[01:03] <ItzSwirlz> jbicha: No, I did not. I'm not up to date with this stuff with queue and all. Maybe if I was *trusted* by people to upload my own packages as a PPU I would (wink wink)
[01:03] <ItzSwirlz> I didn't see 21.10.2 in git, but thanks guys
[06:01] <jpnurmi> good morning
[06:02] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:15] <jpnurmi> hey oSoMoN
[06:16] <oSoMoN> hey jpnurmi 
[06:17] <duflu> Morning jpnurmi and oSoMoN 
[06:19] <jpnurmi> hey duflu
[06:21] <jpnurmi> oSoMoN, i'm going to add some logging here and there. i was planning to create separate PRs for different screens/view models, so they wouldn't block each other due to review requests. it will be _loads_ of PRs but don't get shocked - they will be small and simple. is that ok?
[06:24] <oSoMoN> jpnurmi, that sounds like a good plan, go ahead!
[06:24] <oSoMoN> I'm still very busy with the firefox snap but I'll try to make some room today for reviews
[06:25] <jpnurmi> oSoMoN, no worries, i'll manage :)
[06:54] <didrocks> good morning
[07:01] <jpnurmi> hey didrocks
[07:01] <didrocks> hey jpnurmi 
[07:17] <duflu> Hi didrocks 
[07:27] <didrocks> hey duflu 
[07:35] <callmepk> good afternoon
[07:39] <duflu> Hi callmepk 
[07:41] <oSoMoN> hey didrocks, duflu, callmepk 
[07:42] <callmepk> hi duflu oSoMoN didrocks 
[07:43] <didrocks> hey callmepk, oSoMoN
[07:50] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[07:50] <oSoMoN> salut seb128 
[07:50] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, ça va ? 
[07:50] <seb128> hey callmepk duflu didrocks
[07:51] <oSoMoN> bien, et toi?
[07:51] <callmepk> hi seb128 
[07:51] <seb128> oSoMoN, nice to see that mozilla figured out the translations issue ;-)
[07:51] <didrocks> salut seb128 
[07:51] <seb128> ça va! un peu fatigué, saison des rhumes donc réveillé la nuit
[07:53] <duflu> Morning seb128 
[07:53] <oSoMoN> seb128, yes, and I'm glad it's not snap-specific
[08:06] <seb128> duflu, hey, how are you? Did you have a nice long weekend and managed to recover from the cold?
[08:07] <duflu> seb128, I'm doing better thanks. Yesterday was a disaster with unrelated problems but today is good. How are you?
[08:08] <seb128> duflu, I'm alright thanks!
[09:25] <seb128> jamesh, hey, weekly discourse post reminder! sorry to nag but I always enjoy reading about the nice improvement you are bringing us ;-)
[09:25] <jamesh> seb128: will do.
[09:25] <seb128> thanks!
[10:15] <GunnarHj> Hi seb128, can you pls approve fcitx5-gtk in the NEW upload queue?
[10:35] <oSoMoN> ricotz, FYI I just pushed to the firefox-beta.impish branch (https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.impish/revision/1430)
[10:41] <ricotz> oSoMoN, ack, I guess you will push this to the other branches too
[10:45] <oSoMoN> yes
[10:45] <ricotz> alright
[10:55] <KGB-2> gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor tags 5c2e59d Leo Antunes upstream/40 * Upstream version 40 * https://deb.li/jA4E
[10:55] <KGB-2> gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor pristine-tar 850e860 Leo Antunes gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor_40.orig.tar.gz.delta gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor_40.orig.tar.gz.id * pristine-tar data for gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor_40.orig.tar.gz * https://deb.li/3Z2ze
[11:30] <seb128> GunnarHj, hey, binaries accepted
[11:31] <GunnarHj> seb128: Thanks
[11:37] <seb128> np!
[14:00] <kenvandine> seb128: ready for some release bug triage?
[14:01] <seb128> kenvandine, oh yeah, we said we would do that on IRC!
[14:01] <kenvandine> :)
[14:01] <seb128> let's get started
[14:01] <seb128> reviewing rls-<...>-incoming bugs again, which we didn't do as regularly since we don't have IRC team meetings
[14:02] <kenvandine> seb128: which order? impish first? 
