[01:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: secure-delete (impish-proposed/universe) [3.1-6ubuntu2 => 3.1-7] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted secure-delete [sync] (impish-proposed) [3.1-7]
[01:48] <bdmurray> There'll be a rebuild of images which use linux-raspi in a bit
[03:20] <RAOF> slyon: WRT systemd in Focal phased-updater whitelisting - do we know if the new, less frequent crashes are hitting the same set of people?
[03:23] <RAOF> Because if they're hitting different people then fewer crashes is a less-clear win.
[03:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[04:15] <bdmurray> I've started the respin of raspi images
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[04:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mame (impish-proposed/universe) [0.235+dfsg.1-1 => 0.235+dfsg.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mame [source] (impish-proposed) [0.235+dfsg.1-1ubuntu1]
[07:21] <seb128> oSoMoN, hey there, so the current impish iso has firefox as a snap and a deb, we probably need ubuntu-desktop source uploaded for the deb removal to be active?
[07:22] <oSoMoN> seb128, right, I can take care of that
[07:22] <seb128> oSoMoN, thanks! I mentioned it on ~Desktop yesterday but I was unsure if that was something bdmurray was handling or he spoke just of the supported seeds changes
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ms-gsl (impish-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-4ubuntu2 => 3.1.0-4ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ms-gsl [source] (impish-proposed) [3.1.0-4ubuntu3]
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (impish-proposed/universe) [0.13.02-1 => 0.13.03-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.13.03-1]
[07:58] <juergh> bjf, ack. looking.
[09:15] <oSoMoN> seb128, just to make sure, the ubuntu-meta update is something we want in the beta, so it's okay to upload now, right?
[09:21] <seb128> oSoMoN, yes
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (impish-proposed/main) [1.471 => 1.472] (core)
[09:30] <oSoMoN> seb128, ^
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zoneminder (impish-proposed/universe) [1.36.5+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 1.36.7+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ivar (impish-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:35] <seb128> ubuntu release members, could you review ^ for beta, without it the desktop ISO includes firefox as a deb which we don't want anymore
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ivar [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zoneminder [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.36.7+dfsg1-1]
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nodejs (impish-proposed/universe) [12.22.5~dfsg-2ubuntu2 => 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (impish-proposed/main) [21.10.3 => 21.10.4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyroute2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.21-0.1ubuntu2.1]
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted blueman [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.2-1ubuntu0.3]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ivar (impish-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2 => 1.3.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ivar [source] (impish-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tigervnc [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1]
[14:02] <bdmurray> oSoMoN: can you tell me about the language-selector move?
[14:05] <bdmurray> oSoMoN: also the Firefox snap doesn't seem to be available for every architecture https://snapcraft.io/firefox
[14:08] <seb128> bdmurray, we only build desktop ISOs for amd64 and amd64 no?
[14:09] <oSoMoN> bdmurray, I assumed the language-selector move was a previous seed change that hadn't been followed by an ubuntu-meta update, but now I'm not seeing the corresponding changes in the seed, so I'm confused, it looks like I might have messed up
[14:10] <bdmurray> seb128: that's a good point
[14:11] <seb128> arm64*
[14:12] <seb128> unsure why we have language selector change in there either :-/
[14:14] <bdmurray> Ah I see now
[14:14] <bdmurray> https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/408418
[14:17] <oSoMoN> ah, I wasn't looking at the correct seed…
[14:17] <oSoMoN> so I didn't mess up after all
[14:20] <seb128> bdmurray, do you have an idea why the recent builds from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/impish/ubuntu-canary are from the primary archive rather than the canary one?
[14:20] <seb128> bdmurray, it's resulting in non working ISO for our new installer
[14:21] <seb128> since we have some overrides we need in the ppa for the installer to work properly
[14:21] <bdmurray> I don't have an immediate answer but will look after finishing ubuntu-meta
[14:23] <bdmurray> I guess you want ubuntu-settings in too since we are doing a respin?
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (impish-proposed) [1.472]
[14:24] <bdmurray> oSoMoN, seb128 ^
[14:24] <seb128> bdmurray, yes
[14:25] <seb128> it's changing the launcher config to include the firefox entry rather than the deb
[14:25] <seb128> +snap
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (impish-proposed) [21.10.4]
[14:29] <slyon> ping ubuntu-release, could someone please whitelist systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 (focal) in the phased-updater? The rational goes here: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816/comments/1079349
[14:29] <slyon> summary: we have a new crash report (replacing an old one) stopping the phased updates. With the old crash not happening anymore and the new crash happening less frequent, so it's an improvement overall.
