| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Canary) amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 00:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 35 entries have been added, updated or disabled | 01:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server i386 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio i386 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu i386 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 02:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 02:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 02:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 03:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 04:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 04:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 04:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921) | 04:45 | |
| ricotz | hello :), please take a look at this finished libreoffice SRU for focal - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1942894 | 05:11 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1942894 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.1.6 for hirsute" [High, Fix Committed] | 05:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 06:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 06:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 06:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 06:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 06:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 06:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tigervnc (impish-proposed/universe) [1.11.0+dfsg-2 => 1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 07:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tigervnc [source] (impish-proposed) [1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1] | 07:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tigervnc (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.11.0+dfsg-2 => 1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 07:09 | |
| RikMills | can someone retry the kubuntu beta ISO build? livefs failed without a log. the qatracker is ignore my request, as it thinks it is still building | 08:31 |
| fheimes | not sure if this is the right place to ask the following, but I'll just try: | 08:50 |
| fheimes | If one does a 20.04 server installation the default ISO image url that is used (even with a 20.04.3 image) in the interactive network config stage is: | 08:50 |
| fheimes | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/focal/release/ubuntu-20.04-live-server-s390x.iso | 08:50 |
| fheimes | but that URL doesn't work/exist anymore | 08:50 |
| fheimes | iirc this old/initial URL used to be redirected to the latest/current image (no?), so aot: | 08:50 |
| fheimes | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/focal/release/ubuntu-20.04.3-live-server-s390x.iso | 08:50 |
| fheimes | but that's not the case | 08:50 |
| fheimes | hence if s/o does an installation and sticks to the default url, the install fails ("wget: serverreturned error: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found") | 08:50 |
| fheimes | well, easy enough to fix by the person that does the install (just using the 20.04.3 URL), but a bit inconvenient | 08:50 |
| fheimes | shall there be a redirect in place? | 08:50 |
| === RikMills__ is now known as RikMills | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (impish-proposed/main) [1:0.9.2 => 1:0.9.2.1] (desktop-core) | 09:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [1:0.9.2.1] | 10:02 | |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | Hiho Ubuntu-SRU people, today on duty according to the wiki RAOF and bdmurray - I was asked why dpdk in focal/hirsute wasn't SRU released yet | 10:37 |
| cpaelzer | I've rechecked the case but all bugs are green, autopkgtests are happy, aging has 11 days | 10:38 |
| cpaelzer | I couldn't find a good answer, if it is just "didn't get to it yet" that is fine as well, but I wanted to ask if there is a blocker for it that I might miss | 10:38 |
| seb128 | is anyone leading the beta organization? | 13:02 |
| ricotz | bdmurray, hi, libreoffice/hirsute ping :) | 13:04 |
| bdmurray | cpaelzer: I haven't had a chance to look at dpdk yet | 13:55 |
| cpaelzer | ok, thanks for the FYI bdmurray | 13:59 |
| bdmurray | laney, vorlon: Do you know how to get the ISO tracker to realize that a rebuild has failed? I've tried canceling a rebuild request and requesting another rebuild and nothing has changed. | 14:32 |
| laney | bdmurray: as cdimage@ancientminister, run `rebuild-requests -n` to see if it is a stuck request, then `rebuild-requests -c` to cancel it if so | 14:50 |
| slyon | ddstreet: wrt. to the latest systemd Focal SRU: With the old crash not happening anymore and the new crash happening less frequent, I think we should ask the release team to manually approve it. Here is my rationale: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816/comments/1079349 | 14:53 |
| slyon | if you agree I can talk to people to get it done. | 14:53 |
| bdmurray | laney: thanks, what are valid instance names? | 14:56 |
| laney | I forgot.. | 14:57 |
| laney | . | 14:57 |
| laney | maybe "iso"? | 14:57 |
| laney | if not, check in the shell history | 14:57 |
| tseliot | bdmurray, hey, any chance the new ubuntu-drivers-common and nvidia-prime can make it into the beta iso? | 14:59 |
| bdmurray | laney: it was iso | 15:19 |
| ddstreet | slyon yep sounds good to me - and the phasing only applies to desktop installs anyway in focal, IIUC | 15:22 |
| slyon | ack | 15:28 |
| laney | 👍 | 15:29 |
