[05:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (focal-backports/universe) [248-1~ubuntu20.04.1 => 252-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[05:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (hirsute-backports/universe) [248-1~ubuntu21.04.1 => 252-1~ubuntu21.04.1] (no packageset)
[05:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (hirsute-backports/universe) [33-1~ubuntu21.04.1 => 34-1~ubuntu21.04.1] (no packageset)
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [252-1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (hirsute-backports) [252-1~ubuntu21.04.1]
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (hirsute-backports) [34-1~ubuntu21.04.1]
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (focal-backports/universe) [250-1~ubuntu20.04.1 => 251-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:14] <slyon> bdmurray: the kill signal in bilibop is expected and unrelated to the tests failure (triggered by autopkgtest-reboot). I think bilibop should be hinted: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/408349
[07:48] <sil2100> juliank: hey! Can you somehow verify shim for bionic?
[07:48] <sil2100> I'd like to get everything prepared to build .6 candidates on Monday
[07:48] <juliank> sil2100: do we have images built with it?
[07:48] <juliank> sil2100: we need images built with that shim and then boot them somewhere
[07:48] <juliank> sil2100: Ah, we need specific machines too
[07:48] <juliank> sil2100: So no, I cannot verify that, only Leo and Chris can
[07:48] <juliank> sil2100: Oh but I wrote "Verification is not necessary for individual SRU releases.
[07:48] <juliank> So I guess we can also just mark it as verified
[07:48] <juliank> It's not like we touched code paths involving shim-grub interaction
[07:50]  * juliank marked verification-done-*
[07:54] <sil2100> juliank: yes we do have images indeed!
[07:54] <sil2100> We have bionic dailies for ubuntu and ubuntu-server
[07:54] <sil2100> hm, ok
[07:54] <sil2100> Guess that'll have to be sufficient then
[07:56] <juliank> sil2100: It's what it is anyway, it's not like we can spin new shims now in case something new is unbootable :)
[08:05] <sil2100> True true ;)
[08:25] <LocutusOfBorg> ahayzen, hello, do you plan a steam merge? Debian applied some of the delta, the merge looks easier now
[10:09] <ricotz> sil2100, hello :)
[10:22] <sil2100> o/
[10:23] <sil2100> ricotz: hey! I remember about the libreoffice SRU! Will try to get to it today, hopefully
[10:23] <sil2100> If not, then Monday for sure
[10:23] <ricotz> I am hoping you didn't miss libreoffice :)
[10:23] <ricotz> sil2100, thank you !
[10:23] <ricotz> today would be great so it has time to build over the weekend ;)
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libdazzle from i386-whitelist in impish
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libcloudproviders to i386-whitelist in impish
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [s390x] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [arm64] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [armhf] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [riscv64] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libffi [i386] (impish-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [amd64] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [armhf] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [s390x] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [arm64] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libffi [i386] (impish-proposed) [3.4.2-1]
[14:52] <bdmurray> sil2100, ricotz: I can take a look at libreoffice if sil2100 doesn't get to it
[14:56] <ricotz> bdmurray, that would be great, thanks!
[16:27] <schopin> Looking for a sponsor for bionic and focal SRUs for scilab. LP: #1870813
[16:34] <bdmurray> schopin: there are likely to be more sponsors in #ubuntu-devel
[16:35] <schopin> Oh I was in -release? My bad.
[16:36] <bdmurray> no problem!
[17:13] <ricotz> bdmurray, regarding libreofice depedencies there is a missing (CVE) update for "expat" https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expat
[17:14] <ricotz> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expat/+bug/1943133
[17:15] <bdmurray> ricotz: is the CVE fix the only thing in the new upstream release?
[17:16] <ricotz> bdmurray, no, https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/blob/R_2_4_1/expat/Changes
[17:17] <bdmurray> ricotz: okay, then you'd need a feature freeze exception
[17:17] <ricotz> since those new upstream releases went into debian/experimental only, unfortunately they weren't synced
[17:19] <ricotz> libreoffice doesn't (hard) require a newer version, so dealing with the CVE would be sufficient
[17:19] <ricotz> I mentioned this in #ubuntu-security yesterday
[17:20] <bdmurray> Well if you produce a debdiff for the just the CVE fix I could sponsor that
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bup [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.32-3build1] (no packageset)
[17:27] <doko> ^^^ that was unintended, did retry failed builds in hirsute-proposed accidentally ...
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected bup [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.32-3build1]
[17:37] <ricotz> bdmurray, I have taken a closer look and the CVE fix itself introduces all the new API compared to 2.3.0-1, so going for the full update might be preferred
[17:40] <ricotz> seb128, hi :), I see you synced expat 2.3.0-1 from experimental back then ^
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 => 6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[18:28] <vorlon> seb128: well, update_excuses for gtk4 is really weird, it claims binaries are missing on i386 even though they were built and visible to rmadison
[18:28] <vorlon> seb128: but maybe not an issue if ppc64el also ftbfs?
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.0.1-7ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 6.0.1-7ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:7.1.6-0ubuntu0.21.04.1]
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed unifont from i386-whitelist in impish
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libdazzle to i386-whitelist in impish
[22:09] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: hi, so newly-merged ffmpeg drops libavresample-dev which has various rev-build-deps, are you going to sort this?
[22:10] <vorlon> xnox: did you come to a decision on what you're going to do with dwarves-dfsg for hirsute?
[22:28] <ahayzen> LocutusOfBorg, yup, likely in the next cycle i'll remove a couple of bits of our diff :-)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.10.9]