xnoxbdmurray:  vorlon: please hint https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/impish/update_excuses.html#tp-smapi to migrate. It is being restricted from arch:all to arch:amd64 and thus will never pass arm64 autopkgtest anymore.00:52
xnoxwhich is currently held up as a regression00:52
bdmurrayxnox: doing so00:54
xnoxbdmurray:  poked src:linux adt-matrix results. Lots of missing. And hinted over linux-aws one, which should get unblocked now too.01:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: testssl.sh (impish-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg1-1 => 3.0.6+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync)04:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted testssl.sh [sync] (impish-proposed) [3.0.6+dfsg1-1]04:33
sigvIf an upload was sponsored, as noted by "Unapproved: gist (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-4 => 5.0.0-4ubuntu1]" above, but there is no "verification pending" message on LP: #1940907 -- should I be worried? Is there some hidden step between "sponsor upload" and "start SRU verification process" which was lost along the way here?06:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1940907 in gist (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Authentication/Authorization broken due to GitHub platform changes" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194090706:10
juliankWe haven't built an impish image on amd64 lgw since the 28th, it got stuck on the 29th, restarted the process now06:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: knockpy (impish-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1 => 5.2.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim-bitbake (impish-proposed/universe) [0~git20200915-1 => 0~git20210803-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockpy [sync] (impish-proposed) [5.2.0-1]06:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vim-bitbake [sync] (impish-proposed) [0~git20210803-1]06:51
juliankA new autopkgtest image for impish amd64 has been built on lgw01 now, so both amd64 clouds are running uptodate images now06:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (impish-proposed/main) [2.8.4-4ubuntu1 => 2.8.7-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)07:18
sil2100I'll disable 21.10 dailies for now o/08:05
sil2100We still don't have all we need for release candidates, but we might have stuff migrating soon08:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (impish-proposed/main) [11.1ubuntu4 => 11.1ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist)08:46
seb128sil2100, what's the deal with the arm64 autopkgtest backlog? we still have 160 desktop packages on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html that need to migrate08:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (impish-proposed) [11.1ubuntu5]09:03
RAOFsigv: the upload was sponsored into the focal-unapproved queue. The next step is an SRU team member processing the queue and accepting it into -proposed.09:03
sil2100seb128: we're working on getting it down for now, we'll be dropping quite a few that we think are irrelevant from the backlog in a moment09:30
sil2100It's still the fallback fron the no-change rebuilds sadly09:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-tweak-tool (impish-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 => 0.0.7+-0ubuntu9] (no packageset)09:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-tweak-tool [source] (impish-proposed) [0.0.7+-0ubuntu9]09:40
juliankWe are skipping autopkgtests for various no-change zstd rebuilds of meta packages like java-common and  ruby-defaults09:42
juliankarm64 queues are _long_ :(09:42
juliankseb128: We now have about 2k tests remainining, it was 3k before I dropped the metapackage-triggered runs09:53
juliankseb128: I can't find anything other that's skippable09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (impish-proposed/main) [1:1.90.7+git20210222+tod1-0ubuntu3 => 1:1.90.7+git20210222+tod1-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)10:00
xnoxjuliank:  OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device i see that quite often on a few amd64 adt results. Have our base images run out of space?!10:07
xnoxor is it from the worker?10:08
juliankxnox: no, the cloud worker yesterday, I fixed it overnight10:08
xnoxjuliank:  ack, will retry things like that then.10:10
sigvRAOF: got it. Thank you for the information.10:16
iceycan the upload of Neutron that's been in the unapproved queue for Focal since the first possibly be accepted into proposed?10:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.4 => 1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-desktop)10:51
locutusofborgbdmurray, hello ping to release LP: #1944744?11:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1944744 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Focal) "vboxsf missing in focal" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194474411:36
utkarsh2102bdmurray: can you also TAL at LP: #1946649, please? :)13:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946649 in azure-cli (Ubuntu) "Please remove azure-cli from Impish" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194664913:19
