[00:18] <mwhudson> RAOF: if you're around and have a moment could you reject the earlier of my livecd-rootfs uploads from the impish unapproved queue?
[00:23] <RAOF> mwhudson: The upload from 3 hours ago is no more!
[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (impish-proposed) [2.739]
[00:27] <mwhudson> RAOF: thanks
[00:27] <mwhudson> RAOF: you don't wear the release team hat do you?
[00:27] <RAOF> I do not wear a release team hat, no.
[00:28] <RAOF> No livecd-rootfs acceptance for you!
[00:28] <mwhudson> boo
[00:28] <mwhudson> but no real hurr
[00:28] <mwhudson> y
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devhelp (impish-proposed/universe) [41~rc-1 => 41.1-1] (ubuntu-budgie) (sync)
[01:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [source] (impish-proposed) [1:21.10.2]
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted greybird-gtk-theme [sync] (impish-proposed) [3.22.15-1]
[01:48] <bdmurray> bluesabre: libxfce4ui is also seeded in ubuntusudio could you check with Eickmeyer about that update?
[01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfce4-whiskermenu-plugin [sync] (impish-proposed) [2.6.0-1]
[01:49] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Don't worry about it, it shouldn't be part of the packageset anyhow. We don't use xfce anymore, not since 20.10.
[01:50] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Well it might be worth looking into why it shows up as being seeded then
[01:51] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Probably leftover from focal. rafaeldtinoco would know more.
[01:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfce4ui [sync] (impish-proposed) [4.16.1-1]
[01:52] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: looking at the manifest from the beta they are still on the Impish image for ubuntustudio http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/releases/impish/beta/ubuntustudio-21.10-beta-dvd-amd64.manifest
[01:53] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: so if you aren't using them it'd be nice to get them removed
[01:53] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Something is pulling it in then, I'm investigating in the seed.
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I can't explain it. Checking germinate and rdeps, it doesn't show up at all, so I don't know how it's showing up in the image.
[05:02] <Ukikie> Eickmeyer: https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-default-settings/tree/debian/control#n16 you're also pulling in xfconf though.
[05:59] <Eickmeyer> Ukikie: I guess I didn't know exo-utils pulled-in xfconf, or that it was an Xfce thing. Fixed now. (bdmurray, no longer seeding as of this upload of ubuntustudio-default-settings)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (impish-proposed/universe) [21.10.7 => 21.10.8] (ubuntustudio)
[06:00] <Eickmeyer> Speaking of which... ^
[06:27] <Ukikie> Eickmeyer: It shouldn't pull in xfconf, but does libxfce4ui and util.
[07:13] <RAOF> Alright! Looks like I get to learn a new bit of our SRU infrastructure!
[07:13] <RAOF> Who wants to teach me about `phased-update-overrides.txt`? :)
[07:20] <RAOF> I've not had to restart phasing before - it looks like https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sru/+junk/phased-update-overrides/view/head:/phased-updates-overrides.txt is the relevant place.
[07:20] <RAOF> (We don't seem to have any documentation about this, either on the SRU wiki or on the AA wiki, or via the various links from the PhasedUpdates LP spec or the current phasing status page)
[07:20] <RAOF> This is re: the request to override the phasing block on systemd in focal.
[07:39] <RAOF> The format of phased-updates-overrides.txt is pretty obvious. Is the process just to add new lines, and then push to the branch, just like britney hints?
[08:05] <seb128> bdmurray, hey there, could you review and accept the desktop syncs in the queue (gnome-characters baobab eog gnome-calendar gnome-system-monitor libdazzle gnome-disk-utility gst-libav gst-plugins-bad1.0 devhelp)
[08:07] <seb128> those are bugfix updates, some are versioned as a new GNOME serie but the content is fixes and translations, mostly components that didn't see real activity during the cycle but they still rolled out a version for the new GNOME
[08:08] <seb128> would be nice also to accept the yaru and shell stack updates, changelog is not trivial but it's also mostly polish and fixes and we would like those versions in the release
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (impish-proposed/main) [1.2.2-2ubuntu2 => 1.2.2-2ubuntu3] (core)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-ugly1.0 (impish-proposed/universe) [1.18.4-2 => 1.18.5-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.16.0-0ubuntu1.1] (core)
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (impish-proposed/main) [1.18.4-1ubuntu2 => 1.18.5-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools-signed (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.16.0-0ubuntu1.1] (core)
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (impish-proposed/main) [1:7.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1:7.2.1-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.37 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.38] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.17 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.18] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3.1 => 1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[09:05] <mwhudson> btw release team, my plan is for another glibc upload for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1944468
[09:05] <mwhudson> i'll roll in the updates from the 2.34 maintenance branch as well i guess
[09:10] <doko> +1
[09:29] <mwhudson> doko: doing a test build at https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+packages?field.name_filter=glibc
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwts (impish-proposed/universe) [21.08.00-0ubuntu1 => 21.09.00-0ubuntu1] (kernel-dkms)
[09:59] <schopin> Hello! Could someone from the SRU team look at LP: #1870813 ? (scilab in bionic and focal) Thanks in advance!
