/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/12/02/#ubuntu-devel.txt

bdmurrayjawn-smith: ocrfeeder is still stuck so I'll override it00:02
jawn-smithbdmurray: thanks!00:04
bdmurraymwhudson: does  bug 1952093 need fixing in Jammy?00:43
ubottuBug 1952093 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) "Seeded snaps broken in the Focal dailies" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195209300:43
mwhudsonbdmurray: no00:43
* mwhudson bug statuses00:43
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
Unit193slyon: Hello!  I hear you're a new core-dev and may be keen to try out sponsoring, if so could you take a look at https://unit193.net/source/pastebinit_1.5.1-1ubuntu1.dsc ?09:07
slyonUnit193: heh, not that new after all, but anyways I'll put that on my list to review later! :)09:14
Unit193\o/09:15
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
slyonUnit193: LGTM! Did you submit those patches to Debian, too? They look rather generic and useful for Debian.09:44
Unit193Trying to poke the right people about this, kinda dorment so going "upstream" first.  That didn't start out as an Ubuntu upload, in fact.09:45
slyonUnit193: ok. May I suggest you doing the "submittodebian" limbo at least? So it will be available in the Debian bug tracker for Simon to pick up.09:54
slyonOtherwise that's a very nice diff, the only thing I'd like to suggest for the future would be using DEP-3 headers: https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/09:54
Unit193Yeah, likely a good idea.  If nothing else, to silence lintian. :P10:00
Unit193Thanks slyon!10:02
schopinUnit193: for the record, the newest, shiniest Core Dev is jawn-smith (Americas tz) ;-)10:09
schopinbryceh: thanks for the upload, duly noted for the Core Dev thing :)10:12
schopinbryceh: regarding git-ubuntu, it wasn't very clear that (in most cases?) it's pretty-much read-only. The recent developments for rich history incorporations are a step in the right direction, but it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu, which AIUI are basically all in main?10:17
Unit193schopin: Haha yes!  I did see that, but not pokable right now, seems he's gone. :P10:18
schopinMost people these days look for the "github project" when trying to contribute, or at least the Git repo. "Ubuntu git" in Google gives me the git-ubuntu tool as in the first page, and the only relevant result if you want to contribute to Ubuntu and not just install git.10:22
schopinbryceh: That's why I find it confusing. However, I'm using it for my merges and am loving it :)10:23
schopindoko_: waveform: does this ICE on armhf look familiar to either of you? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/571874086/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-armhf.postgresql-14_14.1-1build1_BUILDING.txt.gz11:37
=== doko_ is now known as doko
schopinMy Google-fu gives me some bug report related to inline assembly, but the affected file doesn't have any inline assembly.11:38
dokoschopin, no, I can have a look later this week11:38
dokobut: "The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem." so maybe retry the build first11:39
KBarHi. I was having a look at bash's startup files and found this particular line in /etc/bash.bashrc in this script that displays information about sudo the first time bash is invoked: case " $(groups) " in *\ admin\ *|*\ sudo\ *)11:43
KBarIsn't the group called "adm" these days?11:44
waveformschopin, no doesn't look familiar but this thread from a few days ago looks eerily familiar: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GD3ABSWD6HHTNEKV2EJY4PXABQ245UCZ/ (and doesn't involved inline assembly)11:45
KBarNevermind, "adm" is actually used for system monitoring tasks, as per Debian Wiki.11:50
schopindoko: already the second build :/11:56
schopinwaveform: I've seen the thread (well, glanced at it to find the bugzilla link), and on the bugzilla from what I understand (which isn't much) it *is* an inline assembly issue. Perhaps the asm comes from functions that are inlined in my source, though.11:57
waveformschopin, could well be -- may be worth trying the -DSTAP_SDT_ARG_CONSTRAINT workaround12:04
waveformschopin, -DSTAP_SDT_ARG_CONSTRAINT=g that is12:08
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:15
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:15
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:15
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:15
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:15
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:16
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:16
rbasakschopin: it's only relevant for those with upload rights to the packages handled by git-ubuntu> isn't that the same for basically every GitHub repo, where only one person or a small set of people can commit? But anyone can file a pull request against any repo, and that's the same with git-ubuntu. We've also been adding a repository for nearly any package on request, including packages in universe.12:16
cpaelzer_rbasak: something makes your msg repeat ?12:16
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
rbasakSorry!12:17
