| KGB-0 | libcanberra Heather Ellsworth 285497 * commented merge request !4 * https://deb.li/9nKM | 05:06 |
|---|---|---|
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 06:42 |
| duflu | Hi oSoMoN | 07:20 |
| jpnurmi | hey duflu oSoMoN | 07:24 |
| duflu | Hi jpnurmi | 07:25 |
| oSoMoN | hey duflu & jpnurmi | 07:28 |
| didrocks | good morning | 07:39 |
| jpnurmi | hey didrocks | 07:40 |
| didrocks | hey jpnurmi | 07:44 |
| jibel | good morning all | 08:32 |
| pieq | hello everyone! | 08:34 |
| oSoMoN | salut didrocks, jibel, pieq | 08:48 |
| didrocks | salut oSoMoN, pieq | 08:48 |
| jibel | Salut oSoMoN | 08:49 |
| seb128 | goood morning desktopers | 08:51 |
| oSoMoN | salut seb128 | 08:51 |
| seb128 | lut oSoMoN, en forme ? | 08:52 |
| oSoMoN | la nuit a été courte, mais ça va, et toi? | 08:53 |
| seb128 | un peu pareil, réveillé à 1h pour un biberon et à 6h pour un pb de pile dans la veilleuse :-/ | 08:56 |
| oSoMoN | :/ | 09:03 |
| didrocks | salut seb128 | 09:04 |
| seb128 | lut didrocks, en forme ? | 09:04 |
| didrocks | ça va, merci :) Nuit tranquille ici | 09:05 |
| seb128 | veinard :-) | 09:05 |
| didrocks | ouais, mais bon, pas de nounou encore pour cause covid, chacun sa croix :p | 09:05 |
| jibel | salut seb128 oSoMoN | 09:12 |
| seb128 | lut jibel, en forme ? ;-) | 09:14 |
| jibel | oui, tout va très bien :) | 09:15 |
| seb128 | didrocks, on a le droit à ça aussi là, crèche fermée encore pour la semaine à cause de cas chez les employés :-/ | 09:15 |
| schopin | Hi desktopers! Back for ppp again (under your umbrella as a NM dependency, I believe). It depends on OpenSSL, and it has basically no build-time testing nor any autopkgtest. I don't suppose you know of a test protocol somewhere that I could manually run? | 09:18 |
| didrocks | seb128: on verra si ce n’est que le début ou si ça s’améliore avec le temps… | 09:19 |
| duflu | Morning didrocks, jibel, seb128 | 09:26 |
| jibel | Good morning duflu | 09:28 |
| KGB-0 | libcanberra Gunnar Hjalmarsson 285523 * commented merge request !5 * https://deb.li/3JvGj | 09:36 |
| didrocks | hey duflu | 09:41 |
| seb128 | didrocks, oui :-/ | 10:16 |
| seb128 | schopin, sorry, I don't think we have anyone who knows or maintain it, we basically inherit from Debian and do merges, I'm not even sure we have anyone with hardware for testing it | 10:17 |
| KGB-0 | libcanberra Olivier Tilloy 285532 * commented merge request !5 * https://deb.li/3CbPF | 10:19 |
| schopin | seb128: fwiw most uses of ppp don't necessitate any specific hardware. But yes, I can see how this package would be a bit outside your wheelhouse :) | 10:20 |
| seb128 | schopin, if it's blocking the transition I would just upload what you think is right, we will get reports if it's buggy and it's still early in the cycle. | 10:21 |
| schopin | A simple no-change upload would be nice. I tested the build locally this morning and it went fine. | 10:22 |
| seb128 | schopin, and see, my comment shows how little I know about what ppp is doing exactly, I though it was essentially dealing with modems | 10:22 |
| seb128 | schopin, feel free to upload one, or do you want us to do that? | 10:23 |
| schopin | I'll lump it in my list of main packages to upload and bother someone on my team then, it'll be easier. | 10:23 |
| seb128 | thanks | 10:23 |
| KGB-0 | libcanberra ubuntu/master b306695 Heather Ellsworth debian/ (6 files in 2 dirs) * Merge branch 'debian/master' into ubuntu/master * https://deb.li/36Bmd | 10:25 |
| KGB-0 | libcanberra tags b306695 Olivier Tilloy ubuntu/0.30-8ubuntu1 * https://deb.li/OrD4 | 10:25 |
| schopin | Me again! Any plans on updating freerdp2 from 2.3.0 to 2.4.1 this cycle? That last one brings OpenSSL 3 support. Alternatively, I have a patch ready (LP: #1945771) | 13:06 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1945771 in freerdp2 (Ubuntu) "freerdp2: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1945771 | 13:06 |
| seb128 | schopin, we will not be surprised at this point if I tell you again that we usually get that one from Debian and have no real dedicated maintainer which an answer for you? ;-) | 13:51 |
