| mwhudson | there is a bunch of ubiquity code that talks about language-support-$LL packages | 02:00 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | when did they stop being a thing? | 02:01 |
| mwhudson | huh i guess https://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/language-support-en/ suggests 2009! | 02:01 |
| sarnold | all the datestamps on the directories on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/ suggests maybe 2016 instead | 02:03 |
| sarnold | is there a reason we don't reap the empty directories on the mirrors? | 02:03 |
| mwhudson | ah that's when they got deleted https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-support-en/+publishinghistory | 02:04 |
| mwhudson | last upload was karmic though | 02:04 |
| mwhudson | i guess they got deleted from archive.ubuntu.com when lucid went EOL? | 02:05 |
| sarnold | "Deleted on 2011-05-26 by Martin Pitt" "Removed from disk on 2016-10-31" heh | 02:06 |
| mwhudson | ANYWAY | 02:09 |
| mwhudson | long dead | 02:09 |
| sigv | if there is a package versioned 5.0.0-4 (directly pulled from Debian) and I want to get it SRU'd in Focal based on a bug - what should the new version number be? | 06:27 |
| sigv | 5.0.0-4ubuntu1 or 5.0.0-4.1 or something else is preferred? | 06:27 |
| sigv | Bionic is back on 4.6.1-1 so there is not reason for putting the 20.04 in the version for the SRU, I would assume. | 06:28 |
| Unit193 | teward: Any updates on those two simple pastebinit commits? :) | 07:35 |
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| ddstreet | mapreri teward i set 'expires' for all of us in the ubuntu-backports team, and it's self-renew once the expires date arrives, i figured neither of you would mind that | 11:55 |
| teward | Unit193: Its Simon's Fault? | 12:15 |
| teward | ddstreet: ack alls good | 12:16 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: good morning. mwhudson uploaded golang-1.17 with the risc-v shared library patches and it successfully made it into -release overnight | 14:34 |
| bdmurray | ginggs: Have you looked at the hwloc ppc64el autopkgtest failure closely? | 14:58 |
| slyon | ddstreet: what do you think about https://pad.lv/1943982 (also see attached MP to revert the change in Focal and unblock the phased updates)? I'll be working on integrating the additional relevant patches into Hirsute next. | 15:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1943982 in systemd (Ubuntu Focal) "Revert resolved-disable-event-sources-before-unreffing-them.patch" [Undecided, New] | 15:00 |
| ginggs | bdmurray: I have not, I only triggered the test in release to confirm it wasn't a regression caused by nvidia-settings | 15:07 |
| === genii-core is now known as genii | ||
| bdmurray | ginggs: ack, thanks | 15:13 |
| jawn-smith | Should we aim to get Go 1.17 in the impish beta? | 17:32 |
| jawn-smith | well, golang-defaults 1.17 that is | 17:33 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: what does "in the impish beta" mean to you? | 17:36 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: It was my understanding we were building beta images next week. So by "in the impish beta" I meant golang-defaults 1.17 in -release when those images are built | 17:38 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: but is golang-defaults in those images? | 17:38 |
| jawn-smith | Ah good question | 17:39 |
| jawn-smith | I'll check, but I think you're right that it's not | 17:39 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: you are correct, it's not in the images. | 17:41 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: out of curiousity how did you check? | 17:41 |
| jawn-smith | I conveniently have both a desktop and server image that I flashed to Pis yesterday and haven't touched | 17:42 |
| jawn-smith | I checked if it was installed on them. So not an exhaustive check. Is there a better way to check that? | 17:43 |
| bdmurray | you might want to check out seeded-in-ubuntu | 17:43 |
| jawn-smith | Ah I've used that for MIRs | 17:43 |
| jawn-smith | It says golang-defaults is seeded in ubuntu-mate | 17:44 |
| jawn-smith | or more specifically: golang-go and golang-src (which are provided by golang-defaults) are seeded in ubuntu-mate | 17:44 |
| bdmurray | it doesn't seem to be on the images though http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/daily-live/current/ | 17:45 |
| jawn-smith | So I'm no longer worried about getting golang-defaults uploaded quickly, but I'm curious why it would be seeded in ubuntu-mate but not present in the images? | 17:48 |
| bdmurray | 'The minimal, boot, standard, desktop, and either ship or live seeds go onto our CDs and the supported packages are available from the FTP site.' | 17:49 |
| bdmurray | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SeedManagement | 17:49 |
| jawn-smith | cool, thanks! I'll give it a read | 17:49 |
| jawn-smith | ah yeah it's seeded in ubuntu-mate (supported). Very informative, thanks again! | 17:51 |
| === alan_g__ is now known as alan_g | ||
| jawn-smith | I've identified a couple of packages that should be removed from both Debian and Ubuntu. They are leaf packages that don't provide any binaries. | 19:38 |
| jawn-smith | I know the process for requesting a package removal in Ubuntu, but haven't come across this situation yet where it needs to be removed from Debian as well | 19:39 |
| jawn-smith | Should I just create the bug requesting removal in both the Debian BTS and LP? | 19:39 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: the removal that we'd do in Ubuntu is temporary the package would get auto imported during JJ's development | 19:44 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: it gets auto imported from Debian right? | 19:45 |
| bdmurray | yes at the start of the development cycle | 19:46 |
| jawn-smith | Since it's also a leaf package in Debian it should just be removed there as well, right? | 19:46 |
| bdmurray | autoimported up to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianImportFreeze | 19:47 |
| dbungert | jawn-smith: are these packages going to want control file changes? | 19:47 |
| bdmurray | Why are you asking for its removal? Would the same reason apply to Debian? | 19:48 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: I am asking for removal because the package is a leaf that provides no binaries, and FTBFS with Go 1.17 | 19:48 |
| jawn-smith | Debian is not on Go 1.17 yet, so they are not seeing FTBFS issues with this package | 19:49 |
| bdmurray | So then it seems to me there isn't a reason to remove it from Debian | 19:50 |
| jawn-smith | Okay great, I'll just request the removal in Ubuntu then. Thanks bdmurray | 19:50 |
| jawn-smith | and dbungert: No control changes needed, the packages just FTBFS and aren't needed to build any other packages | 19:51 |
| dbungert | I wonder if they are meant to be someone else's build dependency. Not a reason to keep it for impish though, especially if jj will just reimport it. | 19:52 |
| jawn-smith | Yes that's exactly what they are. There are quite a few go packages that just provide source code used to build other packages. Some of them no longer have reverse-dependencies though' | 19:57 |
| bdmurray | well you might check to see if there is already a removal request for the package in debian | 20:02 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: there are not removal requests in Debian for the packages that I'm looking at | 20:09 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: okay, if there were then we'd probably also want to add them to the sync blacklist | 20:09 |
| jawn-smith | That makes sense. Thanks for answering all these questions | 20:10 |
| bdmurray | no problem | 20:11 |
| === genii is now known as genii-core | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!