[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Canary) amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[00:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 35 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Server i386 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Ubuntu Studio i386 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Upgrade Xubuntu i386 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] (20210920) has been added
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[02:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[03:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[04:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921)
[05:11] <ricotz> hello :), please take a look at this finished libreoffice SRU for focal - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1942894
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[06:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[07:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tigervnc (impish-proposed/universe) [1.11.0+dfsg-2 => 1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tigervnc [source] (impish-proposed) [1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tigervnc (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.11.0+dfsg-2 => 1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[08:31] <RikMills> can someone retry the kubuntu beta ISO build? livefs failed without a log. the qatracker is ignore my request, as it thinks it is still building
[08:50] <fheimes> not sure if this is the right place to ask the following, but I'll just try:
[08:50] <fheimes> If one does a 20.04 server installation the default ISO image url that is used  (even with a 20.04.3 image) in the interactive network config stage is:
[08:50] <fheimes> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/focal/release/ubuntu-20.04-live-server-s390x.iso
[08:50] <fheimes> but that URL doesn't work/exist anymore
[08:50] <fheimes> iirc this old/initial URL used to be redirected to the latest/current image (no?), so aot:
[08:50] <fheimes> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/focal/release/ubuntu-20.04.3-live-server-s390x.iso
[08:50] <fheimes> but that's not the case
[08:50] <fheimes> hence if s/o does an installation and sticks to the default url, the install fails ("wget: serverreturned error: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found")
[08:50] <fheimes> well, easy enough to fix by the person that does the install (just using the 20.04.3 URL), but a bit inconvenient
[08:50] <fheimes> shall there be a redirect in place?
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (impish-proposed/main) [1:0.9.2 => 1:0.9.2.1] (desktop-core)
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [1:0.9.2.1]
[10:37] <cpaelzer> Hiho Ubuntu-SRU people, today on duty according to the wiki RAOF and bdmurray - I was asked why dpdk in focal/hirsute wasn't SRU released yet
[10:38] <cpaelzer> I've rechecked the case but all bugs are green, autopkgtests are happy, aging has 11 days
[10:38] <cpaelzer> I couldn't find a good answer, if it is just "didn't get to it yet" that is fine as well, but I wanted to ask if there is a blocker for it that I might miss
[13:02] <seb128> is anyone leading the beta organization?
[13:04] <ricotz> bdmurray, hi, libreoffice/hirsute ping :)
[13:55] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: I haven't had a chance to look at dpdk yet
[13:59] <cpaelzer> ok, thanks for the FYI bdmurray
[14:32] <bdmurray> laney, vorlon: Do you know how to get the ISO tracker to realize that a rebuild has failed? I've tried canceling a rebuild request and requesting another rebuild and nothing has changed.
[14:50] <laney> bdmurray: as cdimage@ancientminister, run `rebuild-requests -n` to see if it is a stuck request, then `rebuild-requests -c` to cancel it if so
[14:53] <slyon> ddstreet: wrt. to the latest systemd Focal SRU: With the old crash not happening anymore and the new crash happening less frequent, I think we should ask the release team to manually approve it. Here is my rationale: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816/comments/1079349
[14:53] <slyon> if you agree I can talk to people to get it done.
[14:56] <bdmurray> laney: thanks, what are valid instance names?
[14:57] <laney> I forgot..
[14:57] <laney> .
[14:57] <laney> maybe "iso"?
[14:57] <laney> if not, check in the shell history
[14:59] <tseliot> bdmurray, hey, any chance the new ubuntu-drivers-common and nvidia-prime can make it into the beta iso?
[15:19] <bdmurray> laney: it was iso
[15:22] <ddstreet> slyon yep sounds good to me - and the phasing only applies to desktop installs anyway in focal, IIUC
[15:28] <slyon> ack
[15:29] <laney> 👍
[15:32] <bdmurray> RikMills: I've retried the kubuntu beta ISO build
[15:32] <slyon> ubuntu-release, could someone please whitelist systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 (focal) in the phased-updater? The rational goes here: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816/comments/1079349
[15:32] <bdmurray> along with everything else
[15:32] <RikMills> bdmurray: thanks!
