[00:00] <dbungert> vorlon: thanks, I'll resend with skiptest later tonight
[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-hamster (impish-proposed/universe) [0.10.0+git20200509-2 => 0.10.0+git20210628-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-hamster [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.10.0+git20210628-1]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phosh (impish-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-1 => 0.13.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phosh [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.13.1-1]
[01:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calls (impish-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2 => 41~rc-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calls [source] (impish-proposed) [41~rc-1ubuntu1]
[01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: callaudiod (impish-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1 => 0.1.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted callaudiod [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[01:43] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Excuses says I need to contact you to get studio-controls migrated due to the freeze. It had a critical failure as discussed with bdmurray.
[01:43] <Eickmeyer> (hence the upload/fix).
[01:45] <Eickmeyer> Sorry, that could've been a ping to the release team.
[02:13] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: s/could/should/
[02:15] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: this should do it unless I typo'ed it https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/commit/?id=e5f2fd39dca6a66664b11205abbcab9a82f1a6ca
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> Awesome, bdmurray. Thanks! And thanks for being patient with me, I don't always word things as precisely as I or others would like.
[02:25] <bdmurray> No problem, I'm just trying to make sure you know who to ping next time. ;-)
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[03:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phoc (impish-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1build1 => 0.8.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[03:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phoc [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.8.0-2]
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.1.0+build2-0ubuntu2 => 1:91.1.1+build2-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[07:54] <oSoMoN> dear release team, could you please approve firefox and thunderbird (firefox is supposedly not seeded [as a deb] any more, and thunderbird is intentionally blocked in proposed for now, but we intend to unblock it)
[07:55] <seb128> could also someone trigger a build of ubuntu-canary image?
[07:56] <seb128> I would like to see if firefox is dropping after a rebuild since there is no reason it should still be on the ISO
[07:57] <seb128> could be maybe that the Tasks was not updated yet when the previous ISO built? I never understands how those are working
[07:57] <RikMills> firefox is still seeded in most flavours, so if updated and a flavour need a beta respin that would affect that ISO
[07:57] <RikMills> thunnderbird likewise
[07:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[07:59] <oSoMoN> good point, I suppose the firefox update can wait until after beta freeze is over
[08:00] <oSoMoN> wrt thunderbird, it is currently forcefully blocked in proposed, so accepting it won't affect ISOs, but at least it will build and we can test it from there
[08:00] <RikMills> ah
[08:01]  * RikMills forgot about the profile upgrade thing
[08:18] <seb128> not having a release team member on european tz this time around hurts a bit
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (impish-proposed/main) [2.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.16.0-0ubuntu2] (core)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (focal-proposed/main) [20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 20.03.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ovn (hirsute-proposed/main) [20.12.0-0ubuntu2 => 20.12.0-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (impish-proposed/main) [2.51.1+21.10 => 2.52+git78736d] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[11:40] <RikMills> seb128: is l@ney not RT now then?
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[11:45] <RikMills> ignore that. not important
[11:56] <seb128> RikMills, he is but he moved to a new job and isn't as much around as he used to now
[11:57] <RikMills> cool. I won't ping him, but if you happen to read, then congrats on the new job l@aney :D
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [sync] (focal-backports) [13ubuntu1]
[12:32] <icey> hey bdmurray - any reason you released everything but ceilometer on https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1941048 ?
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (impish-proposed/universe) [21.10.1 => 21.10.2] (lubuntu)
[12:34] <tsimonq2> Hi, sorry for doing this on release day, but we have a pretty visible theming bug in the Lubuntu Beta. Please accept.
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-default-settings [source] (impish-proposed) [21.10.2]
[12:45] <bdmurray> oSoMoN: thunderbird is seeded so why is an update needed?
[12:46] <bdmurray> An ubuntu-canary image was automatically built 3 hours
[12:54] <bdmurray> seb128: the canary autobuilt 3 hours ago do you need another one?
[12:55] <seb128> bdmurray, it would be nice, we have a change we would like to get tested
[12:57] <bdmurray> okay, building now
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ca-certificates (impish-proposed/main) [20210119build1 => 20210119ubuntu1] (core)
[13:08] <oSoMoN> bdmurray, the thunderbird update is a regular upstream point release with a number of interesting bug fixes, nothing that requires breaking the beta freeze, but since thunderbird is currently forcefully held in proposed, accepting the upload wouldn't affect the ISOs anyway
[13:09] <oSoMoN> and having it built in impish-proposed would allow me to test it without having to do that in a PPA
[13:09] <oSoMoN> but if you'd rather wait until after the freeze is over, that's absolutely fine by me
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (impish-proposed/main) [2:8.2.2434-3ubuntu2 => 2:8.2.2434-3ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scribus (impish-proposed/universe) [1.5.7+dfsg-4 => 1.5.7+dfsg-5] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (impish-proposed/main) [169 => 170] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:40] <bdmurray> seb128: the new canary image has built
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (impish-proposed/restricted) [470.63.01-0ubuntu5 => 470.74-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (impish-proposed/main) [20.10.1 => 21.10.0] (core)
[13:50] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks!