[14:02] <seb128> yes
[14:03] <seb128> that's the most important atm, so let's me sure we do that one
[14:03] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ii-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:03] <seb128> you want to lead or should I?
[14:03] <kenvandine> you please
[14:03] <seb128> alright
[14:03] <seb128> bug #1933828
[14:03] <seb128> it's assigned, just needs untagging
[14:04] <seb128> did we need to target impish?
[14:04] <kenvandine> i don't think so
[14:04] <kenvandine> it's OEM, we just need it for 22.04 right?
[14:04] <seb128> k, let me untag them
[14:04] <kenvandine> and maybe backport to focal?
[14:04] <seb128> I think so
[14:04] <seb128> focal is targetted
[14:04] <seb128> so we are fine
[14:04] <kenvandine> great
[14:05] <seb128> bug #1933828
[14:05] <seb128> bug #1845362
[14:05] <seb128> sorry
[14:06] <kenvandine> i've seen that in the snap as well
[14:06] <seb128> that's an annoying bug but I don't think the font viewer is important enough that we should consider it a release issue
[14:06] <kenvandine> agreed
[14:06] <seb128> it's also not new from this cycle so not a regression
[14:06] <kenvandine> and it doesn't seem to persist
[14:07] <seb128> right
[14:07] <seb128> notfixed it
[14:07] <seb128> bug #1935668
[14:07] <kenvandine> Trevinho has a PR there
[14:07] <seb128> notfixing, that's a transition that was postponed to next cycle
[14:08] <kenvandine> oh, great 
[14:08] <seb128> it's about moving main to fuse3
[14:08] <seb128> but yeah, thanks to Marco the components are in place
[14:08] <kenvandine> we'll need to do it soon though
[14:08] <seb128> so hopefully at the start of next cycle
[14:08] <seb128> right, it's jira tracked for next cycle
[14:09] <Trevinho> most of the stuff should be trivial to move, i don't expect issues in terms of breaking stuff too much, but indeed has to be done quickly
[14:09] <seb128> let's do it when J opens
[14:09] <seb128> hey Trevinho btw :)
[14:09] <Trevinho> heyyy :)
[14:09] <seb128> bug #1373069
[14:09] <kenvandine> i marked bug 1373069 as a dupe
[14:10] <Trevinho> one thing that I'm not sure about, is how to preserve them to be parallel installed, as fuseumount3 was called like this to be installed together...
[14:10] <Trevinho> buTTTT, in debian we've only a fuse package that is replaced by fuse3
[14:10] <Trevinho> o I'm a bit worried by stuff not in archive that may depend on libfuse and fuse tools 
[14:10] <seb128> same issue as discussed previously?
[14:10] <kenvandine> yes
[14:10] <kenvandine> this bug is technically older
[14:11] <kenvandine> but the other has more detail
[14:11] <kenvandine> so duped this
[14:11] <seb128> Trevinho, please add a comment about that on bug #1934510
[14:11] <kenvandine> 2014!
[14:11] <seb128> kenvandine, thanks
[14:11] <seb128> bug #1931958
[14:12] <seb128> technically it impacts libcamera which is in universe
[14:12] <seb128> notfixing?
[14:14] <kenvandine> yeah
[14:14] <kenvandine> we should get it soonish anyway?
[14:15] <seb128> the new gstreamer?
[14:15] <kenvandine> i assume we'll get that before 22.04?
[14:15] <seb128> unsure what's their release schedule, we had been on 1.18 for hirsute and impish
[14:15] <kenvandine> or not in debian?
[14:15] <seb128> 11.19 
[14:15] <kenvandine> oh... that stinks
[14:15] <seb128> 1.19 is in experimental
[14:15] <seb128> I guess 1.20 will be out before the LTS
[14:16] <seb128> but an easy fix if we care about libcamera is to disable -Werror=deprecated-declarations
[14:16] <seb128> that flag shouldn't be on in a release
[14:16] <kenvandine> agreed
[14:16] <seb128> that calls for that sort of issues when toolchain or depends are changing
[14:16] <seb128> k, let me take the bug and upload the flag change
[14:16] <kenvandine> but probably not worth changing this close to release?
