=== genii is now known as genii-core
[05:17] <lubot_> [telegram] <matkoniecz> yes, on reboot music is still playing (I guess that I will need to enable it manually for all programs supposed to make noise but it is very limited number of them) (re @paguiar735: Did it work?)
[05:19] <lubot_> [telegram] <matkoniecz> Package 'light-locker' is not installed, so not removed (re @paguiar735: Try:
[05:20] <lubot_> [telegram] <matkoniecz> sudo apt -y remove light-locker)
[05:20] <lubot_> [telegram] <matkoniecz> I likely already tried getting rid of screensaver
[05:21] <lubot_> [telegram] <matkoniecz> BTW, how can I check whether scree I bought is AMOLED (kind that still benefits from screensavers)? Would producer advertise it on product listing?
[05:21] <lubot_> [telegram] <matkoniecz> (I have Dell U2415 and see no mention of AMOLED on product listing pages, but maybe producer would try to not mention that?)
[12:45] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Hello, I can't start Lubuntu today😭
[12:45] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Anyone there?
[12:45] <Oxfuxxx> Try to fix boot with a live CD.
[12:45] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> It looks like something is missing. I reach login screen but after that I only see the mouse cursor
[12:46] <Oxfuxxx> i mean live USB stick.
[12:46] <apt-ghetto> @Rodrigo Which session is shown on the login screen?
[12:46] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Ctrl Alt F2 and I login correctly. So maybe something with the graphic environment?
[12:47] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> What do you mean? Just my regular username (I'm the only user btw) (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <apt-ghetto> @Rodrigo Which session is shown on the login screen?)
[12:48] <apt-ghetto> On the login screen with the user, you can choose also the session. By default there are three possibilities: Openbox, Lubuntu and LXQt
[12:48] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> When I try to load my file manager (pcmanfm-qt) I get the following message (re @Rodrigo: Ctrl Alt F2 and I login correctly. So maybe something with the graphic environment?)
[12:48] <apt-ghetto> Maybe you changed the session to Openbox?
[12:49] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Good point, I'll reboot and check (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <apt-ghetto> Maybe you changed the session to Openbox?)
[12:50] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> qt.qpa.xcb: could not connect to display
[12:50] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> qt.qpa.plugin: could not load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in "" even though it was found (re @Rodrigo: When I try to load my file manager (pcmanfm-qt) I get the following message)
[12:52] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Nope, just the same behaviour. The session is tty2 in case it matters (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <apt-ghetto> Maybe you changed the session to Openbox?)
[12:54] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Same with all three options (Lubuntu, LXQt Desktop, Openbox) (re @Rodrigo: Nope, just the same behaviour. The session is tty2 in case it matters)
[12:56] <apt-ghetto> What shows `find . ! -user $USER`?
[13:09] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> it shows 
[13:09] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> ./.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css
[13:09] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> ./.config/gtk-2.0/gtk-widgets.css
[13:10] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> I suspect it may be related to lack of space. I did sudo update and it tells me there is not enough space for some of the things... I will delete some big files and try again
[13:10] <apt-ghetto> sudo apt autoremove
[13:12] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> IT WORKS!!!!
[13:12] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> THANK YOU SO SO SO MUCH!!!
[13:12] <apt-ghetto> you're welcome
[13:12] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> Who would have thought? I have to delete files urgently
[13:13] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/b77b06d9/file_3379_oga.ogg
[13:13] <apt-ghetto> With "autoremove" you can delete old kernels
[13:13] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> I don't know if you can hear audio from IRC, but just again THANK YOU! you saved my day
[13:14] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> it only makes me want to help more people
[13:14] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> my problem is probably too many anaconda environments... but that's another story. (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <apt-ghetto> With "autoremove" you can delete old kernels)
[13:15] <apt-ghetto> Do you have a separate partition for /home?
[13:22] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> mmm is there an fast way to check that from terminal? listing all partitions and where is /home?
