[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-ews (impish-proposed/universe) [3.40.4-1 => 3.40.4-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[00:25] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Saw your message in #ubuntu-meeting. I haven't been receiving ISO failure emails. We eliminated a lot of applications a year ago, do we need to stop seeding more?
[00:42] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: the failure notification emails are configured to go to ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com, are they stuck in moderation perhaps?
[00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: libnih (impish-proposed/primary) [1.0.3-12]
[00:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnih [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.0.3-12]
[00:43] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Perhaps. I can look into that. That said, what can we do? The only changes we've made since the 26th have been removals (albiet small) anyhow.
[00:45] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: as far as removing packages, I don't know what has changed but 4GiB is the maximum file size on an isofs, so the squashfs must be smaller than this; exactly how you manage the contents of the default install is certainly a flavor team decision
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnih [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-12] (no packageset)
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnih [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-12] (no packageset)
[00:52] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Is it possible to increase the ISO file size beyond that? I have reason to believe people don't exactly burn directly to DVD anymore but to USB flash drives.
[00:54] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: it's a limit of the iso filesystem standard, not something changeable.  This is not about the size of the ISO but a size limit on individual files within the ISO
[00:54] <Eickmeyer> I see, much like FAT32.
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnih [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-12] (no packageset)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnih [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-12] (no packageset)
[00:56] <vorlon> fwiw when I diff the manifests, I see a bunch of new xfce packages being pulled in
[00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnih [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.0.3-12]
[00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnih [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1.0.3-12]
[00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnih [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.0.3-12]
[00:57] <vorlon> er no I don't, I'm looking at the diff backwards and these are xfce packages that have been dropped
[00:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnih [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1.0.3-12]
[00:58] <vorlon> so, effectively, this is a question of regular package growth; you've hit an immovable threshold, and there's really no way to build a release image without dropping something from the default install
[01:01] <vorlon> RAOF: so, does this mean lomiri-app-launch is unsupportable in Ubuntu because of new MIR?
[01:02] <RAOF> vorlon: Correct.
[01:03] <RAOF> Well, we could upload a separate mir1.x source package, which would provide the necessary things.
[01:03] <vorlon> RAOF: well, that doesn't seem like something we should volunteer to maintain just to support these Debian packages
[01:04] <RAOF> That was my thinking, yes.
[01:05] <RAOF> Lomiri upstream will eventually migrate to Mir 2.x. It's just the usual resource constraints.
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnih [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-12] (no packageset)
[01:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-meta (impish-proposed/universe) [0.248 => 0.249] (ubuntustudio)
[01:58] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I removed a few things from the seed, hopefully that will work.
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (impish-proposed) [0.249]
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-download-manager [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-8] (no packageset)
[03:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dovecot [source] (focal-proposed) [1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.5]
[04:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnih [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1.0.3-12]
[04:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-download-manager [armhf] (impish-proposed) [0.1.0-8]
[04:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strongswan [source] (focal-proposed) [5.8.2-1ubuntu3.2]
[04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strongswan [source] (hirsute-proposed) [5.9.1-1ubuntu1.1]
[04:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.3-1ubuntu3]
[05:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.3]
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-11 (impish-proposed/main) [1:11.0.1-2ubuntu6 => 1:11.1.0-4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gridengine (impish-proposed/universe) [8.1.9+dfsg-9.1ubuntu1 => 8.1.9+dfsg-10] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gridengine [sync] (impish-proposed) [8.1.9+dfsg-10]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.4] (core)
[08:24] <fheimes> @ubuntu-sru: there are two pairs of s390-tools / s390-tools-signed packages in the hirsute and focal unapproved queue, please could you have a look and ideally approve? thx
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (impish-proposed/main) [1.200 => 1.201] (core, kernel)
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.23 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.24~uefi2] (core)
[09:55] <juliank> ^ please reject
[09:55] <juliank> this one was for https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
[10:05]  * didrocks flushes
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.24~uefi2]
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (impish-proposed/universe) [0.13.03-1 => 0.13.04-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.13.04-1]
[11:55] <xnox> RAOF:  i guess similar with lorimi upload/download managers depending on libnih for dbus bindings stuff instead of using, anything else.
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dnsmasq (bionic-proposed/main) [2.79-1ubuntu0.4 => 2.79-1ubuntu0.5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-tweak-tool (impish-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+-0ubuntu6 => 0.0.7+-0ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-tweak-tool [source] (impish-proposed) [0.0.7+-0ubuntu7]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (focal-proposed/main) [1.187.17 => 1.187.18] (core, kernel)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcamera (impish-proposed/universe) [0~git20200629+e7aa92a-8 => 0~git20200629+e7aa92a-9] (no packageset)
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcamera [source] (impish-proposed) [0~git20200629+e7aa92a-9]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [0~git20200629+e7aa92a-9] (no packageset)
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apertium (impish-proposed/universe) [3.7.1-1 => 3.7.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apertium [source] (impish-proposed) [3.7.1-1ubuntu1]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop-environment [source] (impish-proposed) [0.16.3]
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-ews [source] (impish-proposed) [3.40.4-1ubuntu1]
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdrm [sync] (impish-proposed) [2.4.107-8]
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (impish-proposed) [21.2.2-1ubuntu1]
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.38]
[16:27] <vorlon> Eickmeyer[m]: so this is not a release-blocking issue by any means, but I think it's absurd that the ardour Debian release has added lintian overrides for spelling errors in the source code, in the same upload that it has updated a patch called debian/patches/0200-spelling.patch do address additional spelling errors
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.18]
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3.2]
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ardour [sync] (impish-proposed) [1:6.9.0+ds0-1]
[16:33] <falcojr> rbasak: cloud-init has an SRU for B, F and H per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1940871 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1939603. If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete
[16:33] <falcojr> not sure if the "7 days" requirement is for calendar date or the full amount of time that happened, but the last two 2 commits were uploaded 7 days ago about 3 hours from now :)
[16:34] <falcojr> but the rest of the SRU has been in proposed longer
[16:35] <bdmurray> tjaalton: What's the reasoning behind the linux-firmware update for Impish given that bug 1945227 says it'll be skipped for impish?