[14:17] <kenvandine> i guess low risk :)
[14:17] <seb128> right
[14:17] <kenvandine> great
[14:17] <seb128> k, moving on
[14:17] <seb128> bug #1943816
[14:17] <seb128> I think we need to target that, in fact it's activity discussed on another channel as we speak
[14:17] <kenvandine> ok
[14:18] <seb128> it also mean today nvidia/wayland isn't enabled by default
[14:18] <kenvandine> yikes... then we need to
[14:18] <seb128> since it requires a configuration to be written to enable kms for wayland to work
[14:18] <seb128> and ubiquity doesn't do that
[14:18] <kenvandine> who can work on that?
[14:18] <seb128> also we get the wrong prime and power profile
[14:18] <seb128> I'm discussing it with Alberto and Dimitri
[14:18] <kenvandine> ok
[14:19] <seb128> so let me take it, even if I'm not the one working on the code change, I can at least make sure it's landing
[14:19] <seb128> bug #1933340
[14:19] <seb128> I don't think that's a release concern
[14:19] <kenvandine> nope
[14:20] <seb128> bug #1942031
[14:20] <seb128> Trevinho, ^ could you sort if out between you and Daniel?
[14:21] <seb128> sounds like one we should target, I've seen it as well on my ISO testing
[14:21] <seb128> when you click on 'try live session', according to Daniel the shell segfault on exit under X, which is default in a VM config
[14:21] <Trevinho> seb128: I feel it's due to cogl destruction I think i have a branch addressing it, not sure if still applies though
[14:21] <Trevinho> oh, so that's not on shutdown?
[14:22] <seb128> well, session closing
[14:22] <seb128> the installer is started in a gnome shell session in ubiquity mode
[14:22] <seb128> it you click on try ubuntu the session switch to the normal one
[14:22] <seb128> so I guess that goes to a close/change session path similar to shutdown?
[14:23] <seb128>  kenvandine do you agree we should track it?
[14:23] <kenvandine> seb128: yes
[14:23] <seb128> great
[14:23] <seb128> so that's it for ii incoming
[14:23] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ii-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:24] <seb128> bug #1938735
[14:25] <seb128> it's a but and seems fixed for 7.2.2, I don't think we got enough report to consider it a rls issue?
[14:27] <seb128> we lost Ken :p
[14:27] <kenvandine> sorry... no :)
[14:27] <kenvandine> not rls
[14:27] <seb128> agreed
[14:28] <seb128> bug #1934199
[14:29] <seb128> kenvandine, I think we missed the boat for impish there but that's not important for a non LTS right?
[14:29] <kenvandine> yeah
[14:29] <kenvandine> i thought there was code for this though
[14:29] <kenvandine> but not finding it right now
[14:30] <seb128> also it should be assigned to robert?
[14:30] <seb128> could you check with him the status and get to comment on the bug with a pointer to the code if he something ready for review?
[14:31] <kenvandine> yeah
[14:31] <seb128> tseliot, is bug #1925238 fixed now? it's speaking the udev rules, is that the gdm changes that landed in impish?
[14:32] <seb128> kenvandine, we are over the half hour and done with impish, we will need another session for stable series!
[14:32] <kenvandine> yeah, we were over due :)
[14:32] <kenvandine> or should we continue?
[14:32] <kenvandine> next meeting is just you and i anyway?
[14:34] <seb128> kenvandine, let's do a bit of hangout?
[14:34] <kenvandine> ok
[15:01] <laney> woohoo rls bugs
[15:02] <seb128> laney, hey! you are a bit late, you missed the fun
[15:02] <seb128> well, you can still read the backlog ;-)
[15:05] <kenvandine> laney!
[15:05] <laney> hey kenvandine hey seb128 
[15:36] <diddledani> I've poked wimpy about this, as it's an issue with ubuntu-mate primarily, but I've filed a patch that I think fixes a snapped apps triggering desktop notifications issue on mate desktop that has requested sponsorship https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mate-notification-daemon/+bug/1945234