[14:29] <bdmurray> slyon: I think RAOF had a question about that
[14:29] <bdmurray> https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/09/22/%23ubuntu-release.html
[14:36] <bdmurray> seb128: so the ubuntu-canary project isn't part of the beta and should continue to be built daily. Is that correct?
[14:41] <bdmurray> slyon: also its ubuntu-sru who can override a package phasing issue
[14:42] <slyon> bdmurray: thanks! I must have missed that.
[14:42] <slyon> I will get back to him ten
[14:42] <slyon> then*
[14:53] <seb128> bdmurray, yes
[14:55] <bdmurray> seb128: okay, do you want a manual build of it now or would tomorrow's daily be fine?
[14:57] <bdmurray> I'll just build it now
[14:57] <seb128> bdmurray, now would be nicer if that's not much work for you
[14:57] <seb128> thx
[15:03] <ginggs> would someone please review https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/408934 ?
[15:03] <ginggs> i'm hoping to include that in my +1 report :)
[15:14] <falcojr> bdmurray: for the queued cloud-init uploads, is that something you were still looking at, or is new day new vanguard so rbasak should look at it?
[15:15] <bdmurray> falcojr: I'm a bit busy with the beta so if rbasak could do that would help otherwise I might have some time in a couple of hours
[15:20] <slyon> RAOF: wrt. the systemd focal SRU phased-updater whitelisting: Yes, there is evidence that it does hit the same set of people. I did a spot check on the SystemIdentifiers on errors.ubuntu.com that reported the new crash and found that many of them also reported the old systemd crash in the past, e.g.:
[15:20] <slyon> https://errors.ubuntu.com/user/9d2af7e481319e1328dfe0a2230cdfbb0dbb1d6d80a54d69fa4de8c24a844e6aff7119ce83ef0591a956231f5ceaa06c1fe064adefb60aa3701d28caa5f46cb5 (1st vs 3rd systemd crash)
[15:33] <bdmurray> There'll be rebuilds of Ubuntu Desktop amd64 and Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi today
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[15:39] <bdmurray> ginggs: merged
[15:40] <ginggs> bdmurray: thanks!
[15:44] <tseliot> bdmurray, hey, did you get my message about ubuntu-drivers-common?
[15:46] <tseliot> bdmurray, this is the missing changelog (the revision after it fixes the failing tests) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.9.2
[15:46] <bdmurray> tseliot: I did but it would require a respin of just about every image
[15:46] <tseliot> that's too bad
[17:24] <jawn-smith> waveform: trying to decide if something is an iso test case failure or not.
[17:25] <jawn-smith> When working through the wifi test, I got to the step where I run `netplan apply` and noticed that the included /etc/netplan/10-rpi-ethernet-eth0.yaml is causing errors
[17:25] <jawn-smith> Cannot find unique matching interface for eth0: {'driver': 'bcmgenet smsc95xx lan78xx'}
[17:25] <jawn-smith> (wifi works fine though)
[17:28] <bdmurray> I might have seen that too, did it connect though?
[17:31] <jawn-smith> Only after I commented out the contents of that 10-...yaml file
[17:32] <jawn-smith> I found LP: #1918421 that seems to be this
[17:34] <Eickmeyer> Not sure if anybody here saw this, but all, if not most, Electron apps are broken due to glibc as identified by seb128. bug 1944468
[17:35] <bdmurray> Did you see that the bug was tagged rls-ii-incoming? That means the team responsible for package has been / will be alerted about it.
[17:36] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I did not see that. I guess that's Foundations that's responsible?
[17:36] <bdmurray> yes
[17:36] <Eickmeyer> Ok, sounds good. Honestly, I didn't know what that tag did to begin with.
[17:37]  * Eickmeyer goes back to regularily scheduled programming
[17:37] <Eickmeyer> (and sorry for the noise)
[17:38] <bdmurray> jawn-smith: so ethernet does not work?
[17:39] <jawn-smith> bdmurray, ethernet does work
[17:39] <jawn-smith> It just wouldn't let me "netplan apply" the wifi changes until I "fixed" the ethernet config
[17:40] <jawn-smith> Still working out how the ethernet came up in the first place if that config was broken
[17:41] <bdmurray> The bug description leads me to believe waveform was working around this at one point in time
[17:42] <jawn-smith> There's an MP linked that supposedly fixes it
[17:51] <waveform> yup, just a mo -- there's a fix that bypasses netplan entirely, just digging out where I put that ...