utkarsh2102ubuntu-archive: I've filed LP: #1946649/azure-cli for removal. If time permits, could you please TAL? Becuase this needs to be removed before we release Impish.13:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946649 in azure-cli (Ubuntu) "Please remove azure-cli from Impish" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194664913:20
bdmurrayutkarsh2102: I'm not an AA but have pinged one for you13:21
pieqHello! Has the RC of 21.10 been released yet? I can only find a link to the beta image: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/21.10/13:25
sil2100pieq: hey! Not yet!13:25
sil2100pieq: we will most possibly be spinning release candidate images somewhat later today13:25
sil2100(for the most up-to-date info!)13:26
pieqGood to know. Thanks sil2100!13:26
* apw is looking13:26
pieqIt's late here. if for any reason RC is not ready within 12 hours, do you recommend I use the latest beta, or the latest daily build?13:26
bdmurraypieq: use for what?13:27
pieqbdmurray: sorry, forgot to mention. QA on a device that was certified with 20.0413:28
xnoxpieq: even the daily does not yet have the kernel we want to ship.13:29
xnoxit has just migrated. so you do want at least a newer built than whatever is the current timestamp.13:30
pieqxnox: thanks for the info. In that case I'll get whatever is newer, tomorrow morning my time (Asia/Taipei) :)13:30
utkarsh2102bdmurray: as always, thanks a bunch! \o/13:35
paridesil2100, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/194665614:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946656 in Ubuntu CD Images "[daily impish-live-server] snapd stuck in the installer system" [Undecided, New]14:06
sil2100paride: thanks!14:23
paridedbungert, I added a subiquity task to https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1946656 as I think it affects subiquity self-refresh14:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946656 in Ubuntu CD Images "[daily impish-live-server] snapd stuck in the installer system" [Undecided, New]14:24
parideI think that really needs confirmation from a second person14:24
bdmurraysil2100: Do you know anything about the status of the uploads in the Impish queue? The only thing we have notes on is ubuntu-advantage-tools14:25
sil2100bdmurray: I only briefly looked at it this morning, not sure what's the status with thunderbird14:35
bdmurrayI think oSoMoN had pinged about that some time ago14:36
sil2100ukui-media looks like something I'd be willing to accept, since we have an ukui-media in -propsoed that FTBFS14:37
sil2100I don't know if Steve or someone reviewed it before?14:37
sil2100Thunderbird that is14:38
sil2100The gimp sync I guess I'll reject14:38
sil2100Since that's actually a bump of 4 version numbers14:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gimp [sync] (impish-proposed) [2.10.28-1]14:40
oSoMoNsil2100, thunderbird is tracked by bug #1946098, it's a bugfix release, up to you but it's fine for a 0-day SRU if you prefer14:40
ubottuBug 1946098 in thunderbird (Ubuntu) "Update to 91.2.0 in impish" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194609814:40
oSoMoNaccepting it would mean we have a fully up-to-date thunderbird in the release on day 114:41
sil2100oSoMoN: I think at this stage I'd prefer to maybe 0-day it or similar14:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-media [sync] (impish-proposed) []14:51
oSoMoNsil2100, yeah, that's reasonable14:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libunity (impish-proposed/main) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-5build1 => 7.1.4+19.04.20190319-6] (ubuntu-desktop)15:00
dbungertparide: thanks, I will investigate this morning15:02
sil2100dbungert: I pinged both the snapd and snapstore teams about this15:03
sil2100I'm starting to think it might have been a snapstore issue, maybe temporary even?15:03
dbungertsil2100: thanks for that, I still want to look and attempt to rule out Subiquity from this15:04
sil2100dbungert: ok, I think this is a snapstore issue15:10
sil2100They mentioned having to throttle the sections API endpoint15:10
sil2100So let's get back to it after a while once I get a green light from them - if we still have an issue, we can then dig deeper15:11
dbungertsil2100: sounds perfect15:11
bdmurrayIs the ubiquity task on bug 1943816 valid?15:51
ubottuBug 1943816 in OEM Priority Project "'ubuntu-drivers install' needs to be used when installing nvidia-driver if enabling 'third-party packages'" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194381615:51
bdmurrayCould an AA clear out the NBS list? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html15:56
sil2100bdmurray: on it o/15:59
bdmurrayTrevinho: is libfrpint good as an SRU?16:14
sil2100Ok, putting the freeze block in place now16:15
dbungertThe patch on LP: #1942648 looks good, I suggest merging.16:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1942648 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Impish) "restart button remains visible in the advanced partitioner after the bitlocker page is shown" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194264816:36
bdmurraydbungert: looks good or tests well? ;-)16:39
dbungertBoth :)16:39
bdmurraythat's better!16:40
dbungerthard to beat a one-liner patch16:40
