[00:04] <sil2100> \o/
[00:04] <sil2100> plars_: hey! raspi images to test ^
[00:08] <sil2100> Updated release tracker
[00:08] <sil2100> See you tomorrow!
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja (impish-proposed/universe) [1.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.26.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu)
[00:25] <vorlon> Wimpy: ^^ final images are already spinning and caja is seeded on 4 flavors; is there a release-critical reason for this upload?
[00:27] <Wimpy> vorlon: Not release critical, but important for post-install updates.
[00:35] <vorlon> Wimpy: as in, post-install updates won't work right from the release version without this fix?
[00:36] <Wimpy> Not sure I understand your question?
[00:36] <vorlon> Wimpy: does it need to be in the release for future updates to work, or is it something that can go in as an SRU?
[00:36] <Wimpy> SRU
[00:36] <vorlon> ok
[00:37] <vorlon> also it looks like the bugs aren't referenced in the .changes file so that will likely need a fix-up reupload at some point
[00:38] <Wimpy> Odd, that are referenced.
[00:38] <Wimpy> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/Sx7DKvgM/
[00:53] <bdmurray> Wimpy: yeah, that's weird but they don't show up in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed https://launchpadlibrarian.net/563346925/caja_1.26.0-0ubuntu2_source.changes
[01:01] <tsimonq2> Reminds me... kc2bez will be the POC for Lubuntu for 21.04 (with myself/teward as backup), after that point I'll be jumping in to do some major Lubuntu work and you'll see me more often, perhaps as the POC again, but maybe not right away. All depends on college progress. :)
[01:02] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: 22.04 right?
[01:04] <tsimonq2> Er, wait... 21.10. I saw the topic and didn't double check. :)
[01:04] <tsimonq2> (Shows I've been out of it for a release or two...)
[01:05] <kc2bez> confirmed 21.10
[05:33] <cpaelzer> ubuntu-archive: hi, there is a last minute MIR completion for openstack (coreycb / jamespage) related package at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oslo.metrics/+bug/1943143
[05:33] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1943143 in python-prometheus-client (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-oslo.metrics, python-prometheus-client" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[05:34] <cpaelzer> can that still be promoted OR is that an issue in regard to the release that is inbound
[05:34] <cpaelzer> promotion will unblock it from excuses so https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oslo.messaging/12.9.1-0ubuntu4 would get into impish and be in main then
[05:35] <cpaelzer> The two components to be promoted are in impish already, but in universe and the above PKG is in impish/main already and held back by that component mismatch so far
[05:37] <RAOF> cpaelzer: That package is not seeded (right?), so the release shouldn't be an issue for it.
[05:41] <RAOF> cpaelzer: Have Seth's concerns re: python-oslo.metrics permissions check been resolved?L
[05:43] <cpaelzer> hi RAOF, yes it is not seeded
[05:45] <cpaelzer> The permission fix still waits to land upstream but LGTM there so far https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.metrics/+/813018
[05:46] <cpaelzer> I think if we consider it a prereq we can ask coreycb to upload an 0.3.0-0ubuntu2 asap to fulfil that
[05:47] <RAOF> ubuntu-openstack is the right team for bug subscriptions?
[05:49] <cpaelzer> it is
[05:49] <RAOF> I think we should upload 0.3.0-0ubuntu2 asap, if it's not too disruptive.
[05:49] <RAOF> That's the easiest way to ensure the fix is in before we release impish :)
[05:49] <cpaelzer> I agree, as the code is ready and easy
[05:49] <cpaelzer> so ping coreycb / jamespage to do that before promoting
[05:49] <cpaelzer> thanks RAOF for your thoughts
[05:51]  * RAOF heads to the shops.
[06:16] <enyc> hrrm alas dealing with lots of IRL-problems
[06:16] <enyc> I have Asus x201 i3-netbook intel-graphics which fails without "nomodeset", black screen desktop etc
[06:17] <enyc> on 21.04 or 21.10 kernels,   can install debian 5.10.0-9 linux image and works
[06:17] <enyc> elsewise would have hchased up and put in more bugreprots or so
[07:17] <sil2100> o/
[07:17] <sil2100> Thanks to wgrant we have a fix for the unleashed boards, so I will be accepting a new u-boot for impish
[07:18] <sil2100> This means a respin of the riscv, pi and (huh) kylin images later today!
[07:19] <sil2100> (since kylin seem to seed u-boot-tools)
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (impish-proposed/main) [2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu6 => 2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu7] (core)
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (impish-proposed) [2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu7]
[08:02] <sil2100> waveform_: heey!
