/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/09/16/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been updated (20210915.2)00:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been updated (20210915.2)00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Bionic 18.04.6] has been updated (20210915.2)00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Bionic 18.04.6] has been updated (20210915.2)00:07
blackboxswbdmurray: verification done on update-manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/193804303:55
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1938043 in update-manager (Ubuntu Focal) "ubuntu-security-status" [Undecided, Fix Committed]03:55
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (hirsute-proposed/main) [2:18.0.0-0ubuntu3 => 2:18.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)09:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (hirsute-proposed/main) [2:18.1.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:18.1.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)09:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-17 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [17~19-1ubuntu1 => 17+35-1~21.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: openjdk-17 (bionic-proposed/primary) [17+35-1~18.04]10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: openjdk-17 (focal-proposed/primary) [17+35-1~20.04]10:46
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, hello, is the libavresample-dev fixup correct in your opinion?11:43
LocutusOfBorgwe still need to remove src:alsa-plugins-extra from the archive11:43
paridesil2100, I'm submitting the test results for live-server 20210915 and d-i server 20210915.212:10
paridesil2100, the only bug in "current blockers" seem to be the d-i one, which should be fixed now12:13
parideis there anything else to test with special care? I'm not sure on why the .1 and .2 respins were needed12:15
paridesil2100, when you have time, I have this FFe waiting for a +1 from the release team: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/194007912:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1940079 in strongswan (Ubuntu) "Strongswan doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2 interface" [Undecided, Triaged]12:59
paridesee this MP for the diff, which can also be used to review the proposal: https://code.launchpad.net/~paride/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+git/strongswan/+merge/40873813:00
parideno hurry, I'd like to upload it to Impish before beta freeze :)13:00
paridecomment #13 of the bug is a summary meant to be the FFe rationale13:01
bdmurrayblackboxsw: thanks!14:30
dokoapw, sforshee: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish/impish/arm64/o/oss4/20210916_154339_652ea@/log.gz16:45
dokohow are you handling these dkms autopkg test failures?16:46
doko./lib/Makefile:FPU_CFLAGS += -mhard-float16:56
dokothat's set in the kernel itself. but both armhf and arm64 don't have this option16:56
dokoconfused, that option is also rejected with gcc-1017:02
apwdoko, a good question.  will pass that on to _someone_ once i figure out who :)17:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready17:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been updated (20210915)17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready17:57
arighidoko, about the oss4 dkms in impish, it looks like our testing missed to test that package with the latest kernel, so we didn't catch that error, I'll take a look at that18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-settings (hirsute-proposed/main) [470.57.01-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 470.57.01-0ubuntu0.21.04.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)19:37
sil2100Okay, I think .6 is looking good19:40
sil2100Let me quickly check the base tarball and then I'll release19:40
Nafallo:-D19:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready19:55
sil2100Ok, prepublished the images, will try to publish publish soon20:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-settings [source] (hirsute-proposed) [470.57.01-0ubuntu0.21.04.2]20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [470.57.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]20:21
bdmurrayI'm gonna reupload ubuntu-drivers-common (the 0.9.0 backport) for Bionic before we forget about it.20:40
bdmurrayvorlon: Did you remove kubuntu-patched-l10n?20:41
vorlonbdmurray: no - do you mean from the archive or from the checklist?20:43
bdmurrayvorlon: I removed it from the checklist so the archive.20:43
vorlonbdmurray: do you want to file a bug and subscribe ubuntu-archive for the records?20:44
bdmurraycan do20:44
bdmurraybug 194388220:52
ubottuBug 1943882 in kubuntu-patched-l10n (Ubuntu) "removal request for kubuntu-patched-l10n" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194388220:52
sil2100Ok, releasing .6!21:39
sil2100I still didn't finish sorting the changes, but I'll do that tomorrow21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready21:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Bionic 18.04.6] has been marked as ready21:39
sil2100vorlon, bdmurray: actually, does it make sense to release new ubuntu-base?21:42
sil2100WDYT?21:42
sil2100For now I'll leave those be21:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (bionic-proposed/main) [1:0.8.6.3~0.18.04.2 => 1:0.9.0~0.18.04.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)21:43
vorlonsil2100: don't we generally do so?21:46
sil2100We do, but is this actually affected by the revocations?21:46
sil2100Like, do we *need* to release those21:47
bdmurrayI think I got the ubuntu-drivers-common upload squared away but it was a bit of work so look closely.21:48
vorlonsil2100: ah right, doesn't matter for the revocations21:53
sil2100Ok, I think we're done! Let me craft a release e-mail soonish - if I won't make it, I'll send it tomorrow22:02
vorlonsil2100: I have a start of an archive-point-release that should at least DTRT for the simple tree, should I give it a try?22:02
sil2100I already archived everything that's needed for .622:10
sil2100Since with the archive-image tool it's basically executing, in this case, 3 commands ;)22:11
vorlonhum22:11
sil2100So maybe next time!22:11
vorlonthat's a long time away22:11
Nafallowell. depends on what bugs pop up ;-)22:12
bdmurraysssh22:12
sil2100...18.04.6.1..?22:12
vorlonwell I'm going to try to run the script anyway, because there are things not covered by archive-image and it should be a no-op if there are no images to archive22:13

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!