juliankseb128 really needs a bouncer :/16:47
bdmurrayOkay, I'll commit the ubiquity change - thanks for testing!16:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2]17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011) has been added17:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011) has been added17:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011) has been added17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011) has been added18:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added18:02
dbungertso I'm looking into this LP: #194666818:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946668 in subiquity "subiquity no longer confirms that the requested storage config is desired" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194666818:02
sil2100dbungert: hm, the thing I mentioned that could be a snapstore issue is still creeping around, it's weir18:25
sil2100Could you maybe still allocate a few cycles today to take a look just in case?18:25
dbungertyea, I was able to reproduce it easily18:25
dbungertyes, I've captured some logs at request of #snappy18:25
sil2100Since I tried now for instance, at one moment I could run `snap list` but later on it was failing, implying as if snapd is gone?!18:26
sil2100dbungert: thanks ;)18:26
dbungertfor this bug, the steps listed are important.  If you interact with snapd right away on boot I think it's fine, but after a few steps in subiquity it isn't.18:26
sil2100Yeah, did just that, went a few steps forward, then used `snap list` and first call gave me a list (after a long wait tho), but all consecutive ones not18:27
dbungertI linked a subiquity bug above, unrelated to the snapd thing.  I think we should fix it for Impish.18:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added18:29
sil2100dbungert: hm, so you mean it instantly partitions the device?18:46
dbungertThe 'Confirm destructive action' screen is not shown.  You still go thru filesystem screens before that.18:46
sil2100I suppose that was working as expected during Beta, right?18:47
sil2100I agree, this feels like a decent release blocker18:47
dbungertgood news is I can revert one commit and address it, but it's not code I understand well.  I want mwhudson confirmation.18:49
bdmurraysil2100: rebuilding ubuntu kylin19:12
dbungertmwhudson: https://github.com/canonical/subiquity/pull/109319:13
ubottuPull 1093 in canonical/subiquity "filesystem: fix lack of confirm" [Open]19:13
sil2100bdmurray: thanks o/19:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added19:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added19:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added19:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added19:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added19:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added19:19
mwhudsondbungert: oops19:28
dbungertmwhudson: anything else pressing?19:28
mwhudsondbungert: not that i know about yet!19:29
dbungertyou might want to read LP: #1946656 but I think that's snapd, not subiquity19:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946656 in Ubuntu CD Images "[daily impish-live-server] snap stuck in the installer system" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194665619:29
mwhudsondbungert: hmm that looks pretty bad :/19:30
vorlonapw, utkarsh2102: azure-cli builds multiple binary packages, and neither of you checked the reverse-deps for the whole source package before removal; https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/impish_uninst.txt19:32
vorlonsil2100: has anyone (juliank?) looked into the cause of the arm64 backlog today?  This is not "just" fallout from the no-change rebuilds; something's wrong there, arm64 is normally much faster than this but I also haven't been able to work out where the slow-down is19:34
mwhudsondbungert: walking my daughter to school, biab19:34
vorlon(also, 160 desktop packages in -proposed != 160 packages that need to migrate, so if there are packages that specifically *need* to get in for release, those should be highlighted)19:35
juliankvorlon: I did not see increased error rates19:35
vorlonjuliank: where are you looking to see error rates?19:35
juliankvorlon: at https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/76Oe_0-Gz/autopkgtest?orgId=1&var-instance=staging19:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hexchat (focal-proposed/universe) [2.14.3-3ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2.14.3-3ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)19:36
juliankThe production one19:36
juliankarm64 active worker count did not change much19:36
juliankThe others were slow too19:37
apwvorlon, woh, how did i manage that?19:37
vorlonapw: dunno :)19:37
juliankNote that the numbers are off for large periods, we need to fix the grafana queries to aggregate correctly19:37
juliank(we report 5 min intervals, and 10 min periods sum them up, leading to values reported that are double)19:38
juliankBut I see it doing stuff, so I did not investigate further19:39
juliankWe should see significant exited abnormally, and failed workers if there are issues imo19:39
vorlonjuliank: uh, I've never seen this page before, how do I get to it from https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/ ?19:40