[08:03] <sil2100> waveform_: I know wgrant is already looking into that, but I guess the more eyeballs the better - could you take a look on why u-boot suddenly started to FTBFS on armhf? It seemed to be fine during the archive rebuild
[08:03] <sil2100> waveform_: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu7/+build/22273004
[08:04] <jamespage> cpaelzer: +1 from me - I think the change is very low risk and we're not looking to enable this as a feature in charmed openstack this cycle anyway
[08:08] <cpaelzer> ok jamespage
[08:09] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I was mostly trying to help to drive this to a resolution asap since the II release is so soon
[08:27] <jamespage> cpaelzer: has the patch been uploaded? I can deal with that now if need be
[08:28] <cpaelzer> jamespage: no it has not been uploaded yet
[08:28] <cpaelzer> jamespage: coreycb submitted it upstream, but nothing is accepted there or in Ubuntu yet
=== jibel_ is now known as jibel
=== seb129 is now known as seb128
[08:36] <jamespage> cpaelzer: ah sorry just re-read your comment - I'm doing this right now
[08:47] <jamespage> cpaelzer: uploading now
[08:47] <jamespage> done
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oslo.metrics (impish-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[08:48] <jamespage> in the queue for the release team to review
[08:48] <jamespage> ^^
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.metrics [source] (impish-proposed) [0.3.0-0ubuntu2]
[08:55] <waveform_> sil2100, will do
=== waveform_ is now known as waveform
[08:59] <sil2100> waveform: ...actually wgrant just found the issue, it's a bizzarre little thing
[09:07] <waveform> sil2100, what was it?
[09:09] <sil2100> waveform: sooo, apparently there was a missing newline in one of the config files, and if the files were returned by 'find' (and sorted) in a specific order, this would cause one config option to be spliced incorrectly and basically missing from the target config
[09:10] <sil2100> Apparently previously on our armhf buildd builders find was returning the files in a 'lucky' order so that the faulty missing-newline file was probably always concatenated at the end? But now suddenly it wasn't!
[09:10] <waveform> sil2100, ah, missing end-newline
[09:11] <sil2100> Yes
[09:11] <sil2100> This goes into my book of 'weird failures' for sure
[09:11] <sil2100> wgrant: had to dig into that quite a lot, since it was not reproducible locally!
[09:11] <waveform> and of course find doesn't sort by default, it's just "fs-returned" order
[09:12] <sil2100> wgrant: thanks again!
[09:12]  * sil2100 waits for the upload to appear
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (impish-proposed/main) [2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu7 => 2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu8] (core)
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (impish-proposed) [2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu8]
[09:23] <wgrant> Oh sorry, was ignoring this window :)
[09:23] <wgrant> Will propose upstream, I guess. My first whitespace-only change...
[09:24] <slyon> FYI: I've uploaded FTBFS fixes for libunity and glm into impish, that could become 0-day SRUs, at the release team's discretion
[09:33] <sil2100> slyon: will look at those in a bit, thanks o/
[09:33] <sil2100> And I'll file unblock hints for u-boot
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (impish-proposed/main) [2.0.6-1ubuntu2 => 2.0.6-1ubuntu2.1] (core, kernel-dkms)
[10:40] <xnox> sil2100:  ^ is like zero-day sru candidate
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aplus-fsf (impish-proposed/universe) [4.22.1-10.1ubuntu1 => 4.22.1-10.1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aplus-fsf [source] (impish-proposed) [4.22.1-10.1ubuntu2]
[10:46] <sil2100> xnox: o/
[10:56] <ricotz> hello :)
[10:56] <ricotz> so the queue is open for zero-day SRUs already?
[11:02] <xnox> ricotz:  the queue is always there..... things uploaded to it might end up as srus, or they might end up as JJ uploads.
[11:03] <ricotz> xnox, I see, thanks
[11:41] <paride> sil2100, I submitted some test results, but added https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1840122 as a bug, to which I commented with my findings
[11:41] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1840122 in linux (Ubuntu Bionic) "System fails to reboot from live session or ubiquity-dm - squashfs_read_data failed to read block" [High, Confirmed]
[11:41] <paride> TBH I'm not 100% sure it's the same issue, part of the error is slightly different, and finalrd is installed in the live system
[11:42] <paride> so they look very similar at least
[11:47] <paride> xnox, ^^ you fixed this one ~2 years ago. Let me know if seeing it fail again rings a bell...
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (impish-proposed/main) [3.9.4-1build1 => 3.9.4-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:25] <wgrant> Verified that u-boot -0ubuntu8 is fixed on HiFive Unleashed.
[12:32] <sil2100> \o/
[12:33] <sil2100> Thanks, I see u-boot is a migration candidate, so we should be able to respin the preinstalled variants soon
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dh-python (impish-proposed/universe) [4.20201102ubuntu4 => 4.20201102ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dh-python [source] (impish-proposed) [4.20201102ubuntu5]
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-caja (impish-proposed/universe) [1.26.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.26.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate)
[13:11] <sil2100> Ok, I see u-boot migrated!