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdfarranger (impish-proposed/universe) [1.6.2-1 => 1.6.2-3] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (impish-proposed/main) [2.33.91-1ubuntu1 => 2.34.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.4] (core)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools-signed (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.4] (core)
[12:10] <ricotz> bdmurray, hi :), could you take a look at libreoffice in impish/queue (as usual it will take quite some time to build)
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-9 (impish-proposed/universe) [1:9.0.1-16.1ubuntu1 => 1:9.0.1-17] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-9 [sync] (impish-proposed) [1:9.0.1-17]
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (impish-proposed) [21.10.8]
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-12 (impish-proposed/main) [1:12.0.1-8build1 => 1:12.0.1-9] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-snapshot (impish-proposed/universe) [1:14~++20210731090915+593059b328cf-1~exp1build1 => 1:14~++20210924122635+4a57f5d1e1c5-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [sync] (impish-proposed) [1:14~++20210924122635+4a57f5d1e1c5-1~exp1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted baobab [sync] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-calendar [sync] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-disk-utility [source] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swell-foop [sync] (impish-proposed) [1:41.0.1-1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eog [sync] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-system-monitor [sync] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-characters [sync] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]
[13:15] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks for the accepting those!
[13:17] <seb128> bdmurray, since you are around, could I get you to trigger a canary build? it seems the daily job is triggering 1 hour earlier than it used to for some reason and I missed the upload target to get the changes included
[13:17] <bdmurray> seb128: the timing change sounds weird but I'll kick off another build
[13:18] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (impish-proposed) [2.53~pre1.git19b68f708]
[13:35] <bdmurray> ricotz: why isn't the version number 1:7.2.1-4ubuntu3 ?
[13:35] <ricotz> bdmurray, the package is not based on the debian tarballs
[13:36] <bdmurray> okay
[13:36] <ricotz> bdmurray, -tarballs and -yaru tarballs are not in debian either
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (impish-proposed) [1:7.2.1-0ubuntu3]
[13:39] <ricotz> bdmurray, thank you
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (impish-proposed) [2.739]
[13:47] <slyon> May I ask ubuntu-sru to have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1926442 (a small bionic backport)? And maybe also have look at accepting the hirsute/focal netplan SRUs, those have aged fairly well now.
[13:57] <cpaelzer> doko: while scanning for issues to look at in +1 I've seen cheesecutter and dub (packages I'd expect not many people look for) to fail the libgphobos rebuild
[13:58] <cpaelzer> doko: I wanted to ask if you look into them already or if you want me to?
[13:58] <cpaelzer> and also if there is a common "oh yeah this happens all the time, that is the solution" pattern that is worth to share let me know
[14:12] <ginggs> cpaelzer: both of those were already FTBFS in https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20210805-impish-impish.html
[14:13] <cpaelzer> I think I found fixed for both of them
[14:13] <cpaelzer> need to check if upstreams already have those
[14:13] <cpaelzer> and need to test if my assumptions are true :-)
[14:17] <bdmurray> seb128: The canary has built now
[14:18] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks!
[14:37] <mfo> hey SRU team o/  (as sil2100, today's SRU vanguard) is out on PTO.   If you have a chance, please remove readline from bionic's unapproved queued. it's waiting on LP bug updates for a while per previous SRU review comments.  and removing it can avoid wasting SRU review cycles only to find that out.  thanks in advance!
[14:44] <ginggs> I sync'd mobile-broadband-provider-info from debian, knowing it is seeded in nearly all flavours, what do I need to do to get it unblocked?  it's just an xml file of mobile broadband settings
[14:45] <bdmurray> ginggs: creating a diff would be superhelpful
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected readline [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.0-4ubuntu1.18.04.1]
[14:46] <ginggs> bdmurray: ack, thanks.  do you want it in a bug?
[14:47] <bdmurray> ginggs: no, a bug isn't necessary
[14:49] <ginggs> there's one in my PPA https://launchpadlibrarian.net/560030430/mobile-broadband-provider-info_20201225-1_20210805-1~ppa1.diff.gz
[14:50] <cking> hi there, is possible for zfsutils-linux 2.0.6-1ubuntu2 to be approved for impish - it incorporates some important point release bug fix and a revert of a fix that caused file system corruption
[14:56] <bdmurray> cking: It looks like there are two uploads?
[14:56] <cking> yep indeed, one with the the point release fixes, and then one for the revert
[14:57] <bdmurray> cking: ah ubuntu2 and ubuntu1. Okay, I'll reject ubuntu 1.