| bdmurray | RikMills: I've retried the kubuntu beta ISO build | 15:32 |
| slyon | ubuntu-release, could someone please whitelist systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 (focal) in the phased-updater? The rational goes here: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816/comments/1079349 | 15:32 |
| bdmurray | along with everything else | 15:32 |
| RikMills | bdmurray: thanks! | 15:32 |
| bdmurray | where everything is the stuff that failed to build | 15:33 |
| slyon | basically: we have a new crash report (replacing an old one) stopping the phased updates. With the old crash not happening anymore and the new crash happening less frequent, so it's an improvement overall. | 15:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1 => 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-server) | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.9.1-1ubuntu1 => 5.9.1-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server) | 15:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 16:14 | |
| RikMills | \o/ | 16:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 16:21 | |
| bdmurray | tseliot: ubuntu-drivers-common doesn't seem important based off the debdiff | 16:23 |
| bdmurray | tseliot: also nvidia-prime is on the beta images | 16:29 |
| bdmurray | or what will be them | 16:29 |
| bdmurray | retrying a Lubuntu build | 16:52 |
| bdmurray | Oh no that was focal, nevermind me! | 16:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 17:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Canary) amd64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ms-gsl (impish-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-4ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-4ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ms-gsl [source] (impish-proposed) [3.1.0-4ubuntu2] | 17:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sqlparse (impish-proposed/main) [0.4.1-1 => 0.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Impish Beta] has been disabled | 17:35 | |
| falcojr | bdmurray: reminder that cloud-init SRU has new uploads queued for B,F, and H (not trying to be pushy...just a reminder for today) | 19:26 |
| bdmurray | falcojr: bug 1939603 is missing an SRU template | 19:29 |
| ubottu | Bug 1939603 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "Oracle DataSource Fails When Used With a Bionic Image" [Medium, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1939603 | 19:29 |
| bdmurray | falcojr: and the other cherry pick doesn't have a bug is there a reason for that? | 19:30 |
| falcojr | bdmurray: it was found during testing of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1940871 | 19:31 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1940871 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Hirsute) "sru cloud-init (21.2-3 to 21.3-1) Bionic, Focal, and Hirsute" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 19:31 |
| bdmurray | falcojr: how will we know that whatever it is fixing is actually fixed? | 19:33 |
| falcojr | it included an integration test and we'll rerun the Azure and Oracle tests | 19:34 |
| bdmurray | okay, the other bug I mentioned still needs an SRU template though | 19:40 |
| falcojr | yeah, thanks. Putting that together now | 19:40 |
| falcojr | bdmurray: updated bug 1939603 | 19:56 |
| ubottu | Bug 1939603 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Bionic) "Oracle DataSource Fails When Used With a Bionic Image" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1939603 | 19:56 |
| sergiodj | ubuntu-archive: hi, I'd appreciate if you could take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/408965. thanks | 20:08 |
| sergiodj | kanashiro: ^ | 20:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (focal-proposed/main) [1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.4 => 1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.5] (ubuntu-server) | 20:25 | |
| === cascardo_ is now known as cascardo | ||
| jawn-smith | Raspberry Pi impish-beta images are broken. They were built with kernel 5.13.0-1006-raspi, which has bug LP: #1943097 | 20:58 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1943097 in Ubuntu "Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1943097 | 20:58 |
| jawn-smith | TL;DR: kernel 5.13 introduced a linux-modules-extra package, which contains kernel modules not included by default. The usb storage module is mistakenly included in linux-modules-extra, and is therefore not included by default. | 20:58 |
| jawn-smith | Kernel 5.13.0-1007 has a fix for this, but is still in -proposed | 20:58 |
| vorlon | apw: ^^ | 21:09 |
| * apw looks up | 21:10 | |
| bdmurray | there are some linux-meta-raspi autopkgtest failures | 21:10 |
| apw | that rings a bell; juergh ^ was this not fixed in the kernels we just slid out from the previous sru cycle? | 21:11 |
| bdmurray | I believe it is but the package is stuck in -proposed | 21:11 |
| bdmurray | In part because of the freeze but then there are also autopkgtest failures | 21:12 |
| bdmurray | I'm retrying the systemd one | 21:12 |
| jawn-smith | I'm trying the wireguard test locally. If it fails I suspect LP: #1944397 may be involved | 21:14 |
| jawn-smith | I'm also trying to recreate that bug currently | 21:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1944397 in linux-raspi (Ubuntu) "hdmi broken on 5.13.0-1007-raspi" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1944397 | 21:15 |
| vorlon | bdmurray, apw, jawn-smith: fwiw if the kernel currently in the release pocket is unreleasable in a beta, then I'm inclined to promote the package currently in -proposed without further analysis because it doesn't seem like it can make it worse? | 21:19 |
