[14:05] <xnox> fling:  there is linux-oem 5.14
[14:06] <xnox> fling:  dpaste expired?
[15:01] <fling> xnox: what is linux-oem?
[15:01] <fling> I found the working patch elsewhere
[15:01] <fling> the one for 5.14.something but it works for 5.14.14
[15:21] <xnox> fling:  one of the dozen of kernel flavours we maintain
[15:22] <xnox> for which there is focal repo, and v5.14 based kernel.
[15:24] <fling> xnox: focal is at 5.14.3 right?
[15:25] <fling> the patch is not building, erroring out
[15:26] <juergh> fling, which focal kernel?
[15:29] <fling> juergh: the 5.14.3 one
[15:35] <juergh> fling, that doesn't tell me what it is. what's the source name? linux-oem-5.14? where did you pull the source from?
[15:43] <juergh> fling, focal linux-oem-5.14 is 5.14.14. https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem/+git/focal
[15:43] <fling> idk what linux-oem-5.14 is
[15:44] <fling> ok, maybe I will try linux-oem later
[15:44] <fling> juergh: thanks :>
[15:44] <fling> idk how I missed it
[15:45] <juergh> it's an oem kernel so don't expect much support...
[16:06] <xnox> fling:  it's 5.14.0 + lots of ubuntu patches + lots of vendor specific / hw specific patches that may break stock systems + stable updates to 5.14.14 => but overall it should have shiftfs stuff extractable / ported to something that looks like v5.14.14
[16:07] <xnox> meaning if something is not working with shiftfs it is either fixed in that tree, or we have a regression which we would gladly take a bug report about
[16:22] <TJ-> is there still need for shiftfs now idmap is integrated since v5.12 ?
[16:27] <fling> TJ-: still needed until lxd implements the support
[16:28] <fling> xnox: ok :>
[16:32] <xnox> TJ-:  i think one needs both to use all the things lxd wants to do
[16:32] <xnox> i.e. nested container bind mount points