[06:47] jbicha, you force-synced mdbtools, re-introducing the ftbfs on ppc64el [07:44] To the release team: would it be possible to override mosquitto tests failures preventing the openssl migration? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/mosquitto/impish/s390x shows that the test failures also happens without proposed. [07:49] Also, see LP: #1929553 -> not the first time. [07:49] Launchpad bug 1929553 in mosquitto (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest is very flaky on s390x" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1929553 [08:59] Kubuntu livefs built failed today [08:59] W: Failure while configuring base packages. This will be re-attempted up to five times. [08:59] W: See /build/chroot/debootstrap/debootstrap.log for details (possibly the package libffi8ubuntu1:amd64 is at fault) [09:00] ah, main ubuntu failed as well [09:00] fun [09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-17 [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [17+35-1~21.04] [09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-17 [sync] (focal-proposed) [17+35-1~20.04] [09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-17 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [17+35-1~18.04] [11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.3 => 1:10.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (focal-proposed/main) [1:14.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (focal-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2:17.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swift (focal-proposed/main) [2.25.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.25.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack) [11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.0-0ubuntu3 => 2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: placement (focal-proposed/main) [3.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:29] bdmurray, hi :), this should be good to go https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1942894 [12:29] Launchpad bug 1942894 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.1.6 for hirsute" [High, Fix Committed] [14:53] ricotz: We don't release SRUs on Friday but feel free to ping someone on Monday [15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.1-5ubuntu4.2 => 1.3.1-5ubuntu4.3] (core, i386-whitelist) [16:16] bdmurray, ack [16:38] xnox: I believe the SRU team is still waiting on you to either provide dwarves-dfsg with bundled libbpf, or provide a test plan for verifying a libbpf update [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2:18.1.0-0ubuntu1] [17:12] coreycb: hey, seeing that neutron is dropping the dependency on neutron-fwaas, do you want to revisit LP: #1891238? There are still reverse-dependencies in the archive that need resolved before we can drop it [17:12] Launchpad bug 1891238 in neutron-fwaas (Ubuntu) "[RM] neutron-fwaas" [Undecided, Expired] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1891238 [17:13] vorlon: ah yes, I'll revisit that. thanks for the reminder [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.9] [19:13] tseliot_: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 has been hanging around in impish-proposed for quite a while now; are there other uploads coming to fix the installability issues with promoting it? [19:15] vorlon, that would be a question for apw . I suppose we need matching kernel modules for it [19:15] vorlon: have you looked at these image build failures at all? [20:47] bdmurray: no, which ones? [20:50] vorlon: all of the impish ones https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/impish/ubuntustudio/+build/298594 looks like it might be an issue with libffi and libp11-kit0 [21:04] hmm [21:06] bdmurray: probably fixable by demoting or removing libffi8ubuntu1 [21:07] removing now [21:07] okay, how would I kick of a rebuild? [21:08] bdmurray: use the iso tracker, probably? [21:09] Do I need to wait a bit for the removal to take place? [21:11] bdmurray: until the next publication run, yes [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scilab [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1] [21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scilab [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.0.1-7ubuntu1~18.04.2] [22:07] bdmurray: I think the test case on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1877524 is a bit mushy; what if things are still crashing but end up in another bucket/ [22:07] Launchpad bug 1877524 in blueman (Ubuntu Focal) "blueman-tray error /home/username/.cache/blueman-tray-1000" [Medium, In Progress] [22:08] bdmurray: and the original error message points at "/home/username", which this diff doesn't address? [22:16] check_single_instance calls get_lockfile which uses GLib.get_users_cache_dir and apport just replaced the users real name with username [22:20] bdmurray, vorlon: Hmm... I didn't get the email for that failure. Would this have been something that would have benefited from my invovement? [22:21] (libffi) [22:21] We have this particular thing under control [22:22] Sweet, thanks. :)