[02:24] <mwhudson> vorlon: found the hdf5 problem
[02:24] <mwhudson>     /* remove trailing ';' from signed headers sequence */
[02:24] <mwhudson>     signed_headers_dest[HDstrlen(signed_headers_dest) - 1] = '\0';
[02:24] <mwhudson> vorlon: it would be Bad(tm) if signed_headers_dest is the empty string here, perhaps
[02:27] <mwhudson> doko, ginggs: do you have a plan for python 3.10 vs autoconf-archive?
[03:48] <mwhudson> icey: does your team take care of wrapt in ubuntu? i have a patch anyway https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/jb9D6JzTmg/
[03:48] <mwhudson> icey: i can upload that tomorrow if you like
[06:18] <ginggs> mwhudson: no plan, as such
[06:18] <ginggs> are you going to upload hdf5?
[06:57] <icey> mwhudson: I don't think so, although I do see that zigo is the uploader in Debian; I'm sad that the upstream patch has a typo though :-P
[07:56] <ginggs> mwhudson: new plan for autoconf-archive -- steal patch from fedora
[09:39] <mwhudson> ginggs: i'll upload hdf5 tomorrow unless you want to do it sooner
[09:39] <mwhudson> icey: ack, there is a new upstream version too but well
[09:39] <mwhudson> one thing at a time i guess
[09:40] <ginggs> mwhudson: do you have it in a PPA?  i could "sponsor" your upload
[09:41] <ginggs> automake-1.16 and autoconf-archive uploaded
[09:41] <mwhudson> ginggs: it's here https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+packages?field.name_filter=hdf5&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter= but you might need to rewrite the changelog and call the patch something other than "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.patch" ;-p
[09:41] <mwhudson> ginggs: ah yeah pythonmagick should build with the new automake, i think
[09:41] <ginggs> mwhudson: it does, at least locally for me
[09:42]  * mwhudson zzzz
[10:03] <icey> is ` format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]` a new error on jammy? I'm seeing that working on ensuring Ceph works with OpenSSL 3 ( but want to confirm working build before that even)
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> icey, might be a gcc-11 change
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> icey, if you only care about openssl 3 changes, better use gcc-10
[10:21] <icey> LocutusOfBorg: well, it'll need to build on Jammy at some point anyway :-P
[10:40] <icey> LocutusOfBorg: is there some magic incantation to use sbuild with Jammy and a specific gcc? or should I just grab an impish chroot?
[11:18] <pi3> Guys, I debianized acme-client of OpenBSD OS: https://github.com/baytuch/acme-client
[12:18] <LocutusOfBorg> icey, I add gcc-10/g++-10 to control file and export CC=gcc-10 export CXX=g++-10 in rules
[12:19] <icey> LocutusOfBorg: thanks, that's what I'm trying now so glad it sounds reasonable :-P
[12:20] <LocutusOfBorg> but yes, fixing gcc-11 build failures is also needed
[15:41] <slyon> ddstreet: hey! May I get your comment on https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/411528 ? I'm afraid we need to find a different fix for LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934147 as the current patches regressed in UC18
[19:21] <vorlon> lto1: fatal error: bytecode stream in file '.libs/swigutil_rb.o' generated with LTO version 9.4 instead of the expected 11.2
[19:22] <vorlon> lovely
[19:23] <vorlon> mwhudson: ^^ is that the swig/ruby thing you were mentioning? (subversion/)
[20:27] <mwhudson> vorlon: yes
[23:19] <vorlon> mwhudson: does https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/supertuxkart/1.3+dfsg1-2/+build/22310620 look like it needs a non-default -march incantation, or is this using an instruction it shouldn't be using on armhf?