[13:13] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon: respinning raspi and riscv images o/
[13:13] <sil2100> Oh, and kylin too
[13:14] <sil2100> Might be a good time to create the source isos too
=== doko_ is now known as doko
[13:27] <doko> please can you reset the pysph/armhf autopkg test? the packages is not built on armhf anymore
[13:27] <bdmurray> doko: I can do that
[13:36] <ginggs> bdmurray: also python-nanoget/1.12.2-4 please? it has regressed in -release
[13:36] <ginggs> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-nanoget/impish/amd64
[13:39] <bdmurray> ginggs: just for amd64?
[13:40] <ginggs> bdmurray: for all please
[13:43] <bdmurray> ginggs: is there a bug about it regressing?
[13:44] <ginggs> bdmurray: not yet
[13:44] <bdmurray> can you make one if its weak sauce so I can reference it in a comment?
[13:46] <ginggs> bdmurray: sure, are you happy with a debian bug #? then i can kill 2 birds
[13:47] <bdmurray> that's fine
=== mdeslaur__ is now known as mdeslaur
[13:52] <bdmurray> dbungert: Do you have any more information on bug 1946828?
[13:52] <ubottu> Bug 1946828 in linux (Ubuntu) "ntfsresize hang and call traces in syslog" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1946828
[13:55] <dbungert> bdmurray: I can reproduce it pretty easily - is there anything else that might help?
[13:56] <bdmurray> dbungert: writing a release note as it won't get sorted
[13:56] <dbungert> oh, I was going to try some different disk configs and see if it goes away, I'll look into that
[13:56] <dbungert> sure, I can help release-note it
[13:58] <bdmurray> If you can write an initial draft in the discourse post I can review that
[13:59] <ginggs> bdmurray: debian bug #996374
[13:59] <ubottu> Debian bug 996374 in src:python-nanoget "python-nanoget: autopkgtest regression" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/996374
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[14:02] <sil2100> ^ that image rebuild was actually not necessary, but oh well!
[14:02] <sil2100> I figured that out too late
[14:04] <bdmurray> so that's a failing of seeded-in-ubuntu though?
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted augeas [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.1-2ubuntu1]
[14:09] <bdmurray> jawn-smith, waveform ^
[14:09] <waveform> bdmurray, thanks
[14:11] <bdmurray> ginggs: hinted
[14:12] <ginggs> bdmurray: thanks!
[14:13] <paride> xnox, apparently finalrd is racey with the actual teardown of the live system
[14:13] <paride> xnox, see my comment here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/1840122
[14:13] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1840122 in linux (Ubuntu Bionic) "System fails to reboot from live session or ubiquity-dm - squashfs_read_data failed to read block" [High, Confirmed]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu4]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[14:29] <xnox> paride:  nice!
[14:32] <paride> xnox :) can we somehow make finalrd stop early at shutdown?
[14:33] <paride> oh just saw your comments there
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dnsmasq [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.79-1ubuntu0.5]
[15:10] <vorlon> coreycb: octavia has not passed its MIR but is seeded as supported and is currently in mismatches, can it be unseeded for release?
[15:11] <dbungert> bdmurray: LP: #1946507 kernel logs look like the one in mine
[15:11] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1946507 in linux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Install Setup Freeze" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1946507
[15:17] <bdmurray> Oh ha, I hadn't paid enough attention
[15:18] <vorlon> xnox: can you remind me what the intent was in splitting the maas seed between "supported" and "community"?  Because the packages in 'community' are in component-mismatches with no progress, so if we aren't serious about getting these moved into main I'm not sure why they're seeded at all
[15:21] <coreycb> vorlon: yes that sounds reasonable
[15:21] <vorlon> coreycb: shall I go ahead?
[15:21] <coreycb> vorlon: yes, it's still needing a new security review I believe
[15:22] <vorlon> coreycb: done, thanks
[15:22] <coreycb> vorlon: thanks
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libunity [source] (impish-proposed) [7.1.4+19.04.20190319-6]
[15:24] <vorlon> mwhudson: component-mismatches says ubuntu-server-minimal should be demoted, cough
[15:25] <sil2100> :o
[15:26] <vorlon> ugh my browser has decided that https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html and https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html should be rendered with different fonts
[15:31] <xnox> vorlon:  it was supposed to have community things excluded from MIR reports and missmatches. And i failed to make component missmatched do that right.
[15:31] <vorlon> xnox: what was the remaining rationale for keeping it seeded at all?
[15:31] <xnox> vorlon:  the intention of seeding community is to prevent these packages getting remove from the Ubuntu Archive, because they are staged into maas snap.
[15:31] <vorlon> ah
[15:31] <xnox> or can be used by maas snap.
[15:32] <xnox> vorlon:  why i can't run components-missmatches with exclude maas-community is a mystery to me.
