[00:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cd-boot-images-arm64 (impish-proposed/main) [12 => 13] (desktop-core)
[00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460 from i386-whitelist in impish
[00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed qtwayland-opensource-src from i386-whitelist in impish
[01:24] <bdmurray> I did end up adding sbcl to big_packages to see what would happen as I was getting inconsistent results. I then retried the test but who knows when that will happen now.
[01:26] <sarnold> bdmurray: what does big_packages affect? sometime in the last N months I heard that we don't have a big-packages vs small-packages disctinction in a service that I certainly thought we had one :) it's been driving me crazy since..
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (impish-proposed) [17]
[01:28] <bdmurray> sarnold: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#autopkgtests it affects the autopkgtest environment
[01:28] <sarnold> thanks :LD
[01:29] <bdmurray> we run things by default on something similar to a small unit but the debian autopkgtest env has more resources
[01:29] <bdmurray> so if it fails in ubuntu and passes in debian maybe that's why
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-arm64 [source] (impish-proposed) [13]
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-ppc64el [source] (impish-proposed) [10]
[01:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.55 => 2.525.56] (desktop-core)
[02:14] <mwhudson> bdmurray: unfortunately there are 3000 things ahead of it in the queues it seems :(
[05:57] <ginggs> vorlon: the dpkg-dev there includes usage-wrapper.py, so we get the [06:09] <ginggs> same as the first impish test rebuild
[06:12] <vorlon> ginggs: ok, not something I was familiar with; why is this something to have in test rebuilds if not in regular rebuilds?
[06:21] <ginggs> vorlon: i don't know the history, doko can probably explain better
[06:23] <vorlon> bdmurray: found a regression as a result of using --nuninst-cache, so I'm reverting it until I can look further
[06:24] <vorlon> bdmurray: also, found that with a large number of pending autopkgtest results, pulling the sqlite db DOES have a performance benefit, so https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+merge/409902
[06:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1ubuntu2~ubuntu18.04.1 => 4.15.0-2ubuntu1.4] (core)
[07:05] <locutusofborg> vorlon, I think the llvm-toolchain changes are safe, moving from cmake to ninja should only make build faster, and the diff of the new release was already included in debian/patches, so its just a "cleaner" packages with autopkgtest fixes made by me
[07:06] <locutusofborg> doko, where is the bug for gdk-pixbuf? I'm of course interested in a fix :)
[07:34] <utkarsh2102> tjaalton: hiya, could you please (SRU) review the cloud-init uploads for LP: #1938299? This is a hotfix and we need them at the earliest to get the GKE images working again.
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (impish-proposed/main) [2.53+21.10 => 2.53+21.10ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[07:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (impish-proposed) [2.53+21.10ubuntu1]
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ddtp-translations (impish-proposed/universe) [20211006.1 => 20211008.1] (no packageset)
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ddtp-translations [source] (impish-proposed) [20211008.1]
[08:15] <juliank> There is some weirdness going on with rabbitmq reporting queues to be empty / we counting them as empty
[08:15] <juliank> They bounce back though
[08:16] <juliank> So if you look at running autopkgtests, things might look weird, and the graphs jump up and down
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-plugins (impish-proposed/main) [1.2.2-2build1 => 1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:35] <tjaalton> utkarsh2102: ok let me check
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (focal-proposed/main) [1.16.6-2~20.04 => 1.16.6-3~20.04] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: modemmanager (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.16.6-2~21.04 => 1.16.6-3~21.04] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:40] <paride> mwhudson, dbungert, I baked the edge subiquity snap in an impish-live-server image and now the preseeding works
[09:42] <paride> If I read https://launchpadlibrarian.net/562419867/buildlog_ubuntu_impish_amd64_ubuntu-server-live_BUILDING.txt.gz correctly it's always the stable/ubuntu-21.10 subiquity that gets included into the images
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (impish-proposed/main) [1.28.6-1 => 1.28.6-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:43] <paride> oh the fixes should be there already
[09:43] <paride> so in theory we just need to wait for a daily rebuild
[09:45] <paride> and the next daily build should happen ~soon
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (hirsute-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~21.04.4]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.28.6-1~21.04 => 1.28.6-1~21.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:47] <paride> the livefs build is not yet fully clear to me, I tried to create my own via https://launchpad.net/~paride/+new-livefs/ but apparently I don't have permissions for that