juliankvorlon: don't know, sorry, click somewhere to set project to autopkgtest?19:40
vorlonheh ok19:41
juliankI need to stop typing for today before my wrist fails harder :(19:41
vorlonalso, I think a thing we want to be graphing is the runtime of each autopkgtest completed during a given interval; it's difficult to synthesize an answer to the question "are autopkgtests currently running slower on the infrastructure" without that19:41
vorlonthis will obviously be noisy at high resolution because autopkgtests individually vary in runtime19:42
juliankbracket them in 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120 minute groups19:43
vorlonif all the packages jump from being in the 15 minute group to the 30 minute group because of a slow-down, that would be misleading :)19:44
juliankyoull see an increase in 30 min runs, itll be fine19:44
mwhudsondbungert: re https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1946656 it Works For Me tm20:15
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1946656 in Ubuntu CD Images "[daily impish-live-server] snap stuck in the installer system" [Undecided, New]20:15
mwhudsondbungert: i see there's been a respin since the iso paride tested though20:15
dbungertI'll download a new iso20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] has been updated (20211011.1)20:18
dbungertmwhudson: still bad for me with respun iso20:20
mwhudsondbungert: hmm20:20
bdmurrayHmm the Ubuntu Kylin didn't get the new ukui-media, building again20:21
* bdmurray tries to delete his previous message20:21
mwhudsondbungert: hmm fine for me 4 / 4 attempts, i even tried joining the vpn20:26
bdmurraymwhudson: and this is further along in the installation process?20:27
mwhudsonbdmurray: ah wait i helps if i read the bug!20:28
sil2100bdmurray: it did get it from what I see! http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/daily-live/20211011.1/impish-desktop-amd64.manifest20:28
sil2100bdmurray: it has ukui-media and is the one we were expecting I think?20:29
sil2100bdmurray: did you see something different?20:29
mwhudsonbdmurray, dbungert: ok now i see the same thing20:29
bdmurraysil2100: I did but it was because I was looking at the image from earlier in the day. ;-)20:30
sil2100...actually a similar thing happened to me today!20:31
mwhudsondbungert, bdmurray: subiquity is trying to restart snapd to pick up the proxy config and snapd is not exiting cleanly afaics20:32
dbungertmwhudson: something I haven't tested yet is if snapd 2.51.7 is happier20:33
mwhudsonwhat is going on20:36
mwhudsonhave we got a snapd developer to look at this yet?20:36
bdmurraysil2100 was talking about some rate throttling hence the 40320:37
bdmurrayit should be in the backscroll here20:38
dbungertmwhudson: there's a little chat in #snappy20:38
mwhudsonif that can make the snapd process fail to exit in response to a SIGTERM then something really funky is going on20:38
mwhudsoni should try without network i guess20:38
mwhudsonyeah i see the same without network20:41
bdmurrayHas anybody verified bug 1944468 now that glibc has migrated?20:45
ubottuBug 1944468 in glibc (Ubuntu Impish) "Electron applications all crash upon launch" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194446820:45
bdmurrayEickmeyer: ^20:46
Eickmeyerbdmurray: Yep, can confirm20:46
EickmeyerIt's migrated, no issues with electron apps anymore.20:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Impish Final] (20211011.1) has been added20:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-connections (impish-proposed/primary) [41.0-1]21:45
jbicha^ if not too much trouble, please review gnome-connections from the new queue. I'd like for people to be able to try it out easily without a PPA before the next LTS21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.103-0ubuntu5~21.04.2]22:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.2]22:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-connections [sync] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-connections [s390x] (impish-proposed/none) [41.0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-connections [amd64] (impish-proposed/none) [41.0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-connections [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/none) [41.0-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-connections [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-connections [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-connections [armhf] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-connections [amd64] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-connections [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-connections [arm64] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-connections [s390x] (impish-proposed) [41.0-1]23:26
vorlonjuliank: so you dropped metapackage-triggered autopkgtest runs; was there also coordination to skiptest these packages so they would migrate? I see base-files was skiptest'ed, but no others23:28
vorlon(and 2075 tests 'in progress' on update_excuses, but only 1161 in the queue)23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-connections [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!