary packge containing a static binary"
[10:53] <mwhudson> sarnold: you have all ubuntu source packages unpacked somewhere, right? but i guess not all binary packages...
[11:10] <icey> mwhudson: I'm digging in on the fossil build failures :)
[11:11] <mwhudson> icey: cool
[11:11] <mwhudson> icey: feel free to leave suggestions for things for me to look at in here too :)
[11:11]  * mwhudson goes to bed
[13:53] <paride> mapreri, hi! I have read the minutes of yesterday's meeting on -backports. AIUI for the moment the backport/upload process still has to be discussed, so it's better for me to wait after the next meeting before I look into how to backport stuff in Ubuntu, am I getting it right?
[16:58] <kees> okay, I'm stumped. I'm seeing this on glibc updates on my impish docker images:
[16:58] <kees> dpkg: error: error executing hook 'if { test "$DPKG_HOOK_ACTION" = add-architecture || test "$DPKG_HOOK_ACTION" = remove-architecture; } && test -x /usr/share/pkg-config-dpkghook; then /usr/share/pkg-config-dpkghook update; fi', exit code 32512
[16:58] <kees> I can't even figure out where that's coming from.
[16:59] <cjwatson> kees: /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/pkg-config-hook-config?
[16:59] <cjwatson> (Can't help you with why, though ...)
[17:00] <kees> oh, yeah, that's where it lives....
[17:00] <kees> let's see if I can figure out why it barfs
[17:00] <bdmurray> is this bug 1943049?
[17:01]  * bdmurray waves at kees
[17:01]  * kees waves back :)
[17:01] <kees> still reading this bug...
[17:05] <kees> oh this nightmare again. docker can't change --security-opt flags for the "build" command. Bleh
[17:08] <Eickmeyer> Hmmm... I'm wondering if anybody has noticed this crashing on them lately: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/groff/+bug/1942974
[17:08] <Eickmeyer> Happens to me on every lintian run.
[17:09] <kees> i.e. https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/34454 this
[17:13] <kees> bdmurray: yup, confirmed, same bug
[17:18] <cjwatson> Eickmeyer: Fixing in Debian (if I've intuited the corresponding upstream commit correctly)
[17:19] <kees> it sounds like the problem is that the ENOSYS support went missing accidentally.
[17:24] <kees> bdmurray: I've updated the bug with a pointer to the docker PR that fixes this for hosts wanting to run impish's glibc.
[17:25] <bdmurray> kees: cool, thanks for doing that
[17:30] <Eickmeyer> @cjwatson Awesome. Thanks for the info!
[17:33] <kees> it's really irritating that docker's default seccomp policy is compiled in. :(
[18:04] <cjwatson> Eickmeyer: Uploaded groff 1.22.4-7 to unstable - feel free to (ask somebody to) sync it to impish once LP picks it up, if I don't get round to it
[18:04] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: Sounds good. I imagine this is in main and not universe so I can't do it myself.
[18:04] <Eickmeyer> (didn't check yet)
[18:05] <cjwatson> main, yes
[18:05] <Eickmeyer> Awesome. So, one day when I get around to core-dev. hehe
[21:28] <mwhudson> is what's going on here that the tests fail when the vm the tests are running in support avx2 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/srslte/impish/amd64?
[21:32] <juliank> mwhudson: do they really just expose like host cpu and not a fixed virtual CPU?
[21:33] <juliank> That would be ... annoying
[21:33] <juliank> I'd like to have consistent testing environments
[21:33] <mwhudson> i'm pretty sure they are not consistent
[23:47] <Eickmeyer> doko: Got a cute little bug for you: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1943189
[23:48] <Eickmeyer> Ooops, sorry for the bad ping, doko.
[23:48] <Eickmeyer> juliank: cute little bug is yours ^, patch already attached.