[04:24] <lotuspsychje> good morning
[10:33] <lotuspsychje> https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/18/firefox_cookies_github/
[10:34] <oerheks> oh tons of crawlers that show logins/passwords/certificates in github, hilarious to read, after the daily cartoons
[10:34] <lotuspsychje> the best exploits are old unfixed ones :p
[10:36] <TJ-> most of the problem is allowing people to think, and treat, computer systems as if they're as simple as them!
[10:36] <lotuspsychje> yeah
[12:52] <MiraCat> Would low latency kernel fit everything for doing audio video work? Because I'm getting a bit OCD about if using the low latency kernel isn't good enough for all A/V work and might have to configure the kernel further.
[12:53] <lotuspsychje> MiraCat: can you elaborate a bit more of what specific you suspect the low latency kernel would not support for your machine(s)?
[12:55] <TJ-> MiraCat: I've been using PREEMPT kernels for over 10 years without problems regarding latency 
[12:55] <TJ-> MiraCat: tools that rely on low-latency seem to like it
[12:57] <Fatal_Sushi> TJ-: isn't preempt build in by default these days?
[12:58] <TJ-> No, that's that the -lowlatecny- kernels are; -generic is cooperative multi-tasking
[12:58] <Fatal_Sushi> ah i see
[12:59] <TJ-> I've neverquite understood why the desktop has -generic- since -lowlatency- is much better for deteministic desktop usage where even a few millseconds of lag are noticed
[13:01] <MiraCat> Honestly. All this kernel configuration is giving me a headache. I might just use windows if I'm doing demanding audio-video work and ubuntu for general purpose stuff.
[13:28] <TJ-> MiraCat: that's not going to gain you anything; Windows kernel cannot do true realtime with guaranteed latency
[16:32] <lotuspsychje_> https://ubuntuhandbook.org/index.php/2021/11/kgx-terminal-core-gnome-phosh/
[16:44] <daftykins> can't see what problem it solves
[16:45] <lotuspsychje_> yet another terminal