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqmi (focal-proposed/main) [1.28.6-1~20.04 => 1.28.6-1~20.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~20.04.4]
[09:49] <paride> I guess I need to be a member of https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-livefs-builders for that,
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (impish-proposed/main) [1.2.4-2ubuntu4 => 1.2.4-2ubuntu5] (core)
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [21.3-1-g6803368d-0ubuntu1~18.04.4]
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.2.4-2ubuntu1.3 => 1.2.4-2ubuntu1.4] (core)
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.10 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.11] (no packageset)
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.11 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.12] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:14.2-1ubuntu1.1 => 1:14.2-1ubuntu1.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dh-elpa (impish-proposed/universe) [2.0.8 => 2.0.8ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dh-elpa [source] (impish-proposed) [2.0.8ubuntu1]
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: liburing (impish-proposed/main) [0.7-3ubuntu2 => 0.7-3ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[12:01] <utkarsh2102> tjaalton: thank you so much! \o/
[12:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.10 (impish-proposed/universe) [3.10.0~rc2-1build1 => 3.10.0-1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.10 [source] (impish-proposed) [3.10.0-1]
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (impish-proposed/main) [1:91.1.2+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:91.2.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (impish-proposed/main) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-plugins [source] (impish-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted liburing [source] (impish-proposed) [0.7-3ubuntu3]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (impish-proposed) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[13:49] <paride> dbungert, hi! is there as far as you know a way to set the *installer* ssh password via answers.yaml?
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (impish-proposed/main) [0.8.17 => 0.8.17.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:29] <dbungert> paride: those installer passwords are rough
[14:29] <dbungert> I'll look into it
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.5-0ubuntu2~21.04.1 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu3~21.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (focal-proposed/main) [1.5.5-0ubuntu2~20.04.1 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu3~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:58] <sil2100> paride: hey! A quick heads up re: server images FYI, tseliot_ will be uploading a new ubuntu-drivers-common that will now start recommending nvidia-prime
[14:58] <sil2100> This will mean that nvidia-prime will be pulled into server images as well
[14:59] <sil2100> Apparently the package is only 53k and has no additional dependencies, so the footprint should be relatively small
[14:59] <sil2100> jchittum: FYI as well ^
[15:00] <paride> sil2100, ok, thanks!
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.3 => 1.5.5-0ubuntu3~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:00] <paride> in general the images look good, *however* it seems that the ppc64el system is failing to do the post-install reboot automatically
[15:01] <paride> when I do things manually, it works
[15:01] <paride> I'm investigating
[15:05] <vorlon> sil2100: btw, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.html hasn't been cleaned up (for more than a cycle - I was hoping these new lib deps might go away again).  Any objections to me doing that cleaning now before RC?
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (impish-proposed/main) [1:0.9.2.1 => 1:0.9.2.2] (desktop-core)
[15:05] <vorlon> important vs required potentially has some impact on some debootstrap operations, but a) not the ones we use in the image builds iirc b) they're hard dependencies of libpam anyway so they have to get pulled in at some point...
[15:09] <vorlon> sil2100, tseliot_: I don't understand the recommends: nvidia-prime, here; "so that it's included in the image" doesn't seem like a correct rationale, especially wrt it being installed in the /target/ by ubiquity/target-config/31ubuntu_driver_package
[15:09] <vorlon> +s
[15:14] <sil2100> vorlon: +1 on cleaning it up o/
[15:16] <jchittum> sil2100: thank you for the heads up
[15:16] <sil2100> vorlon: as for the recommends, tseliot_ can give the full rationale but from what he mentioned he said it needs to be installed on the livefs as otherwise ubuntu-drivers doesn't do what it's intended when it's not present, and we'll be now using ubuntu-drivers for the actual driver package installation
[15:17] <sil2100> I think we're failing to set KMS when nvidia-prime is not available in the ubiquity session?
