[06:33] I have a couple if crash files [06:34] chris_uk[m], you should be able to submit then with `ubuntu-bug /var/crash/[name of crashfile].crash` [06:35] in beta 21.10 var/crash named _usr_ bin_ autojack.120. crash and _ usr_ bin_ autojack.1000. crash [06:36] Thanks [06:36] Will do. [07:06] Experiencing some problem sending the crash files. Getting message in Aport ' The Application Studio Controls has closed unexpectedly.' [07:06] And in Konsole message: 'QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_ DUR not set, defaulting to ' /tmp/runtime-root' [07:06] Have sent error message via Aport [07:07] Should be RUNTIME_ DIR [08:03] Good Morning! [08:05] May I ask, if there is a documentation regarding the compiling of Ardour6 on ubuntustudio? [15:02] frank_: There is none [15:02] frank_: I am assuming you are using a git pull from github? [15:03] frank_: if you look at: https://nightly.ardour.org/i/A_Linux_x86_64/build_log.txt [15:04] you can see the ./waf configure line used. [15:05] when you run that line, it will most likely fail because of missing deps. Most likely you will just need the *-dev package of those libs. Keep adding them until configure passes all the way through [15:06] then ./waf will build [15:10] frank_: please note this will not give you a build that waf install will put in the same place as a pre built binary from ardour.org or ubuntu [15:10] frank_: also please note that the current github version of Ardour is not useable. [15:11] waf install will put things in /usr/local/ [15:12] If you want to build for testing only, it is best to run ardour from the build directory. [15:13] run from */ardour/gtk2_ardour/ardev [15:16] Or for debugging, remove the --optimize from your configure line to build a debug version and run */ardour/gtk2_ardour/ardbg [15:17] frank_: if any of this does not make sense to you, I would sugest using either the Ardour version from the ubuntu repositories or downloading the version(s) from ardour.org [15:19] chris_uk[m]: before you worry about this problem in studio-controls make sure you have the latest version 2.2.6, the older version has a known problem. [15:45] OvenWerks @OvenWerks:libera.chat I do have Studio Controls 2.2.6. [15:47] chris_uk[m]: if you run autojack from a terminal do you have the output? [16:22] anyone knows where/when snd-seq-dummy is loaded ? [16:22] I'm on 21.10 (cause I borked a 21.04 install .. I'm special) [16:23] rgh: are you missing it, or want it not to load? [16:23] I don [16:23] s/don/want it not to load/ [16:24] I would expect it gets loaded when midi devices are around... but then midi stuff is there even with no midi device... so I would guess at boot. [16:24] if you want it not to load, blacklist it. [16:25] I do not know if there are other seq modules that depend on that or not [16:26] modprobe -r will fail if another module depends on it [16:28] gotcha [16:36] OvenWerks @OvenWerks:libera.chat I get this output: [16:36] fozzy@fozzy-systemproductname:~$ autojack|pastebinit Can't open ALSA playback device 'hw:NVidia,0,0'. Can't open ALSA capture device 'hw:NVidia,0,0'. [16:38] I would not think that would cause a crash... at least not of autojack. I would think that is likely zita-a2j [16:40] I use a Focusrite 6i6 2nd gen [16:40] It seems normal, zita-a2j (or jackdbus) will find that your monitor does not have a capture device and in zita-a2j just not run or in jackdbus' case run as output only. [16:41] ok so master is usb [16:41] Studio Controls is working OK in this beta. [16:42] I can' t see any problems in general. [16:42] if you open studio-controls, and look at the Extra Devices tab, select your nvidia device. The capture port count will probably be 100. [16:43] if you set it to 0 that error message should go away [16:43] Yes, master is the Focusrite. [16:43] (easiest way is to hit All twice. [16:44] So the problem above (crash report) is gone now? [16:46] chris_uk[m]: there was a problem (about two days ago) with version 2.2.5 that caused a crash in autojack. The crash report may be a left over from that [16:46] I haven' t got the Nvidia drivers in use yet. [16:46] Just tried to lower the capture port count to 0 and I got a crash notification. The + and - bi [16:47] Interesting [16:47] box is now greyed out so can' t lower