[15:32] <xnox> ditto why running germinate against a rebuild archive produces widely different results form the main archive (i.e. lots of things missing from ubuntu-desktop seed for an otherwise matching archive)
[15:38] <sil2100> dbungert: LP: #1946668 were you able to check if this is fixed now with the latest images?
[15:38] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1946668 in subiquity "subiquity no longer confirms that the requested storage config is desired" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1946668
[15:38] <dbungert> sil2100: yes, fixed!
[15:43] <jamespage> hi release team - I've made a minor snafu and missed the OVN 21.09.0 release announce at the start of the month
[15:44] <jamespage> we've been running snapshots and one of the outstanding issues we have during testing is resolved by a commit between the last snapshot and release
[15:44] <jamespage> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/1947003
[15:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1947003 in ovn (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU?] ovn 21.09.0" [High, Triaged]
[15:44] <jamespage> I've documented inthe bug report and I'm currently building packages to validate
[15:45] <jamespage> diff if small (295L) and risk looks fairly low so looking for guidance on whether to upload for release team review or hold until post release and SRU with the normal regression testing that we do
[15:54] <sil2100> jamespage: hey! I think we'd like the archive to settle now, but we could potentially take it as a 0-day SRU
[15:55] <jamespage> sil2100: yeah that was my guess
[15:55] <sil2100> Let me add it to the list
[15:56] <jamespage> great yhxs
[15:56] <jamespage> thx rather!
[16:07] <dbungert> bdmurray: is there some sort of deadline on release notes?  I want to understand the issue better first so we don't end up with a release note that is basically "installer might hang lol"
[16:08] <bdmurray> dbungert: well before release is the deadline but today would be better
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Impish Final] has been updated (20211013)
[16:33] <jawn-smith> hooray new pi images
[16:43] <sil2100> \o/
[16:52] <blackboxsw> Hello SRU vanguards: I think we've reached rbasak's end of day for SRU review of ubuntu-advantage-tools. Is there any chance that we can get an SRU reviewer to look at the uploads for ubuntu-advantage-tools in X, B, F and H per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1942929.
[16:52] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1942929 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.2.2 -> 27.3) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute" [Undecided, In Progress]
[16:57] <blackboxsw> Given that 0-day SRU is pending an accepted release, we would like to start the verification on X B F and H for this content. Azure is very interested in the IMDS API version bump that is included in this release.
[17:09] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon: looking at the isotracker, I guess I'll prepublish the images - server got a basically no-change rebuild and previously it was green
[17:09] <sil2100> And pre-publishing doesn't have much impact really
[17:17] <vorlon> sil2100: ack
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (focal-proposed/main) [1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:6.4.7+mimo3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:02] <sil2100> Ok, prepublished
[18:26] <bdmurray> apw: will more information be added to the "Linux kernel" section of the release notes or should "tbc." be dropped?
[18:54] <dbungert> bdmurray: I don't seem to have release note edit permissions.  Can you merge this?  https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dbungert/7bd9764874b24d0f3183cf7b98021de0/raw/8c5610f1a23e2412ce5052cda4a8b7769e06f086/relnotes.md
[18:59] <bdmurray> dbungert: added, thanks!
[19:02] <dbungert> bdmurray: thanks, but can you tweak it?  Looks like a closing bracket got lost.
[19:05] <bdmurray> dbungert: sorted
[20:20] <mwhudson> vorlon: oh oops i guess i never added it to the seed
[20:21] <mwhudson> vorlon: will the archive get published again before release?
[20:22] <mwhudson> oh i see you fixed it
[20:35] <vorlon> mwhudson: yeah :)
[20:36] <vorlon> c-m now properly cleaned up, only the community-maas stuff and the i386 nonsense left
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-media [source] (impish-proposed) [1.26.0-0ubuntu2]
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-notification-daemon [source] (impish-proposed) [1.26.0-0ubuntu2]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-menus [source] (impish-proposed) [1.26.0-0ubuntu2]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caja [source] (impish-proposed) [1.26.0-0ubuntu2]
[20:55] <sergiodj> sil2100: bdmurray: hi guys, u-a-t is waiting on the SRU queue for X/B/F/H (there's also a 0-day SRU for Impish which has been pre-approved by vorlon, but I think that one will be dealt with in the following days).  I would like to kindly ask if you could take a look at these packages tomorrow when your day starts, so that we can have these updates finally done.  let me know if you need more
[20:55] <sergiodj> details; blackboxsw or I will be happy to provide more info.  TIA
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dkms [sync] (impish-proposed) [2.8.7-1]
[20:57] <bdmurray> sergiodj: when my day starts tomorrow I'll be working on finalizing impish
[20:58] <bdmurray> sergiodj: did you say there was some important bug being fixed though?
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Impish Final] has been marked as ready