[00:11] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: could someone please remove the armhf binaries for eckit, fckit, metkit
[00:11] <mwhudson> (does this need a bug?)
[00:14] <RAOF> Not necessarily.
[00:15] <mwhudson> hm is this on?
[00:15] <RAOF> It looks like you're asking for that because those source packages no longer build armhf binaries?
[00:15] <mwhudson> RAOF: ah hi :)
[00:15] <mwhudson> RAOF: yes
[00:15] <mwhudson> the binaries have been removed in debian
[00:15] <mwhudson> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=both;dist=unstable;include=subject%3Aeckit;package=ftp.debian.org
[00:17] <mwhudson> hm probably want the other two packages there to be removed too
[00:17] <RAOF> Huh. The metkit in jammy-proposed still seems to build armhf binaries?
[00:18] <mwhudson> hmm
[00:20] <mwhudson> hmm https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993624 says that metkit was fixed but it doesn't look like that happened
[00:34] <mwhudson> RAOF: anyway, even if the next upload of metkit doesn't update the architectures, if the binaries for the dependencies have been removed, the armhf builds will just depwait and cause no migration issues?
[00:34] <mwhudson> or i can do a quick metkit upload with that change
[00:34] <mwhudson> RAOF: would be nice to get this dealt with thouth
[00:35] <RAOF> Yeah, I'm just checking that there's no other rdepends.
[00:35] <mwhudson> thx
[00:35] <RAOF> Yeah, metkit will just depwait on armhf and everything will be unicorns.
[00:40] <bryyce> utkarsh2102, to spare everyone here a wall of text, I've dropped the notes here:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/kSmWDwDvh9/
[00:41] <bryyce> utkarsh2102, I've also updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Transition/Php8.1 with summarized info
[00:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mariadb-10.6 [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1:10.6.4-1] (no packageset)
[00:54] <RAOF> Looks like we also need magics++.
[00:56] <bryyce> @utkarsh2102 @vorlon php-codecoverage 9.2.8 now builds successfully for me locally, I'm trying a simple LP rebuild but it may need a no-change rebuild uploaded
[01:01] <bryyce> @utkarsh no dice on simple LP rebuild, uploading no-change rebuild.  Please check on status when you BOD.
[01:16] <RAOF> mwhudson: Ok, I *think* all the relevant armhf packages are cleaned up now. A bunch (odc, fdb, metview, magic++, atlas-ecmwf) already weren't built for armhf, leaving just eckit, fckit and metkit.
[01:16] <mwhudson> RAOF: woo thanks
[02:58] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: can ruby3.0 be added to the i386-whitelist pls
[04:20] <ginggs> xnox: i see that in the r-bioc-affy autopkgtest.  i tried again now with r-bioc-biocgenerics/0.38.0-1 from -proposed and it passed.
[04:21] <ginggs> also, the tests that were failing with 'Fortran complex functions are not available on this platform' also passed
[04:22] <ginggs> so i think your upload was good and no rebuilds needed
[04:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mariadb-10.6 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1:10.6.4-1] (no packageset)
[05:04] <vorlon> mwhudson: done
[05:04] <vorlon> mwhudson: (and building)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libanyevent-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libasync-interrupt-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libcanary-stability-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libcommon-sense-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libev-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libevent-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libfilter-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libfreenect from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libfuture-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libio-async-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libio-pipely-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libmetrics-any-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libpoe-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libstruct-dumb-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libtest-metrics-any-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libunicode-utf8-perl from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed perl-tk from i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added platformdirs to i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pybind11 to i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ruby3.0 to i386-whitelist in jammy
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: obs-advanced-scene-switcher [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.15.3+git20210913.25cf51a-2] (no packageset)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: obs-advanced-scene-switcher [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.15.3+git20210913.25cf51a-2] (no packageset)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: obs-advanced-scene-switcher [arm64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.15.3+git20210913.25cf51a-2] (no packageset)
[07:12] <mwhudson> vorlon: thanks
[09:11] <ginggs> xnox: btw, the R tests with complex functions all passed with r-base built with LTO in my PPA, both with all-proposed and without
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (focal-proposed/main) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.3 => 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.4] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[12:23] <xnox> ginggs:  nice!