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.4 => 20.04.5] (core)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[14:38] <PaulW2U> . /usr/bin/byobu-reconnect-sockets
[14:58] <kanashiro> ubuntu-archive: I need a new golang package (golang-github-ishidawataru-sctp) in Bionic to be able to backport docker.io from Impish. I already uploaded it and it is in NEW, could anyone take a look at that? For more info check LP #1938908
[15:14] <seb128> tseliot, hum, I did a daily impish install without being online, on a recent lenovo nvidia laptop and the system was using nouveau
[15:15] <seb128> ubuntu-drivers install after connecting installed 470 drivers
[15:15] <seb128> but now I'm under x11 without wayland as an option
[15:18] <seb128> k, doing prime-select nvidia and a restart later
[15:18] <seb128> now under wayland
[15:18] <seb128> shouldn't that be working out of the box though?
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[15:46] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: I'm going to unblock lubuntu-default-settings as it passed autopkgtests
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-defaults (impish-proposed/main) [2:1.16~0ubuntu1 => 2:1.17~0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:49] <vorlon> kanashiro: isn't the policy for go packages in such cases to vendorize it in the source?
[17:02] <bdmurray> icey: probably because it shows as ftbfs for amd64 on the pending sru page
[17:19] <jawn-smith> juergh: I seem to have recreated LP: #1944397
[17:20] <jawn-smith> It appears to be desktop only
[17:21] <waveform> jawn-smith, sorry, this just occurred to me: can you see what happens if you replace dtoverlay=vc4-kms-v3d in config.txt with dtoverlay=vc4-fkms-v3d (desktop is the only image where we're currently using the "full" kms overlay)
[17:21] <waveform> (out of the box anyway)
[17:21] <jawn-smith> ooh excellent thought
[17:21] <waveform> and/or alternatively what happens if you add dtoverlay=vc4-kms-v3d to the server image
[17:23] <jawn-smith> waveform: no luck on the desktop image changing that argument
[17:24] <jawn-smith> wait, scratch that (for now).
[17:25] <jawn-smith> waveform: changing to vc4-kms-v3d did actually work!
[17:25] <bdmurray> sounds like something else to release note - please! ;-)
[17:26] <waveform> hang on ... changing *to*?
[17:26] <waveform> it should be vc4-kms-v3d by default -- did you change to fkms or to kms?
[17:28] <jawn-smith> mixed them up: was thinking that fkms meant "full". The version that worked is fkms
[17:29] <waveform> ah yes -- welcome to the horribly confusing naming; fkms=fake-kms, kms=full-kms ... urgh
[17:29] <jawn-smith> yeah that's what tripped me up while typing that
[17:29] <waveform> okay, so just to be clear: switching to fkms ("fake" kms) fixed it, while the default kms ("full" kms) is what's broken
[17:30] <jawn-smith> waveform: yes
[17:30] <jawn-smith> about to try full kms on server
[17:31] <waveform> okay -- that does make a fair amount of sense -- under kms ("full") the kernel is in control of the GPU so it's understandable a kernel update could bork things, while under fkms ("fake") the GPU firmware is in charge and the kernel just makes requests via the mailbox, and we haven't changed the firmware so I'd be very surprised if that broke
[17:32] <waveform> (the kernel images have neither full or fake kms enabled by default, just the legacy framebuffer setup)
[17:32] <jawn-smith> bdmurray: this means that desktop images won't work out of the box. They need a config file change to boot at all. Is that something that can be release-noted?
[17:32] <juergh> bdmurray, I'd rather fix than release not. or is that too late already??
[17:32] <juergh> s/not/note/
[17:34] <bdmurray> I guess it depends on what package the fix would need to be in and how many images we'd need to respin
[17:34] <juergh> kernel
[17:34] <jawn-smith> It should be only the desktop image that needs a respin
[17:34] <jawn-smith> the raspi-desktop, that is
[17:35] <bdmurray> well we should respin every image that contains the package...
[17:35] <jawn-smith> ah I see. I guess we don't want different kernels on server vs desktop
[17:35] <juergh> this is a beta release, no? so what's the point of that if we can't fix things?
[17:43] <bdmurray> I'm not sure I understand your question. We can fix it, its just a question of do we do it in the actual beta image or in the next daily build.
[17:46] <juergh> Hmm. I guess I don't understand the process then. What I really care about is that it's fixed in the final release image.
[17:48] <bdmurray> The beta image should be released today and I don't think we can fix this in time but I'd be happy to be wrong. However, we can fix it by the release in 3 weeks.
[18:10] <icey> bdmurray: ah, missed the email; sorry for the noise
[18:13] <bdmurray> icey: no problem, its reasonable to check!
[18:26] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: so lubuntu-default-settings has migrated to release now so you could rebuild your images if you want
 "Simon Quigley: so lubuntu-..." <- Good timing. Thanks.
[18:34] <kanashiro> vorlon, yes, but in this case to ship all the components needed by rdeps in the library package (in this case libnetwork) I needed to add this runtime dep
[18:34] <kanashiro> this is in Impish
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been updated (20210923)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libtgowt [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0~git20210627.91d836d+dfsg-3ubuntu1~21.04]
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected telegram-desktop [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2.9.2+ds-1ubuntu3~21.04]
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected telegram-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [2.9.2+ds-1ubuntu3~20.04]
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:00] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: Is Lubuntu ready?
 "Simon Quigley: Is Lubuntu ready?" <- Go ahead. Can't mark right now.
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Impish Beta] has been marked as ready