it. [16:47] it can't go lower than 0 [16:48] It is still on 99 [16:48] But greyed out [16:48] So with a crash report does that mean you can't close the gui? (close button in the lower right) [16:49] Yes, it closes the whole studio controls. [16:50] so on restart, is that button available again? [16:50] Maybe run studio-controls from a terminal might give some more info [16:51] Yes, it is available [16:52] If you click the All beside it should turn to off, then click that and the number should go to 0 [16:52] * OvenWerks needs to make that show off if the number is not 0 [16:53] Yes, it goes 0 [16:54] apply should make that permanent [16:54] Ok [16:54] you may wish the playback to be 0 as well if you don't ever use that output. [16:55] I can't get the +/- arrows to crash here [16:55] Ok. Done [16:55] So I am not sure what happened in your case [16:56] it is hard to know which way to default things for first time use [16:56] Do you want the terminal output? [16:56] are there errors? [16:56] I am looking for traceback lines [16:57] TypeError. [16:57] Yeah I would like that then [16:58] it is probably the last traceback line. It should have a line number [17:01] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/studio-controls", line 1039, in xdev_changed [17:03] Here is more [17:03] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/studio-controls", line 1039, in xdev_changed sub_db['rate'] = int(self.xdev_rate_drop.get_active_id()) TypeError: int() argument must be a string, a bytes-like object or a number, not 'NoneType' [17:05] interesting so the sample rate in the dropdown is not set. [17:05] actually.... why would we save that at all? [17:06] Oh we don't. [17:08] Sample rate greyed out in Extra devices [17:09] And is empty (not set) [17:11] Yes, that makes sense... it is (or seems to be) the same problem we just fixed in autojack. [17:13] There are no rates found in the codec#0 file... [17:13] well actually, this being hdmi, they would be in an excluded part of the file [17:14] Eickmeyer: ^^^ [17:14] chris_uk[m]: thank you for testing [17:14] Ok [17:15] is it possible to run ubuntu-bug studio-controls [17:15] and add in the above traceback? [17:15] Final Freeze is in effect. [17:15] (in the description) [17:16] Eickmeyer: ok [17:16] I will fix anyway. can backports be activated for 21.10 now? [17:18] So no need for Ubuntu-bug? [17:21] "I will fix anyway. can backports..." <- We *might* be able to sneak it into the release if a good case is made. [17:22] chris_uk[m]: It's still needed. [17:53] Ok [18:00] Suitable summary description for bug? [18:03] studio-controls hangs? [18:03] studio-controls hangs on apply? [18:03] Ok [18:04] command line out is: and the stuff above. [18:06] Done [18:07] What is the bug number? [18:09] Just logged out. [18:09] ok, I will wait it should show up in my mailbox soon [18:09] I will log back in [18:10] Where do I login? [18:14] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/studio-controls/+bug/1946572 [18:14] Launchpad bug 1946572 in studio-controls (Ubuntu) "Studio controls hangs on Apply" [Undecided, New] [18:16] chris_uk[m]: it is ok, I found it. [18:17] Thanks Ubottu. [18:19] chris_uk[m]: if you wish, you can download https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ovenwerks/studio-controls/master/usr/bin/studio-controls [18:19] and run this from the commandline to see if this fixes things [18:20] I guess you would need to cp it into /usr/bin for it to work right [18:21] If we are getting too difficult for you, I guess testing can wait... unless Eickmeyer can duplicate this [18:24] It is too difficult. [18:24] no problem [18:24] most people are not comfortable with a lot of commandline things [18:28] Does ubuntu-bug command automatically collect the contents of the terminal? [18:28] no, [18:29] The only place that happened was because you added it [18:29] Di you have what you need? [18:29] if the crash icon shows up and you send a bug from there then it does. [18:30] Yes there is already a fix uploaded. When it gets to the package state I don't know. [18:30] Right. [18:31] I can't really test it here because my system doesn't show that bug. [23:24] chris_uk[m]: Is there any chance I can get you to update the bug description with a description of the behavior?