| === dbungert1 is now known as dbungert | ||
| === E_Eickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer | ||
| seb128 | hey there, could someone review bug #1942911 ? | 09:14 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Bug 1942911 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Support wayland user sessions for Nvidia machines" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1942911 | 09:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xlnx-kria-firmware (impish-proposed/primary) [0.5] | 10:12 | |
| slyon | Hey! Baseline testing shows that bilibop/0.6.3 regressed in release, and I'd like to ask for it to be hinted: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/408349 | 10:17 |
| mwhudson | ah i was completely confused by that | 10:20 |
| slyon | yeah. I'm not sure what triggered it. That failure didn't show up in the bileto pre-testing | 10:24 |
| mwhudson | slyon: i blame the kernel, based on no evidence whatsoever | 10:24 |
| slyon | hehe | 10:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (impish-proposed/main) [2.17.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.17.0-0ubuntu2] (core) | 10:49 | |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:7.1.5-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 1:7.1.6-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:17 | |
| fheimes | dear "releasers" could you please approve the bug-fixed s390-tools (and s390-tools-signed) for impish? (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=s390-tools) | 11:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: procps (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2.2 => 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2.3] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:22 | |
| schopin | I'm preparing an SRU for a bionic package with a GUI, and it has a component using OpenGL. The bug that the SRU fixes is completely unrelated (the program couldn't even start), but the OpenGL plotting component seems to have been broken by a mesa upgrade (if it ever worked?) | 13:53 |
| schopin | The plotting component is probably an important feature of the program (scilab), but I'm not sure of what's going on exactly. Knowing this, is it a good idea to do the SRU for the first bug, or would the release team prefer to wait for both issues to be fixed? | 13:57 |
| schopin | (side question : who do I talk to for mesa-related problems?) | 13:57 |
| ginggs | schopin: probably tjaalton | 14:00 |
| ricotz | sil2100, hi :), there is another libreoffice SRU ready, it would be great if could put it on your list https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1942894 | 14:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1942894 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.1.6 for hirsute" [High, In Progress] | 14:07 |
| ddstreet | good afternoon sil2100! if you have a chance, could you release php7.2 in b, and php7.4 in f, and systemd in b? we also have an upload of procps in f which is pretty simple, if you have time to review/accept it. thanks! | 14:25 |
| ddstreet | the systemd in b may need to wait, since the systemd in f/h had to be respun due to an OEM patch needing to be reverted (and also i think schopin and slyon have systemd bugs not verified yet, so they're not ready for release to -updates) | 14:28 |
| rbasak | schopin: speaking for the SRU team I have no objection to an SRU that makes a package measurably better and more useful to users even if some other bug remains. | 14:31 |
| rbasak | schopin: however I also think users dislike downloading large number of updates all the time, so I favour trying to collapse multiple fixes into a single SRU where possible. So it's a trade-off, but IMHO the decision is up to the person driving the SRU. | 14:32 |
| rbasak | (that'd be you :-) | 14:34 |
| sil2100 | ddstreet, rbasak: hey! I can take a look at those later, I sadly didn't do my SRU shift yet due to the librarian issues | 14:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.51.1+20.04ubuntu1 => 2.51.1+20.04ubuntu2] (core) | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (impish-proposed) [2.17.0-0ubuntu2] | 14:38 | |
| schopin | ddstreet: fwiw my focal fix has been verified, but I think there were autopkgtest regressions | 14:43 |
| ddstreet | schopin yeah i think it's still waiting for h verification too though? | 14:44 |
| schopin | oh right, I forgot about that. | 14:47 |
| bdmurray | slyon: Have you tried bilibop w/ more memory since it got killed somehow? | 14:54 |
| === mclemenceau_ is now known as mclemenceau | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dpdk [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20.11.3-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] | 15:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20.11.3-0ubuntu0.21.04.2] | 15:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (focal-proposed) [19.11.10-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 15:27 | |
| cpaelzer | thank you ! | 15:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.1] | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.1] | 15:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.51.1+20.04ubuntu2] | 15:53 | |
| slyon | bdmurray: not explicitly... I ran it locally with the default qemu settings, which provide more memory than the m1.small testrunners IIRC. But I will re-investigate and comment on the MP! | 15:56 |
| bdmurray | slyon: great, thanks | 15:58 |
| slyon | sil2100: the netplan.io SRU for bionic is needed for: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10212 – but it's not a big version bump, but only a small targeted feature backport | 16:02 |
| ubottu | Pull 10212 in snapcore/snapd "network-setup-control: add netplan generate D-Bus rules (LP: #1926442)" [Open] | 16:02 |
| sil2100 | slyon: ah! Ok, my fault that I didn't actually look at the diff | 16:03 |
| sil2100 | Let me handle that in a bit then, thanks | 16:03 |
| slyon | thanks! | 16:03 |
| tjaalton | schopin: which bug? | 16:10 |
| tjaalton | schopin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/1742894 ? | 16:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1742894 in libjogl2-java (Ubuntu Artful) "Scilab does not start after some upgrades on Ubuntu Xenial" [Undecided, Fix Released] | 16:12 |
| schopin | Not yet on LP as it cannot be triggered until I fix LP: #1870813 but basically I get an exception "Profile GL3bc is not available" | 16:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1870813 in scilab (Ubuntu Focal) "Scilab does not start on bionic and focal" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1870813 | 16:12 |
| schopin | I can work around it by exporting MESA_GL_VERSION_OVERRIDE=2.1 | 16:13 |
| schopin | And no it's not the same issue as the one you linked, the "symptoms" are different : it only triggers when opening the plot subwindow (launch scilab, enter "plot", and voilà) and it not a crash, the plot window is just blank and I get a stack trace in my terminal. | 16:16 |
| tjaalton | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886837 | 16:16 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 886837 in scilab "scilab: impossible to plot anything" [Important, Open] | 16:16 |
| schopin | yeah, looks like the one. | 16:17 |
| tjaalton | libjogl2-java is already updated for the mesa change since bionic | 16:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (impish-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu46 => 2.04-1ubuntu47] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (impish-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (impish-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47 => 2.04-1ubuntu47] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:32 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!