[00:49] <guiverc> Bashing-om, I propose we change "arighi" to "Andrea Righi" in "YannickOnAir interviews"   (sorry I'm disappointed I didn't propose it my-saturday)
[00:50] <Bashing-om> guiverc: looking :D
[00:51] <guiverc> (the hub)
[00:52] <guiverc> There is no ")" in the Feedback-polooze... I'd suggest removing madhens too & just have Monica's nme
[00:52] <guiverc> s/nme/name
[00:52]  * guiverc ignoring my other typo(s)
[00:53]  * guiverc I've not edited the gdoc.. i can if helpful
[00:53] <Bashing-om> guiverc: As we have original "Tonight I had the pleasure to interview @arighi on ..." what we can do is add the full name in parens.
[00:54] <guiverc> we don't have any quotes; so we're not quoting as I read it
[00:55] <guiverc> s/arighi/'arighi'/ maybe an alternative.. reads like a typo I fear without an "@"
[00:55] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Yeah not a dirct quote - I still feel the more comforable to add the name within.
[00:56] <guiverc> do as you deem fit Bashing-om 
[00:56] <guiverc> I'd remove "madhens("; iso it starts with capital & no hanging "("
[00:57] <Bashing-om> guiverc: By no means do I claim to be a sharp tack , but do want it gramattically/usage correct.
[00:57] <guiverc> Release of cloud-init... Should the "extensive Changelog" be capital C?  I suspect not.
[01:00] <guiverc> Blogo:  "Canonical Begins Offer..".. "in cooperation from Intel" - should that be "with Intel" ??  (maybe just how I speak/mispeak?)
[01:02] <guiverc> s/TUXEDO COmput/TUXEDO Comput" 
[01:02] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Not real sure how to handle capitalization for a proper name that the owner (madhens in this case) chooses the name as lower case even though the name starts the sentence. I do think in thinking about it that the start of the sentence rules that madhens should then be a capital M,
[01:03] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Aha - thought that TUXEDO COmput was on purpose !
[01:03] <guiverc> My preference is real names & dropping pseduonames... but if stuck - flip a coin ??  :)
[01:03] <guiverc> sorry; nah just my bad typing most probably
[01:05] <guiverc> something is wrong with me & typing on this box... six keyboards, even now swapped out the cable & it's still missing characters (though too-long hold on shift will just be & miss catching it in read-back.. reading what I'd intended not what I typed)
[01:05] <Bashing-om> guiverc: "in cooperation from Intel" --- I too had your thought --- but the author used "from" and I follwed that.
[01:06] <guiverc> We're not quoting, so I see no reason why we can't change (correct?) but whatever you wish
[01:13]  * guiverc on phone call & stopped reading for now
[01:13] <Bashing-om> guiverc: I take your take on from and changed to "with" :D
[01:15] <Bashing-om> guiverc: caught up - I believe - with current edit recommends.
[01:15] <guiverc> :)   I'd stopped reading dealing with phone & real-life awhile before I typed..  back to reading
[01:17] <guiverc> finished my read thru.. looked good Bashing-om , and didn't see any issues   (have a feeling I didn't see something I usually do, but unsure what)
[01:21] <guiverc> I'd add (as you suggested) "(Andrea Righi)" after @arighi - it now matches how you did it with Monica's article.. and I feel better than just @arighi
[01:23] <guiverc> I'm not very familiar with arighi & I suspect other readers will be somewhat like me.. Andrea has been in a few recent vids, but anyone who doesn't follow kernel updates may not recognize the name is my reasoning
[01:28] <Bashing-om> guiverc: agreed (Andrea Righi) - making it so :D
[01:31] <Bashing-om> guiverc: As nether you nor kryten sees my format concern - I am not going to worry further about it at this time.
[01:33] <guiverc> formatting is usually detected more by krytarik not me..   unless it's flashing strobe-like I can easily miss..   but you mentioned it & thus i looked for issue, but didn't see it (I do try & read like a 'reader' or what I assume is a reader of UWN in proof-read)
[01:35] <guiverc> nah I don't see it.
[01:35] <Bashing-om> guiverc: I spent some time attempting to separate "Further attention in the media:" items in the listings - I have failed to make the distinctions :(
[01:37] <guiverc> My only reaction to that wording was "That's new - haven't see that wording before (I think)" but that was it.
[16:03] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Ubuntu Blog: History of Open Source Identity Management (part 1) @ https://ubuntu.com//blog/history-of-open-source-identity-management-part-1
[19:59] <Bashing-om> UWN: Pulling "WIP" log checked and no futher edits are known. Time to push 21:00 UTC .
[20:59] <Bashing-om> UWN: ubuntu-news@lists is away - Doing the Forum post next :D
[21:02] <guiverc> ack.   once my system has upgraded packages, and I finished this (support) reply & have a drink in my my mug.. I'll join
[21:11] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Good deal - there is also a new kernel for focal out :D
[21:14] <Bashing-om> UWN: Forum post completed - abridgements in the usual palces - doing the Re-directs next.
[21:14] <guiverc> I'm okay to push to fridge Bashing-om  (UWN 708)?   ; once I find my mousepad window; must be open in another virt-workspace
[21:16] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Yup - push to the Fridge and friends - when you can :D
[21:17] <guiverc> https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/11/08/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-708/
[21:18] <guiverc> pushed to telegram & twitter
[21:24] <guiverc> posted to fb too
[21:26] <Bashing-om> Fridge: Spot check checks good :D
[21:26] <guiverc> thanks Bashing-om 
[21:26] <Bashing-om> guiverc: Clear now to wipe Gdoc ? evidence no longed required ?
[21:27] <guiverc> yep wipe away 
[21:33] <Bashing-om> UWN: We do issue709 - :D
[21:43] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: The Fridge: Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter Issue 708 @ https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/11/08/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-708/