[15:33] <bdmurray> where everything is the stuff that failed to build
[15:33] <slyon> basically: we have a new crash report (replacing an old one) stopping the phased updates. With the old crash not happening anymore and the new crash happening less frequent, so it's an improvement overall.
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.2-1ubuntu3.1 => 5.8.2-1ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-server)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.9.1-1ubuntu1 => 5.9.1-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[16:19] <RikMills> \o/
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[16:23] <bdmurray> tseliot: ubuntu-drivers-common doesn't seem important based off the debdiff
[16:29] <bdmurray> tseliot: also nvidia-prime is on the beta images
[16:29] <bdmurray> or what will be them
[16:52] <bdmurray> retrying a Lubuntu build
[16:53] <bdmurray> Oh no that was focal, nevermind me!
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Canary) amd64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ms-gsl (impish-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-4ubuntu1 => 3.1.0-4ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ms-gsl [source] (impish-proposed) [3.1.0-4ubuntu2]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sqlparse (impish-proposed/main) [0.4.1-1 => 0.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Impish Beta] has been disabled
[19:26] <falcojr> bdmurray: reminder that cloud-init SRU has new uploads queued for B,F, and H (not trying to be pushy...just a reminder for today)
[19:29] <bdmurray> falcojr: bug 1939603 is missing an SRU template
[19:30] <bdmurray> falcojr: and the other cherry pick doesn't have a bug is there a reason for that?
[19:31] <falcojr> bdmurray: it was found during testing of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1940871
[19:33] <bdmurray> falcojr: how will we know that whatever it is fixing is actually fixed?
[19:34] <falcojr> it included an integration test and we'll rerun the Azure and Oracle tests
[19:40] <bdmurray> okay, the other bug I mentioned still needs an SRU template though
[19:40] <falcojr> yeah, thanks. Putting that together now
[19:56] <falcojr> bdmurray: updated bug 1939603
[20:08] <sergiodj> ubuntu-archive: hi, I'd appreciate if you could take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/408965.  thanks
[20:08] <sergiodj> kanashiro: ^
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (focal-proposed/main) [1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.4 => 1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.5] (ubuntu-server)
[20:58] <jawn-smith> Raspberry Pi impish-beta images are broken. They were built with kernel 5.13.0-1006-raspi, which has bug LP: #1943097
[20:58] <jawn-smith> TL;DR: kernel 5.13 introduced a linux-modules-extra package, which contains kernel modules not included by default. The usb storage module is mistakenly included in linux-modules-extra, and is therefore not included by default.
[20:58] <jawn-smith> Kernel 5.13.0-1007 has a fix for this, but is still in -proposed
[21:09] <vorlon> apw: ^^
[21:10]  * apw looks up
[21:10] <bdmurray> there are some linux-meta-raspi autopkgtest failures
[21:11] <apw> that rings a bell; juergh ^ was this not fixed in the kernels we just slid out from the previous sru cycle?
[21:11] <bdmurray> I believe it is but the package is stuck in -proposed
[21:12] <bdmurray> In part because of the freeze but then there are also autopkgtest failures
[21:12] <bdmurray> I'm retrying the systemd one
[21:14] <jawn-smith> I'm trying the wireguard test locally. If it fails I suspect LP: #1944397 may be involved
[21:15] <jawn-smith> I'm also trying to recreate that bug currently
[21:19] <vorlon> bdmurray, apw, jawn-smith: fwiw if the kernel currently in the release pocket is unreleasable in a beta, then I'm inclined to promote the package currently in -proposed without further analysis because it doesn't seem like it can make it worse?
[21:19] <vorlon> jawn-smith: is it only the RPi4 8GB that's affected?
[21:19] <jawn-smith> vorlon: no. It is USB boot on any Pi
[21:20] <apw> indeed it is hard to see how it can be worse.
[21:20] <vorlon> jawn-smith: ok; so we could regress Pis that are booting from other targets than USB, but otherwise no regression
[21:20] <jawn-smith> vorlon: correct
[21:20] <vorlon> and USB boot is the common case across the various Pi hardware?