schopinrbasak: it's actually possible to use the merge proposal process if I want to contribute to a git-ubuntu package? I have been misled, then. Also, note that my comments must be contextualized: I expanded on my MOTU application comment that "There is no clear-cut way to contribute to an existing package", specifically the git-ubuntu remark in there.12:21
rbasakschopin: you can file an MP against a git-ubuntu repository, and ask any uploader to review and upload it from there.12:28
rbasakI would like to adjust the sponsoring queue report generator to display these requests, but that's not done yet.12:28
rbasakHowever the actual MP part should work fine.12:28
schopinrbasak: sure, filing the MP is possible, I was more curious about the standard MP/PR/MR lifecycle : Open, Closed, Merged. I was under the impression that the uploader would basically pull the branch locally, upload the package, and close the MP manually.12:32
rbasakschopin: right, except if using rich history preservation, the MP will get marked as Merged automatically.12:37
schopinCool, I wasn't sure about that bit.12:40
rbasakTo be clear, one missing piece right now is that if you file an MP against a git-ubuntu branch and do nothing else, the default reviewer will be a bot that will never review your MP.12:41
rbasakBut the MP mechanism itself does work, if you find a reviewer to review and upload the MP.12:41
schopinNice, I think I might give that a try for my next patch in need of sponsor.12:43
schopinWhich gives me a nice segue into...12:44
schopinLooking for a sponsor for LP: #1953023 :D12:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1953023 in ssl-cert (Ubuntu) "Fail to detect key length with OpenSSL 3" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195302312:44
rbasakSure I'll sponsor that for you.12:46
rbasakWould you like to try a git-ubuntu MP? If not I'm happy to just upload.12:47
schopinI'd rather not, my time and brain don't have the capacity for it right now :)12:51
rbasakSure12:51
rbasak(done)12:56
xnoxschopin:  i am working on upgrading to 2.1 but yes fixing FTBFS is needed too13:58
slyonddstreet: I'm currently preparing a round of systemd SRUs, is there anything to add from your side? Especially wrt to LP: #1950508 ? (There isn't any patch for Impish yet, tho that is marked as 'in progress' on LP)15:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1950508 in systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) "unified cgroup incorrectly used in container on host with legacy/hybrid cgroup" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195050815:01
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
=== genii-core is now known as genii
geniiSorry, would just a clarification point on do-rlease-upgrade. I know LTS-LTS is not offered until point release, and assumed it was the same with interim release upgrades, but would like to double-check19:13
bdmurraygenii: Could you elaborate what you mean by interim release upgrades? When 22.04 is released upgrades from 21.10 to it will be enabled.19:17
geniibdmurray: Interim releases would be all non-LTS. So for instance any non-LTS to either the next incremental non-LTS or for instance non-LTS to LTS is what I'm interested in. Whether upon initial rlease it's available to upgrade to, or becomes available when the first point release happens19:21
bdmurrayOnly LTS releases have point releases, regardless for non-LTS releases upgrades are enabled shortly after the next release is available19:22
geniiOK, thanks for the clarification19:23
xnoxgenii:  if there are no upgrade blockers, the upgrades are enabled more or less straight away. in some previous releases there was a delay in enabling upgrades due to upgrade-specific bugs.19:29
geniiOK19:31
dbungertso python debug packages are generally going away, right?  so this sort of thing would be appropriate?  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Y7xYrj9RHn/19:59
mwhudsongood morning20:25
dbungertvorlon: from the meeting today you mention ignoring pyqt5 for the time being. However it is relevant to node-jquery.  Can you elaborate on the pyqt5 comment?  I think my linked patch should fix this.20:47
vorlondbungert: I meant that it seemed like it might be something else in the dependency chain that would work itself out without Foundations and therefore I wasn't going to assign it out, but if you have a better analysis, let's get it fixed :)21:08
dbungertwill do, thanks!21:08
jawn-smithdbungert: do you need a sponsor for that patch?21:12
dbungertjawn-smith: I think we should upstream to Debian.  The question is, is this urgent enough to upload to Ubuntu in the mean time.21:14
vorlonyes it is21:14
vorlon;)21:14
dbungertI'll request a sponsor then21:14
dbungertand upstream it21:15
jawn-smithdbungert: just let me know when everything is fully ready :)21:15
dbungertjawn-smith: I'll send you a patch with a reasonable changelog after this meeting21:15
jawn-smithsounds good21:15
=== amurray_ is now known as amurray
mwhudsonDepends: cryptsetup openssl (not considered)22:48
mwhudsonoh good22:48
dbungertjawn-smith: LP: #1953083, thanks for volunteering23:08
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1953083 in pyqt5 (Ubuntu) "ftbfs with py3.10" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/195308323:08
mwhudsonhuh how can preinst files use debconf templates?23:25
jawn-smithdbungert: on it, thanks!23:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!