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-opencontainers-specs (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1 => 1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (impish-proposed/main) [1:21.10.7 => 1:21.10.8] (core)
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-opencontainers-specs [source] (impish-proposed) [1.0.2.41.g7413a7f-1ubuntu1]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-containers-common (impish-proposed/universe) [0.38.16+ds1-1 => 0.38.16+ds1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-containers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [0.38.16+ds1-1ubuntu1]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpod (impish-proposed/universe) [3.2.1+ds1-2ubuntu2 => 3.2.1+ds1-2ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpod [source] (impish-proposed) [3.2.1+ds1-2ubuntu3]
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (hirsute-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~21.04.3]
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~20.04.3]
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~18.04.3]
[19:22] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-release: Ubuntu Studio is running into a critical bug with the live session. I should have an upload before EOD, but we'll be needing a respin.
[19:23] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: What makes it critical for the Beta image?
[19:24] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: It's an utter failure of an audio system component.
[19:38] <bdmurray> rebuilding Ubuntu Desktop amd64, Ubuntu Desktop arm64+rapsi and ubuntukylin
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bpython (impish-proposed/universe) [0.21-3 => 0.21-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bpython [source] (impish-proposed) [0.21-3ubuntu1]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922)
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922.1)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (impish-proposed/main) [92.0+build3-0ubuntu2 => 92.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc95-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 1.0.1-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0~rc95-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 1.0.1-0ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected youtube-dl [source] (focal-backports) [2020.06.16.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.0.0~rc95-0ubuntu1~21.04.2 => 1.0.1-0ubuntu2~21.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.2 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: studio-controls (impish-proposed/universe) [2.2.2-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[21:21] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Any chance I can get an ack for ^? That's the fix for the issue I was talking about.
[21:22] <Eickmeyer> Once that's through I can go ahead and trigger a rebuild.
[21:23] <Eickmeyer> (respin)
[21:26] <bdmurray> so convert-studio-controls is going to run at every session start?
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu2~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:26] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Yes, but it's a no-op if the version numbers match.
[21:27] <Eickmeyer> It simply converts the user's .config/autojack/autojack.json if it's outdated.
[21:28] <Eickmeyer> And creates the initial autojack.json if one doesn't exist.
[21:28] <bdmurray> Okay, I was just wondering if it'd slow things down / waste resources
[21:28] <Eickmeyer> Nope.
[21:29] <bdmurray> I'd think it would because you are running another command only to exit but I've accepted it
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted studio-controls [source] (impish-proposed) [2.2.3-0ubuntu1]
[21:30] <Eickmeyer> It's a reallly low-resource application by design.
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~21.04.2 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu2~21.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: golang-github-ishidawataru-sctp (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.0+git20190723.7c296d4-3~ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (bionic-proposed/universe) [20.10.7-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20.10.7-0ubuntu4~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (focal-proposed/universe) [20.10.7-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 20.10.7-0ubuntu4~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.10.7-0ubuntu1~21.04.1 => 20.10.7-0ubuntu4~21.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:02] <mwhudson> who knows about tzdata?
[23:04] <sarnold> :(
[23:12] <vorlon> mwhudson: bdmurray does
[23:12] <vorlon> also I do
[23:13] <mwhudson> vorlon: there seems to be some drama in tzdb land?
[23:13] <vorlon> I haven't heard, but I also don't pay close attention
[23:14] <mwhudson> vorlon: i'll forward an email i got to foundations-crew, maybe you can take a look / point at someone better when you've finished cabaling
[23:14] <vorlon> k
[23:14] <dbungert> I'm still confused on bad vs reset test.  So on the snapd tests, which are flaky, I expect that a future upload of the deb would resolve this, or also a newer version of the snapd snap to the stable channel would also resolve this.  I belive that this should be a bad test, not reset, due to the flakiness.  Is that right?  If they pass randomly, a later failure on this version isn't a
[23:14] <dbungert> regression.
[23:15] <mwhudson> dbungert: i think the difference is that a reset test will cause a failure to be ignored for any new version until a pass is recorded and a bad test only ignores a failure in that specific version
[23:16] <mwhudson> sarnold: yes
[23:17] <dbungert> ok, so I think bad test is desired here, as I would like to see the next deb upload implement the 'pull from beta channel' thing
[23:17] <mwhudson> agreed
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210922.1)
[23:52] <vorlon> dbungert, mwhudson: also I tend to favor badtest for flaky tests for the simple reason that the next time the test un-flakes, without there being a new upload, it's then considered a successful test again
[23:52] <dbungert> actually, I think this hint needs more nuance.  I want to hint to let squashfs-tools and the kernels thru, but we shouldn't let systemd ubuntu7 thru.
[23:57] <vorlon> in that case you want to force-skiptest on the packages that should be allowed through