[15:17] <vorlon> sil2100: ok - trying to understand exactly what it is that is "doing what's intended", to make sure that's something which will be correctly copied to the target system
[15:17] <vorlon> so we don't have to have a follow-on upload
[15:20] <sil2100> Yeah, let's wait for tseliot_, I'd have to check the ubuntu-drivers code myself to get a bit more context - might do that after the meeting
[15:21] <bdmurray> Is it not this 'chroot /target prime-select on-demand </dev/null'
[15:22] <vorlon> bdmurray: if it's the chroot, then... it doesn't require a recommends to have it in the live session, it just requires ensuring it's in the pool and gets installed to the target
[15:22] <vorlon> (there is already code to apt install it, but nothing puts it in the pool)
[15:23] <vorlon> the ubuntu-drivers command does also call prime-select on-demand in the live session if prime-select is present; but I'm not sure all that state is correctly copied to the target
[15:23] <vorlon> (or, if we call chroot /target prime-select again anyway, what the value is of also having it in the live session)
[15:29] <sil2100> tseliot_: ^
[15:31] <tseliot_> vorlon, I suspect we want things to work even without an internet connection
[15:59] <vorlon> tseliot-: I agree that we do, but that's why we have the apt pool on the images, which is separate from what's in the live session
[16:00] <vorlon> so if the only reason for this added recommends is to ensure the package is available for inclusion in the target, then I don't think the recommends is the right solution
[16:02] <tseliot__> vorlon, what do you recommend then? We only need nvidia-prime in the target chroot. It's ok if it's not in the live session (on the host)
[16:03] <vorlon> tseliot__: then we should just seed it in the apt pool
[16:03] <tseliot__> vorlon, ok, can you do that, please? I'll revert the dependency
[16:03] <vorlon> tseliot__: sure thing
[16:03] <tseliot__> thanks
[16:05] <sil2100> vorlon, tseliot__: ok, I see there will be another u-d-c upload, so let me reject it from the queue for now
[16:05] <tseliot__> thanks
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [1:0.9.2.2]
[16:09] <vorlon> tseliot__, sil2100: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/commit/?id=9a78668d1a58cd5cd25fb49ef1d54b54161ef9cf easy peasy
[16:09] <tseliot__> vorlon, excellent, thanks
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (impish-proposed/main) [1:0.9.2.1 => 1:0.9.2.2] (desktop-core)
[16:14] <bdmurray> How did livecd-rootfs become an unsubscribed package?
[16:17]  * vorlon blinks
[16:18] <vorlon> tseliot__: last thing to confirm, you have 'cp /run/nvidia_runtimepm_supported /target/run/nvidia_runtimepm_supported' which will fail if /run/nvidia_runtimepm_supported doesn't exist in the live session.  are you comfortable that this is guaranteed to be present?
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.4-2ubuntu1.4]
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.11]
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:14.2-1ubuntu1.2]
[16:26] <tseliot__> vorlon, I have if [ -e /run/nvidia_runtimepm_supported ]; then before that
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.12]
[16:26] <vorlon> tseliot__: oh duh, you sure do - thanks
[16:26] <tseliot__> better safe than sorry, thanks for asking
[16:27] <vorlon> sil2100: ^^ u-d-c accepted, I haven't reviewed nvidia-prime and am going into a meeting now
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (impish-proposed) [1:0.9.2.2]
[16:29] <sil2100> vorlon: ok, I'll review it in 5 mins!
[16:29] <sil2100> Thanks!
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-terminal [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3.38.1-1ubuntu1.1]
[16:43] <sil2100> Oh, there's some cruft in that upload, but I can reupload that
[16:49] <sil2100> Ok, looks sane, let me re-upload after a quick cleanup and accept
[16:50] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'd be happy to take a look and do the accept.
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (impish-proposed/main) [0.8.17 => 0.8.17.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:54] <sil2100> bdmurray: ^ here you go. Basically this removes a .buildinfo file from the previous upload
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-prime [source] (impish-proposed) [0.8.17.1]
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpandoc-wrapper-perl (impish-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1 => 0.9.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpandoc-wrapper-perl [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xrt [source] (focal-proposed) [202020.2.8.743-0ubuntu1~20.04]
[17:01] <bdmurray> sil2100: https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/409403 this has been handy
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-prime [source] (impish-proposed) [0.8.17.1]
[17:01] <sil2100> Looking
[17:02] <sil2100> Ooooh
[17:02] <sil2100> This sounds like a good idea, but maybe if we do it like this... should we change the name (later) to something like queue-review instead?