| seb128 | schopin, I would like to see it updated though, the update has some CVE fixes and performance improvements that would be nice to get for the LTS. I see Debian reports about the CVE but no reply from the maintainer so far | 13:52 |
| seb128 | schopin, whether you want to upload the patch or wait probably depends on how much of how close you are to finish the openssl transition | 13:54 |
| schopin | TBH I'd rather update to a newer upstream than carry a patch, that makes it easier to detect issues down the line. | 13:55 |
| seb128 | schopin, when do you need the update done? I can work on that, but that seems more likely a monday thing than before eow at this point | 13:55 |
| schopin | I'm in a marathon, not a sprint. THis package might block a few others down the line (I think?) but it's not the only one by far. | 13:57 |
| schopin | Monday sounds fine to me :) | 13:58 |
| seb128 | k, I will work on the update | 14:01 |
| schopin | Thanks a lot! | 14:02 |
| GunnarHj | seb128, schopin: I just sponsored it. Isn't it preferable to get the transition done ASAP? | 14:03 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, shrug :-( | 14:05 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Saw your discussion only afterwards.. :/ | 14:06 |
| seb128 | ah ok, already then | 14:06 |
| seb128 | alright | 14:06 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, from what I understand from the backlog that transition isn't going to be over this week in any case, so waiting a few days to do the update isn't going to delay anything | 14:07 |
| schopin | GunnarHj: short term, yes (notably for my own sanity). But from a security standpoint I'd rather carry as few OpenSSL-related patches as possible. | 14:07 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, thanks for doing some sponsoring :-) | 14:07 |
| schopin | yes, that too ^ :-) | 14:07 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, and sorry, I didn't even say hey, how are you doing? | 14:07 |
| GunnarHj | schopin: Ack. | 14:08 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: yw. I'm alright, thanks. Hope you are as well. | 14:09 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, I am, thanks! | 14:26 |
| oSoMoN | hey GunnarHj, I rebuilt the firefox snap in the candidate channel with the new snapcraft for all supported architectures, and consequently I closed the candidate/snapcraft6 branch | 14:29 |
| GunnarHj | oSoMoN: Thanks for the hint. Then I'll switch channel again. | 14:31 |
| GunnarHj | * True winter here. -4°C and snowing. | 14:31 |
| oSoMoN | GunnarHj, I the switch might happen automatically, when a channel you were tracking is closed | 14:32 |
| oSoMoN | i.e. candidate/snapcraft6 will fall back to candidate | 14:32 |
| GunnarHj | Ok, good. | 14:32 |
| oSoMoN | s/I the switch/I think the switch/ | 14:32 |
| oSoMoN | so it was just a FYI | 14:32 |
| seb128 | didrocks, sorry but I ended up sending another MIR your way, bug #1952924, it basically replace the wireplumber one for this cycle | 14:54 |
| ubottu | Bug 1952924 in pipewire-media-session (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pipewire-media-session" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1952924 | 14:54 |
| seb128 | didrocks, hopefully it's an easy one, it's a split of code that was part of pipewire until impish | 14:55 |
| didrocks | we will dispatch it at our next meeting | 15:19 |
| didrocks | but second time reviewing a MIR for nothing, as we need to rereview it one propsoed next cycle | 15:19 |
| didrocks | I’ll look for the correct status to set there | 15:20 |
| didrocks | however, you need to subscribe ubuntu-mir on the second MIR for us to pick it up | 15:20 |
| seb128 | didrocks, ah right, thanks. Well it's not nothing, we still want pipewire default and will need wireplumber, but that's post LTS now | 15:22 |
| seb128 | sorry, we lack an audio maintainer, I'm still unsure what's the right decision between those | 15:23 |
| seb128 | I mean I decided to go that way but I'm not confident it's the right choice, but we need to make one | 15:23 |
| didrocks | no worry | 15:23 |
| === hellswor1 is now known as hellsworth | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!