[07:01] <RikMills> schopin: please do not rebuild qtbase-opensource-src for openssl 3 at the moment (if you would have done)
[07:01] <RikMills> debian/ubuntu Qt maintainers need to make some fixes before this can be done in a way that would not break other things
[07:01] <RikMills> thanks
[08:42] <schopin> RikMills: good thing you tell me, it was planned for this morning!
[08:46] <schopin> Could a core dev retry this build please? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cryptography/3.4.8-1/+build/22579369
[09:39] <amurray> schopin: done
[09:39] <schopin> thanks!
[11:33] <ircuser1> hey
[11:37] <ircuser1> how can i contribute to Ubuntu as a developer?
[12:04] <KBar> The `alert` alias included in .bashrc is incomplete. I filed a bug report #1953151
[12:05] <KBar> The fix is to add a single asterisk after the `[;&|]` bracket expression:
[12:05] <KBar> alias alert='notify-send --urgency=low -i "$([ $? = 0 ] && echo  terminal || echo error)" "$(history|tail -n1|sed -e '\''s/^\s*[0-9]\+\s*//;s/[;&|]*\s*alert$//'\'')"'
[12:19] <amurray> ircuser1: not sure how up to date the old docs are but a good staring point would be to take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment
[12:23] <seb128> KBar, you might want to add a patch or mention the suggested fix on the report
[12:23] <seb128> KBar, it might also be useful to include an example of cmd in the description
[12:30] <KBar> seb128, unfortunately I do not have experience or knowledge to be able to do that. I'm learning every day but I'm not there yet.
[12:31] <seb128> KBar, doing what? including an example? it's just writting down what you typed to trigger the issue
[12:31] <seb128> KBar, and you mentioned a suggest fix here, it should be easy to type the same line on launchpad?
[12:31] <KBar> seb128, adding a patch.
[12:32] <KBar> Isn't that done through diff
[12:33] <KBar> I can add that information to the description, no problem.
[12:35] <KBar> You don't have to be rude or condescending, seb128. The suggested fix is already included in the bug report.
[12:35] <seb128> KBar, a patch would be nice but the description is better than nothing
[12:35] <seb128> KBar, I've been rude?
[12:38] <seb128> KBar, if you can to write a patch it's basically 'cp .bashrc .bashrc.fixed', edit bashrc.fixed and 'diff -u > .bashrc .bashrc.fixed > bashrc.patch'
[12:38] <seb128> if you want*
[12:38] <seb128> sorry diff -u .bashrc .bashrc.fixed > bashrc.patch'
[13:01] <KBar> seb128, patch attached. Thanks for guidance. Sorry, I should have been more clear and probably just asked "how?".
[13:01] <KBar> My bad.
[13:02] <seb128> KBar, np, sorry if I came across as rude with my reply
[13:11] <KBar> All good. You probably were a bit confused and geniunely wanted to help. It was just a misunderstanding/miscommunication.
[13:18] <KBar> Anyway, thank you and see you around.
[14:34] <schopin> xnox: fyi I'm looking into the nodejs/openssl autopkgtest failure, I believe I have a fix.
[14:56] <jawn-smith> schopin: lmk if you need a sponsor
[15:08] <jawn-smith> dbungert: pyqt5 has some autopkgtest regressions that upon first glance make it seem that other packages need the -dbg dependency removed
[15:09] <dbungert> jawn-smith: thanks for the heads up, I'll investigate
[15:09] <jawn-smith> dbungert: thanks!
[15:24] <rbasak> jamespage, coreycb: we synced python-django 3.2 and it's in jammy-proposed right now. Looking at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.jammy/rdepends/python-django/python3-django, can you check that this won't affect you please?
[15:24] <rbasak> I don't see any relevant dep8 tests that will help us here.
[15:45] <coreycb> rbasak: that should be fine, thanks!
[19:13] <dbungert> Retest clicks?  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/jm9zGJgx4r/
[19:14] <bdmurray> dbungert: did you generate that using retry-autopkgtest ?
[19:14] <dbungert> bdmurray: no I did not, where can I find that script
[19:15] <bdmurray> dbungert: it's actually retry-autopkgtest-regressions in ubuntu-archive-tools
[19:19] <bdmurray> mdeslaur: Should I unsubscribe the ubuntu sponsors team from bug 1946007?
[19:21] <mclemenceau> hey schopin, I'm giving you some help on openssl transition, I did the libica upgrade to 3.9.0, ready to be sponsored
[19:21] <jawn-smith> mclemenceau: I'll take a look!
[19:22] <mclemenceau> sweet it is LP#1953087. but I'm sure you could figure it out :)
[19:24] <bdmurray> I'll take this logrotate merge (bug 1952602)
[19:26] <bdmurray> dbungert: what I'm getting as is if you can tell someone a retry-autopkgtest-regressions command to run that might be easier than pastebin'ing the urls
[19:28] <dbungert> bdmurray: ah, got it.  It looks like thought that script doesn't support adding more triggers, right?  at least 3 of the ones I'm asking for had additional triggers.  but I like the idea you're suggesting.
[19:28] <bdmurray> dbungert: oh probably not
[20:46] <bdmurray> dbungert: back to your original request - I clicked the links
[20:47] <dbungert> bdmurray: Thanks!  the retry script looks cool, I'm playing with the log-regex argument.