[16:36] <rbasak> falcojr: sorry, I won't get to it today. In between qemu and ua-tools I'm out of time.
[16:36] <falcojr> no problem, thanks!
[16:36] <bdmurray> falcojr: I'll add it to my list for the day
[16:37] <falcojr> thanks!
[16:50] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept llvm-toolchain-11, fixes a mesa regression
[16:50] <LocutusOfBorg> debian bug: 989545
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-ugly1.0 [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.18.5-1]
[16:52] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: which one 0-4 or 0-2?
[17:22] <tjaalton> bdmurray: just that it's available at least on the devel series. looks like I didn't know the fw was upstream when filing the bug :)
[17:25] <LocutusOfBorg> 0-4 bdmurray has also gcc- build failure and autopkgtest fixes
[17:25] <LocutusOfBorg> latter is better :D
[17:25] <tjaalton> and since this hw will release before 22.04, 21.10 will likely be used by enthusiasts with a mainline kernel or such
[17:26] <tjaalton> (dropped impish from the description)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (impish-proposed) [1.201]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xrdp (impish-proposed/universe) [0.9.15-1 => 0.9.15-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xrdp [source] (impish-proposed) [0.9.15-1ubuntu1]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected llvm-toolchain-11 [sync] (impish-proposed) [1:11.1.0-2]
[17:56] <sergiodj> ubuntu-archive: hi there.  I'd like to get https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/408965 while we don't have a final fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1944004, so that docker.io/containerd can finally migrate
[17:56] <sergiodj> thanks
[17:57] <bdmurray> sergiodj: that's actually something for ubuntu-release
[17:57] <sergiodj> bdmurray: ah, sorry.  I thought "ubuntu-release" in my head, but pinged ubuntu-archive
[17:58] <sergiodj> thanks
[18:05] <bdmurray> sergiodj: That snapd task is fixed does it still need hinting?
[18:06] <sergiodj> bdmurray: there's another ongoing issue with snapd being handled by the CPC team
[18:06] <bdmurray> ah right that sounds familiar
[18:07] <sergiodj> bdmurray: in theory we can wait until everything is solved, but docker.io has been blocked in -proposed for a long time now and I'd like to get it in release "before it's too late" (TM)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (impish-proposed/main) [2.740 => 2.741] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (impish-proposed/main) [2021a-1ubuntu1 => 2021a-2ubuntu1] (core)
[19:44] <bdmurray> vorlon: do you want to have a look at tzdata?
[19:45] <vorlon> ok
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (impish-proposed) [2.741]
[19:48] <vorlon> bdmurray: why are there so many changes to the icu data?
[19:49] <vorlon> bdmurray: I guess this is the "update them to 2021a1" referred to; does this mean in 2021a-1ubuntu1 they had not been updated?
[19:51] <vorlon> schopin: LP: #1940077> a bug is filed in Ubuntu referencing the Debian bug asking not to use a uml backend in Ubuntu since it doesn't work; however, the backend options are auto, kvm, and uml, and kvm doesn't work reliably on the autopkgtest runners because the runners are themselves VMs and nested KVM isn't supported.  What do you think we should do to get this package unstuck from -proposed?
[19:56] <bdmurray> vorlon: no, they had been updated to 2021a - I pulled in this update https://github.com/unicode-org/icu-data/commit/b5e34a13cd05e56fea406f597e8f257860f0dad2
[19:56] <vorlon> ok
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (impish-proposed) [2021a-2ubuntu1]
[20:53] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I'm inclined to agree. Would you like me to pass that along to the debian-multimedia team?
[20:54] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: please :)
[21:01] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Done.
[21:01] <Eickmeyer> As in, email sent.
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (hirsute-proposed/main) [2021a-1ubuntu1 => 2021a-2ubuntu0.21.04] (core)
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-sound (impish-proposed/universe) [12.10.2+18.10.20180612-0ubuntu3 => 12.10.2+18.10.20180612-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2021a-0ubuntu0.20.04 => 2021a-2ubuntu0.20.04] (core)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream (impish-proposed/main) [0.14.4-1 => 0.14.5-1] (core) (sync)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-generator (impish-proposed/universe) [0.8.4-1 => 0.8.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted appstream-generator [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.8.5-1]
[22:02] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^ the above are a fix for an appstream-generator ftbfs in -proposed that's been stuck there for 153 days; the newer versions in unstable that fix this problem seem like reasonable minor release updates to me, but it's worth having a second opinion from the release team so I haven't self-accepted appstream
[22:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted appstream [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.14.5-1]
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [s390x] (impish-proposed/main) [0.14.5-1] (core)
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/main) [0.14.5-1] (core)
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [armhf] (impish-proposed/main) [0.14.5-1] (core)
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [arm64] (impish-proposed/main) [0.14.5-1] (core)
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [arm64] (impish-proposed) [0.14.5-1]
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [armhf] (impish-proposed) [0.14.5-1]
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [0.14.5-1]
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [s390x] (impish-proposed) [0.14.5-1]
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (bionic-proposed/main) [2021a-0ubuntu0.18.04 => 2021a-2ubuntu0.18.04] (core)
[22:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: appstream [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [0.14.5-1] (core)
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted appstream [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.14.5-1]
[22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (xenial-proposed/main) [2021a-0ubuntu0.16.04 => 2021a-2ubuntu0.16.04] (core)