[17:03] <sil2100> We could make it the-tool for queue reviews in overall, later adding some NEW package review help to it etc.
[17:03] <bdmurray> Yeah, probably.
[17:03] <sil2100> Let me review that in a minute
[17:06] <sil2100> And I'll also update the tracking doc to be more verbose about our status now
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zzzeeksphinx (impish-proposed/universe) [1.1.6-1 => 1.1.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zzzeeksphinx [source] (impish-proposed) [1.1.6-1ubuntu1]
[17:28] <sil2100> bdmurray: merged o/
[17:28] <sil2100> Okay, I need to go AFK now for a bit, I'll be back later
[17:37] <xnox> sil2100:  vorlon: any ability to increase autopkgtest quota / workers at the expense of anything else? (launchpad builders)?
[17:37] <xnox> not sure, if adt will finish before release
[17:38] <vorlon> not sure we care
[17:38] <vorlon> if there are specific things that are release-critical that need to get in, let me know and I'll jigger as necessary
[17:42] <vorlon> I think the queues might need dumped anyway, there's far more in the queue than what britney is waiting for
[17:42] <bdmurray> vorlon: I'd be curious to see if sbcl and glibc passes now that I added sbcl to big packages
[17:47] <vorlon> the other thing is, rabbitmq is giving us a hard time, the queues sometimes appear empty, and sometimes removals from the queue seem to not take effect.  I'm going to check if restarting, after flushing, does any good
[17:52] <vorlon> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#queue-huge-impish-amd64 <- e.g. I've flushed that twice and there are still items in the queue >_<
[17:52] <vorlon> but I've also restarted rabbit and now it's no longer taking 100% CPU so that's hopeful
[18:10] <vorlon> xnox, bdmurray: linux, glibc-related tests have been bumped to the front of the queue; followed by everything uploaded in the past day; followed by everything else (still loading these back into the queue)
[18:12] <vorlon> further twiddling possible, but should probably let the workers chew on the current set for a while before resetting everything again
[18:14] <vorlon> afk for ~1h
[18:14] <vorlon> oh, and a side effect of the way retry-autopkgtest-regressions works, various tests will now be run only once with consolidated triggers
[18:14] <vorlon> which should be fine for what are meant to be no-change uploads
[18:14] <vorlon> and leave us with a smaller queue overall
[18:32] <sergiodj> vorlon: I'm not expecting you to act on this today, but the u-a-t team spent some time improving the Test Case section of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1942929.  personally, I feel like they did a great job here and wrote extensive and informative tests, but we would love to hear your opinion (whenever you're able to form one, of course)
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (impish-proposed/main) [21.10.8 => 21.10.9] (desktop-core)
[20:09] <bdmurray> ^- vorlon
[20:12]  * vorlon is unimpressed that the britney notest run takes 48 minutes
[20:12] <vorlon> bdmurray: accepted, thanks
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (impish-proposed) [21.10.9]
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-ishidawataru-sctp [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.0+git20190723.7c296d4-3~ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-ishidawataru-sctp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0+git20190723.7c296d4-3~ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2:18.1.1-0ubuntu2]
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-compute-engine-oslogin [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20210907.00-0ubuntu1~21.04.0]
[22:12] <vorlon> bdmurray: well, sbcl retries looking rather hung
[22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20.10.7-0ubuntu5~21.04.1]
[22:29] <vorlon> bdmurray: I think it's time to force-reset-test sbcl and let glibc through
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (focal-proposed) [20.10.7-0ubuntu5~20.04.1]
[22:54] <sil2100> yay \o/
[23:01] <xnox> vorlon:  based on kpi graphs when do you think the autopkgtests will finish? By tuesday?
[23:58] <vorlon> xnox: ¯\_(シ)_/¯