| vorlon | jawn-smith: is it only the RPi4 8GB that's affected? | 21:19 |
| jawn-smith | vorlon: no. It is USB boot on any Pi | 21:19 |
| apw | indeed it is hard to see how it can be worse. | 21:20 |
| vorlon | jawn-smith: ok; so we could regress Pis that are booting from other targets than USB, but otherwise no regression | 21:20 |
| jawn-smith | vorlon: correct | 21:20 |
| vorlon | and USB boot is the common case across the various Pi hardware? | 21:20 |
| jawn-smith | SD is most common | 21:20 |
| vorlon | ah ok | 21:20 |
| vorlon | so there's still some possibility of regressing booted systems, but not really a chance of regressing install media | 21:21 |
| * vorlon tries to remember where the page is for the kernel team's promotion process | 21:22 | |
| jawn-smith | vorlon: if LP: #1944397 turns out to be a real issue (I'm working on re-creating now) I would say that it regresses the install media. | 21:22 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1944397 in linux-raspi (Ubuntu) "hdmi broken on 5.13.0-1007-raspi" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1944397 | 21:22 |
| jawn-smith | It would mean HDMI was not working on the SD installation that is currently functional. But that's still an if that I'm trying to test out | 21:23 |
| vorlon | jawn-smith: how can it regress the install media if the USB install media currently doesn't work | 21:23 |
| bdmurray | To be clear you mean the kernel in -proposed could be worse? | 21:23 |
| bdmurray | If you don't have HDMI working | 21:24 |
| bdmurray | Because HDMI is more common than booting from USB | 21:24 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: correct | 21:24 |
| jawn-smith | booting with SD card to an HDMI session is a very common use case | 21:25 |
| vorlon | right | 21:25 |
| jawn-smith | I'm installing the -proposed kernel now but it's to an SD and that takes a little while | 21:27 |
| bdmurray | Okay, thanks for testing it! | 21:27 |
| jawn-smith | Looking more closely at LP: #1944397 it appears to only be an issue on an HDMI display with no audio output. I don't have one of those, and they seem unlikely to be very common | 21:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1944397 in linux-raspi (Ubuntu) "hdmi broken on 5.13.0-1007-raspi" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1944397 | 21:36 |
| bjf | bdmurray, jawn-smith is there a bug filed for the failure to boot from USB and if so can i get that please? | 21:38 |
| bdmurray | bjf: that's bug 1943097 | 21:39 |
| bjf | bdmurray, comment #17 indicates it's fixed. are we saying that it is not? | 21:40 |
| jawn-smith | bjf: it's fixed in -proposed | 21:41 |
| ubottu | Bug 1943097 in Ubuntu "Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1943097 | 21:41 |
| bdmurray | bjf: it is fixed but not in the images for the beta | 21:41 |
| bjf | bdmurray, ack | 21:41 |
| bdmurray | bjf: that being said we are testing bug 1944397 which might be an issue with the kernel in -proposed | 21:42 |
| ubottu | Bug 1944397 in linux-raspi (Ubuntu) "hdmi broken on 5.13.0-1007-raspi" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1944397 | 21:42 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray, bjf: I just got my -proposed kernel to boot and HDMI is working fine | 21:42 |
| jawn-smith | looking more closely at the dmesg logs in that bug I do think there may be an issue with HDMI displays that have no audio output, but I lack the hardware to test that | 21:43 |
| bjf | juergh, ^ | 21:43 |
| tseliot | bdmurray, the last build of u-d-c fixed a FTBFS, caused by some codestyle issues. The previous changelog shows why the new ubuntu-drivers-common matters | 22:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1) | 23:05 | |
| xnox | bdmurray: vorlon: can https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/3.4.10-4ubuntu1.9 please be released to xenial-updates and xenial-security? it's now 7 days away until xenial will loose connectivity to letsencrypt websites, and i fear some people may not receive the update in time now. | 23:28 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: so bug 1943097 only affects people trying to use USB as their boot media? | 23:33 |
| ubottu | Bug 1943097 in Ubuntu "Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1943097 | 23:33 |
| bdmurray | oh but then the USB file copy part of the image test fails too so that's not great | 23:35 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: it affects anyone trying to use USB storage | 23:36 |
| jawn-smith | so indeed the image tests will fail, as you mentioned | 23:36 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: so I'm leaning towards releasing the linux-raspi. jawn-smith has tested Pis w/ HDMI and audio and those are fine | 23:37 |
| bdmurray | I think HDMI monitors w/o audio are less common | 23:38 |
| bdmurray | xnox: what's up with these autopkgtest regressions? | 23:38 |
| * bdmurray reads the bug | 23:39 | |
| xnox | bdmurray: commented on the bug report.... | 23:39 |
| xnox | *it is commented.... | 23:40 |
| * xnox is bad with verb tenses | 23:40 | |
| bdmurray | Yeah I found it now | 23:40 |
| jawn-smith | bdmurray: agreed about the monitors | 23:40 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: You tested a couple of models correct? | 23:42 |
| bdmurray | s/couple/few/ | 23:42 |
| jawn-smi1 | bdmurray: yes, I tested the Pi 4 2G, 4G, 8G, and Pi 400 | 23:44 |
| jawn-smi1 | All of them had HDMI output | 23:46 |
| bdmurray | yeah, mine was fine too | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!