[13:23] <apt-ghetto> lsblk -f shows all partitions and the mountpoints, if mounted
[13:23] <apt-ghetto> or you can check /etc/fstab
[13:24] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> I hope it's visible to you. I barely see the letters : https://matterbridge.lubuntu.me/bc0c5632/file_3380.jpg
[13:26] <apt-ghetto> You have only / which contains /home
[13:28] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> I must have a mess in terms of partitions. I should make it more sensible next time I upgrade Lubuntu
[13:30] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> My computer crashed a few days ago when installing an anaconda environment. Thus I guess there is a big temporal directory somewhere full of crap that I don't need. Any chance you know where to find it?
[13:30] <apt-ghetto> You have two disks and each contains two partitions. That is not really a mess. You can ignore the loop devices
[13:31] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> in deed, /home/user00/anaconda3/envs/ is 5.2GB 🤦🏽‍♂️ (re @Rodrigo: my problem is probably too many anaconda environments... but that's another story.)
[13:31] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> that is off topi, ignore it please (re @Rodrigo: My computer crashed a few days ago when installing an anaconda environment. Thus I guess there is a big temporal directory somewhere full of crap that I don't need. Any chance you know where to find it?)
[13:32] <lubot_> [telegram] <Rodrigo> thank SO much for your help today. I leave you alone now😊
[13:33] <apt-ghetto> With the terminal I am normally checking with du /home/$USER -h --max-depth=2 | sort -h 
=== genii-core is now known as genii
=== john is now known as john3698
[20:16] <^-^hi> Isn't anyone planning to bring down lubuntu.net? It looks like phishing with its domain being more "normal" than lubuntu.me
[20:16] <^-^hi> It made me think lubuntu is dead for a long time, by having no versions newer than 19.10
[20:48] <kc2bez> ^-^hi: lubuntu.me is the official site. It is linked to from ubuntu.com 
[20:49] <kc2bez> unfortunately dot net isn't under the control of the Lubuntu project. 
[20:49] <^-^hi> Can't you file a complaint to the domain-registrar?
[20:57] <kc2bez> There isn't too much stopping them from doing what they are doing. 
[20:57] <kc2bez> Legal matters (if pursued) take a long time to resolve. 
[21:03] <tomreyn> the more effective approach will be to point it out as a scam site to those organizations maintaining those phishing / scam databases, which will finally make everyone unable to visit .net (interstitials in web browsers) and drop the site in search engine rankings. but this can be a bit of an ethically difficult thing in term of when you start calling it "scam" and "phishing".
[21:32] <^-^hi> Is it that much "legal"? I doubt it
[21:34] <^-^hi> You hold the trademark (tell me you do), your website is cited as the main one everywhere, one complaint from some developer should be enough
[21:35] <^-^hi> Someone I knew lost their domain to malicious reporting and there were no lawyers involved.
[21:41] <dsc_> apparently my ublock plugin blocks `lubuntu.net`
[22:54] <guiverc> ^-^hi, Canonical own lubuntu.me & ubuntu.com type sites; don't use a search engine to find Ubuntu sites (unless you can peruse search engine results - they offer a number if you ask for a download; legit, fan & fake) - https://ubuntu.com/download/flavours will take you to the official site for any Ubuntu flavor  (all sites it'll send you to are under Ubuntu/Canonical control)
[22:55] <^-^hi> Cool, but I am calling upon you to try taking down that domain by reporting to the registrar
[22:57] <dsc_> do they serve the legit lubuntu binaries?
[22:57] <dsc_> images*
[22:57] <guiverc> next to impossible; it's not actually breaching any rules as I understand it  (it was attempted awhile back; they refused to take it down as they own the address & won't give that up - Ubuntu own lubuntu.me)... what ublock has done is an easier method (doesn't help those not using the plugin though; it wasn't Lubuntu that did that though)