[21:20] <jawn-smith> SD is most common
[21:20] <vorlon> ah ok
[21:21] <vorlon> so there's still some possibility of regressing booted systems, but not really a chance of regressing install media
[21:22]  * vorlon tries to remember where the page is for the kernel team's promotion process
[21:22] <jawn-smith> vorlon: if LP: #1944397 turns out to be a real issue (I'm working on re-creating now) I would say that it regresses the install media.
[21:23] <jawn-smith> It would mean HDMI was not working on the SD installation that is currently functional. But that's still an if that I'm trying to test out
[21:23] <vorlon> jawn-smith: how can it regress the install media if the USB install media currently doesn't work
[21:23] <bdmurray> To be clear you mean the kernel in -proposed could be worse?
[21:24] <bdmurray> If you don't have HDMI working
[21:24] <bdmurray> Because HDMI is more common than booting from USB
[21:24] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: correct
[21:25] <jawn-smith> booting with SD card to an HDMI session is a very common use case
[21:25] <vorlon> right
[21:27] <jawn-smith> I'm installing the -proposed kernel now but it's to an SD and that takes a little while
[21:27] <bdmurray> Okay, thanks for testing it!
[21:36] <jawn-smith> Looking more closely at LP: #1944397 it appears to only be an issue on an HDMI display with no audio output. I don't have one of those, and they seem unlikely to be very common
[21:38] <bjf> bdmurray, jawn-smith is there a bug filed for the failure to boot from USB and if so can i get that please?
[21:39] <bdmurray> bjf: that's bug 1943097
[21:40] <bjf> bdmurray, comment #17 indicates it's fixed. are we saying that it is not?
[21:41] <jawn-smith> bjf: it's fixed in -proposed
[21:41] <bdmurray> bjf: it is fixed but not in the images for the beta
[21:41] <bjf> bdmurray, ack
[21:42] <bdmurray> bjf: that being said we are testing bug 1944397 which might be an issue with the kernel in -proposed
[21:42] <jawn-smith> bdmurray, bjf: I just got my -proposed kernel to boot and HDMI is working fine
[21:43] <jawn-smith> looking more closely at the dmesg logs in that bug I do think there may be an issue with HDMI displays that have no audio output, but I lack the hardware to test that
[21:43] <bjf> juergh, ^
[22:42] <tseliot> bdmurray, the last build of u-d-c fixed a FTBFS, caused by some codestyle issues. The previous changelog shows why the new ubuntu-drivers-common matters
[23:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210921.1)
[23:28] <xnox> bdmurray:  vorlon: can https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/3.4.10-4ubuntu1.9 please be released to xenial-updates and xenial-security? it's now 7 days away until xenial will loose connectivity to letsencrypt websites, and i fear some people may not receive the update in time now.
[23:33] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: so bug 1943097 only affects people trying to use USB as their boot media?
[23:35] <bdmurray> oh but then the USB file copy part of the image test fails too so that's not great
[23:36] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: it affects anyone trying to use USB storage
[23:36] <jawn-smith> so indeed the image tests will fail, as you mentioned
[23:37] <bdmurray> vorlon: so I'm leaning towards releasing the linux-raspi. jawn-smith has tested Pis w/ HDMI and audio and those are fine
[23:38] <bdmurray> I think HDMI monitors w/o audio are less common
[23:38] <bdmurray> xnox: what's up with these autopkgtest regressions?
[23:39]  * bdmurray reads the bug
[23:39] <xnox> bdmurray:  commented on the bug report....
[23:40] <xnox> *it is commented....
[23:40]  * xnox is bad with verb tenses
[23:40] <bdmurray> Yeah I found it now
[23:40] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: agreed about the monitors
[23:42] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: You tested a couple of models correct?
[23:42] <bdmurray> s/couple/few/
[23:44] <jawn-smi1> bdmurray: yes, I tested the Pi 4 2G, 4G, 8G, and Pi 400
[23:46] <jawn-smi1> All of them had HDMI output
[23:48] <bdmurray> yeah, mine was fine too