[01:02] <teward> bah yes sorry rbasak
[01:02] <teward> multitasking
[01:02] <teward> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948699  <-- missing 9
[01:03] <teward> rbasak: cpaelzer: if one of you want to handle it or eval their request, they want it in arm64 on 18.04 (which is... pretty old at this point)
[05:30] <cpaelzer> teward: I have seen and tagged the bug, thanks. But I do not foresee to have time for it soon
[10:45] <rbasak> vorlon: could you take a look at bug 1916250 for me please? I'm not sure it's right, but nor am I sure it's wrong.
[12:05] <tsimonq2> schopin: Congratulations on MOTU!
[12:05] <schopin> thank you very much :)
[12:06] <RikMills> schopin: welcome to MOTU. congrats :)
[12:07]  * tsimonq2 throws RikMills a core-dev application
[12:10] <RikMills> gulp
[12:10] <schopin> :D
[12:11] <schopin> Well, MOTU sounds more impressive than Core Dev, I get why you'd want to stick with it ;)
[12:17] <tsimonq2> I mean, you're still a MOTU when you're a Core Dev :)
[12:22] <fheimes> congrats @schopin !
[12:22] <schopin> thank you :)
[13:02] <oSoMoN> schopin, congrats on becoming a MOTU
[13:29] <vorlon> rbasak: gir1.2-signon-2.0 exists in hirsute and later; gir1.2-signon-1.0 exists in focal; we support upgrades from the LTS to either the next LTS, or to the next supported non-LTS release.  So there are upgrade paths to hirsute now, and to impish once hirsute EOLs, so yes it's correct to SRU this fix
[13:42] <jawn-smith> Is any core dev available to review an SRU on LP: #1913656 ? Maybe till-kamppeter?
[16:00] <rbasak> vorlon: I agree it needs SRUing. My question is if a sole unversioned Replaces is correct.
[16:00] <vorlon> rbasak: ah, that should be fine