[14:57] <cking> thanks
[14:57] <bdmurray> cking: The Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed in ubuntu1 will be lost though
[14:59] <cking> bdmurray, i can manually fix that up in the bug report if that's OK
[14:59] <bdmurray> cking: well reuploading ubuntu2 with all the changes would be ideal but its up to you
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-13 (impish-proposed/universe) [1:13.0.0~+rc3-1ubuntu2 => 1:13.0.0~+rc4-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[15:00] <cking> bdmurray, i would rather not re-upload as I normally re-test and testing takes me 24+ hours to hand verify all the test cases for this
[15:00] <bdmurray> okay
[15:01] <cking> it's really slow to test risc-v :-)
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-13 [sync] (impish-proposed) [1:13.0.0~+rc4-1]
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-12 (impish-proposed/main) [1:12.0.1-8build1 => 1:12.0.1-9] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (impish-proposed) [2.0.6-1ubuntu1]
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (impish-proposed/main) [21.10.5 => 21.10.6] (desktop-core)
[15:03] <Eickmeyer> If possible, could someone accept the ardour sync? It's the same thing we already have, but with some packaging fixes. It's a rather large diff (and different archive) because I had to manually do the repackage in the version already existing.
[15:06] <oSoMoN> bdmurray, ^ this ubiquity upload fixes bug #1945015
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (impish-proposed) [21.10.6]
[15:17] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, please check/review LP: #1944744 whenever possible thanks
[15:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (impish-proposed/main) [1.32.10-0ubuntu1 => 1.32.12-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (impish-proposed/main) [2.739 => 2.740] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:40] <cking> bdmurray, did the 2nd zfsutils-2.0.6-1ubuntu2 get approved?
[15:41] <bdmurray> cking: Not yet, I'm in a meeting but will look at it next
[15:41] <cking> ok, ta
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (impish-proposed) [2.0.6-1ubuntu2]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-13 (impish-proposed/universe) [1:13.0.0~+rc4-1 => 1:13.0.0~+rc4-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-13 [source] (impish-proposed) [1:13.0.0~+rc4-1ubuntu1]
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (impish-proposed) [2.740]
[16:38] <bdmurray> RAOF: yes that is the process
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted packagekit [source] (impish-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu3]
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dwarves-dfsg [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.21-0ubuntu1~ubuntu21.04.1]
[16:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libbpf [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [0.4.0-1ubuntu1~ubuntu21.04.1]
[17:11] <vorlon> fyi, as part of the handling of last year's and this year's grub CVEs, we have new UEFI signing keys signed by the Ubuntu CA; I will be installing a new signing key to the main archive today which will be used for all shim and grub signing going forward (not kernels, yet; those are signed outside the main archive, and need some case-by-case handling yet)
[17:14] <bdmurray> vorlon: Could you look at bug 1944475? I'd like to release it early since our auto-upgrade testing is broken.
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.2 => 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.3] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[17:57] <LocutusOfBorg> hello vorlon, libmysofa/i386 hint please? nodejs disappeared there
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (bionic-proposed/main) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu3 => 2:17.0.13-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.99-0ubuntu3~18.04.5]
[18:38] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: "disappeared"?
[18:38] <vorlon> bdmurray: I will look a bit later today
[18:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: libmysofa is still published on i386, why did its tests start failing this month?  nodejs was never published on i386 in impish https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/i386/nodejs
[18:56] <kanashiro> vorlon, my last reply about the new docker.io runtime dep in bionic was enough for you? To get it accepted from the NEW queue
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [source] (impish-proposed) [1.18.5-1ubuntu1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [source] (impish-proposed) [1.18.5-1ubuntu1]
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwts [source] (impish-proposed) [21.09.00-0ubuntu1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [source] (impish-proposed) [2.34.0-1ubuntu1]
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (impish-proposed) [1.32.12-0ubuntu1]
[20:48] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, Get:38 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu impish/universe amd64 nodejs amd64 12.22.4~dfsg-1ubuntu1 [122 kB]
[20:49] <LocutusOfBorg> +  * MA: allowed. Thanks Helmut for helping fix crossbuild.
[20:49] <LocutusOfBorg> nodejs passed from ma:foreing to ma:allowed in 12.22.5~dfsg-3
[20:50] <LocutusOfBorg> being nodejs/amd64 installable in i386 was a mistake, right?
[20:51] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I wouldn't say it was a mistake that it was installable, though it probably wasn't ideal that it was pulled in on autopkgtests
[20:51] <vorlon> anyway, that explains and I'll hint, thanks
[20:51] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks to you!
[20:51] <LocutusOfBorg> well, nodejs has lots of internal libraries, running them on i386 should fail
[20:52] <LocutusOfBorg> libnode72 is not arch:independent...
[20:53] <LocutusOfBorg> might work for pure js files, but once you require the library... kaboom!
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dwarves-dfsg [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.21-0ubuntu1~21.04]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dwarves-dfsg [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.21-0ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libbpf [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.0-1ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dwarves-dfsg [source] (focal-proposed) [1.21-0ubuntu1~20.04]
[22:10] <vorlon> bdmurray: 1944475 looks ok to me for early release
[22:13] <bdmurray> vorlon: Could you release it since I verified it?
[22:17] <vorlon> bdmurray: ack
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scribus [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.5.7+dfsg-5]
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdazzle [sync] (impish-proposed) [3.42.0-2]
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-typing-booster (impish-proposed/universe) [2.14.12-1 => 2.14.12-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus-typing-booster [sync] (impish-proposed) [2.14.12-2]
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdazzle [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [3.42.0-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)