[12:51] <ginggs> and it looks like r-base is migrating now \o/
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: openjdk-17 (xenial-proposed/primary) [17~11-1~16.04~2]
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-17 (bionic-proposed/universe) [17+35-1~18.04 => 17.0.1+12-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-17 (focal-proposed/universe) [17+35-1~20.04 => 17.0.1+12-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-17 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [17+35-1~21.04 => 17.0.1+12-1~21.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-17 (impish-proposed/universe) [17+35-1 => 17.0.1+12-1~21.10] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (focal-backports/main) [1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:7.1.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:41] <doko> amurray, libseccomp ftbfs, bogus check in debian/rules: python3 -c "pyver='$$pyver'; exit(0 if float(pyver[6:]) >= 3.8 else 1)"
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected openjdk-17 [sync] (xenial-proposed) [17~11-1~16.04~2]
[14:59] <tjaalton> rbasak: hi, I've added some more info on the focal mesa sru bug, hope it's enough
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.4]
[15:14] <rbasak> tjaalton: accepted. Though I don't think you're really answering the "Where things could go wrong" section, it's not worth arguing about.
[15:21] <tjaalton> for trivial things like this a simple "nowhere" should suffice, but I feel that wouldn't help getting it accepted :)
[15:21] <tjaalton> and thanks
[15:30] <rbasak> tjaalton: well, that's explicitly not acceptable by our current policy. I can still think of things that can go wrong. For example, were the right pointers NULLed? Are there any others anywhere that were missed? Is something somewhere relying on it being not NULL?
[15:30] <rbasak> Proving to me that these aren't the case isn't the point. Identifying the area of code/testing that could identify a mistake here is the point.
[15:31] <rbasak> Is the pointer definitely valid at the point it's being set to NULL? Is the member still valid at the point that some code is now relying on it being NULL?
[17:14] <ginggs> there goes r-bioc-*
[18:00] <blackboxsw> rbasak: maybe it's too late in the day for SRU review. if you get a chance to review the software-properties upload for bionic @ http://launchpadlibrarian.net/567282951/software-properties_0.96.24.32.17_0.96.24.32.18.diff.gz it's been hanging out in the unapproved queue for a while. If not, no rush, I'll ping SRU vanguard tomorrow
[18:01] <blackboxsw> this same changeset has undergone my verification on Focal, Hirsute, Impish and Jammy
[18:01] <blackboxsw> just needed to sync functionality for desktop into Bionic
[18:03] <blackboxsw> per bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1939732
[18:08] <blackboxsw> ultimately for this review we want to replace the current software-properties_0.96.24.32.17 in bionic-proposed with 0.96.24.32.18   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1920836/comments/40
[18:18] <bdmurray> blackboxsw, rbasak: I can have a look at this
[18:18] <blackboxsw> thanks Brian
[18:20] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: the phrase "please reject 0.96.24.32.17" is confusing. The choices are supersede the existing upload and include the fix for bug 1934439 or supsede and drop the fix for that bug.
[18:21] <bdmurray> well given that the pro banner patch passed verification lets choose include the fix for that
[18:23] <blackboxsw> ahhh right makes sense, didn't realize that the bionic upload also dropped the bug fix. I thought it was put up as supplemental
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.96.24.32.18]
[19:15] <ricotz> bdmurray, hello :), could you take a look at this libreoffice backport proposal? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1950467
[19:16] <bdmurray> ricotz: Is that different than the existing one?
[19:17] <ricotz> bdmurray, this targets focal-backports
[19:17] <bdmurray> ricotz: Oh, I'm not on the backports team
[19:18] <ricotz> bdmurray, oh, I assumed so :), do I have to assign the bug to another team besides ubuntu-release?
[19:25] <bdmurray> ricotz: I'm not sure what the backports team new process is. ddstreet might be able to help
[19:30] <ricotz> bdmurray, I see, thank you
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit-machines [source] (focal-backports) [255-1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit-machines [source] (impish-backports) [255-1~ubuntu21.10.1]
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mediawiki-extension-codemirror [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [4.0.0~git20210902.a63f3c2-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-mdn-browser-compat-data [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [4.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-statsd-parser [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-strftime [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clpeak [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-fn.name [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.1.0-4] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-triple-beam [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-fecha [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [4.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-text-hex [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clpeak [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: harmonypy [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.0.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [41.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zycore-c [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcm [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [202110-1] (no packageset)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clpeak [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zycore-c [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zycore-c [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clpeak [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clpeak [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clpeak [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [41.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mrgingham [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.20-1] (no packageset)