[09:58] <paride> mwhudson, hi! do you think we should upload a new probert to the archive?
[09:58] <paride> mwhudson, I know subiquity isn't using the .deb package, but since we have it packaged it's a pity to leave it behind
[09:59] <GunnarHj> Hi tsimonq2!
[09:59] <GunnarHj> Why does Lubuntu install fcitx by default? If there is no particular reason, it would be much better to drop fcitx from the seed. Please see this old Discourse thread for my reasoning:
[09:59] <GunnarHj> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/default-im-config-configuration/17136
[09:59] <GunnarHj> And also the ongoing discussion at https://bugs.debian.org/976603
[10:30] <tsimonq2> I will look into it, thank you!
[10:43] <GunnarHj> Thanks tsimonq2. Please let me know what you find.
[13:45] <cpaelzer> ginggs: I've found rss-glx to be involved in the transition of glew
[13:45] <cpaelzer> ginggs: you have uploaded a no change rebiuld on Oct 26th
[13:45] <cpaelzer> ginggs: that one FTBFSes - I wanted to have a look but check with you if you have already done some work on this to avoid duplicate efforts
[13:49] <cpaelzer> There was an NMU fixing this and also a glew things in Debian, need to rebase
[13:49] <cpaelzer> I'll do that, please stop me ginggs if you had other plans for this
[14:17] <ginggs> cpaelzer: please go ahead with rss-glx, i have not investigated it
[14:21] <cpaelzer> already uploaded by now :-)
[15:35] <dbungert> Retest click please? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=jammy&arch=amd64&package=numpy&trigger=python3-defaults/3.9.7-4&trigger=numpy/1%3A1.21.4-2
[15:42] <ginggs> dbungert: .
[15:45] <dbungert> ginggs: thanks
[16:36] <dbungert> ginggs: that passed, would you do a few more? https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/yq9S8RGMFn/
[16:37] <ginggs> dbungert: sure
[17:44] <jawn-smith> Is any core-dev around to take a look at bug 1951988 ? It's a tiny change that I think would be a great QOL improvement for new hires at Canonical and the core-devs who sponsor their work
[17:47] <jawn-smith> made the title more better: bug 1951988
[17:53] <dbungert> jawn-smith: great idea
[18:30] <jawn-smith> dbungert: thanks!
[21:23] <mwhudson> paride: hmm i guess or maybe just RM it?