-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wfview [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2b-1] (no packageset) | 00:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted l3afpad [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.18.1.11-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhipi-perl [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.86-2] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wfview [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.2b-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhipi-perl [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.86-2] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wfview [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2b-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wfview [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2b-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cubeb [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.0~git20211015.d512bfa+ds-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted l3afpad [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.18.1.11-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted l3afpad [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.18.1.11-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhipi-perl [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.86-2] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mpl-animators [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.0-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted l3afpad [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.18.1.11-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhipi-perl [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.86-2] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wfview [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.2b-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted l3afpad [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.18.1.11-1] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhipi-perl [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.86-2] | 03:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cachelib [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.4.1-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted l3afpad [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.18.1.11-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted locust [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.3-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sqlmodel [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.0.4-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wfview [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.2b-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gourmand [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.0-3] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polyline [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.4.0-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhipi-perl [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.86-2] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wfview [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2b-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mallard-rng [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.0-1] | 03:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mssql-django [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0-1~exp1] | 03:03 | |
=== juliank is now known as Guest5123 | ||
ginggs | what kind of hint should we use when migration-reference/0 doesn't do what we need? | 08:59 |
---|---|---|
ginggs | looking at https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libg/libgpuarray/jammy/i386 where a new test dependency isn't available | 09:00 |
ginggs | and https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/liggghts/jammy/i386 where the package was removed from release, and does not fail the migration-reference/0 test | 09:01 |
cpaelzer_ | ginggs: well, the pre migration-reference/0 of "I've analyzed it, it is ok to be bad, let us mark it to not expect a good result" was force-reset-test | 09:02 |
ginggs | cpaelzer_: i took this to mean "don't use force-reset any more" https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/commit/?id=a794e3ac1f94a392ec272e3e0e49eba07ce87c78 | 09:08 |
ubottu | Commit a794e3a in ~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu "manual reset-test hints should no longer be needed, superseded in favor of baseline retesting with migration-reference/0" | 09:08 |
cpaelzer_ | ginggs: I took it as "do not use if migration-ref/0 could do it for you | 09:10 |
ginggs | right, but adding a force-badtest hint and then dropping it once the package has migrated and "regressed" should work too, I'm just trying to find out what is preferred | 09:11 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dask [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2021.09.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2] | 09:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aadi-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 09:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 09:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 09:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu2] | 09:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 09:51 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 09:55 | |
sil2100 | hm, interesting, the first OEM package SRU that I accepted today still didn't pop up with new binaries. The build finished 27 minutes ago and is still 'Uploading build' | 09:57 |
sil2100 | Hope it's not some weird outage? | 09:57 |
sil2100 | ...maybe it is | 09:58 |
sil2100 | ginggs: I think it's still acceptable to submit normal hints for such cases | 10:00 |
RikMills | sil2100: I've seen the same long delay in 'Uploading build' phase on multiple things (inc PPA builds) today | 10:03 |
RikMills | it gets there eventually | 10:03 |
RikMills | I guess slow networking somewhere | 10:04 |
RikMills | ^ cjwatson ^ ? | 10:04 |
mwhudson | sil2100: hey could you trigger a focal live server build with livecd-rootfs from proposed somehow? | 10:14 |
ginggs | sil2100: thanks, I created an MP https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/412796 | 10:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-aadi-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 10:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 10:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [20.04~ubuntu2] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 10:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aaden-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-cable-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aadi-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-carrie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu2] | 10:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 11:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 11:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu3] | 11:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu3] | 11:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu3] | 11:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-carrie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-carnell-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:08 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hello vorlon aom wants libyuv-dev on i386... | 12:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | they just removed libyuv from being an embeeded code copy inside aom to a split package | 12:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | so should be an easy build | 12:42 |
lucasmoura | Hi sil2100, can you take a look on the SRU for ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.4.2 ? He have already performed the verifications for it and we believe it is okay to upload the package into the updates pocket | 13:14 |
sil2100 | lucasmoura: sure! I'll look at it later in the day, could you re-ping me in a bit? Since I'm doing some +1 stuff now and don't want to context switch too much | 13:43 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (impish-proposed) [1:1.90.7+git20210222+tod1-0ubuntu4~21.10.1] | 14:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.5] | 15:05 | |
lucasmoura | hi sil2100, as requested, just a reminder on the ubuntu-advantage-tools SRU | 15:20 |
sil2100 | lucasmoura: on it! | 15:32 |
lucasmoura | thanks sil2100 :) | 15:33 |
sil2100 | lucasmoura: so I see it has also been accepted into xenial-proposed - is this meant to also go to xenial-updates still? | 15:42 |
lucasmoura | sil2100, as far as I know, yes | 15:42 |
sil2100 | Done o/ | 16:03 |
ricotz | sil2100, hello :), libreoffice/impish is ready https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1951738 | 16:07 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1951738 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.2.3 for impish" [Undecided, New] | 16:07 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtkmm3.0 (focal-proposed/main) [3.24.2-1build1 => 3.24.2-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 16:08 | |
vorlon | mwhudson: opencv rdeps fail on other archs> argh that would've saved me quite a lot of time if I had noticed this three weeks ago | 16:28 |
vorlon | mwhudson: yeah I am suspecting compiler bug; I don't have capacity to chase this to ground though | 16:29 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: libyuv-dev sorted | 16:38 |
vorlon | mwhudson: also, what the hell, now opencv revdeps are failing worse than before | 16:42 |
vorlon | which was totally not reproducible for me locally | 16:43 |
vorlon | and still isn't, whee | 16:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gcc-12-cross to i386-whitelist in jammy | 17:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libyuv to i386-whitelist in jammy | 17:01 | |
vorlon | schopin: the m2crypto autopkgtest regressions are interesting, this is a compiled python extension that links against libssl1.1 and installing the openssl binary package causes its behavior to regress?! | 17:39 |
vorlon | schopin: also the autopkgtest fails for me here, even in the release pocket: tests/test_rsa.py::RSATestCase::test_sign_and_verify_rsassa_pss FAILED [ 62%] | 17:40 |
vorlon | so I don't think this should be a blocker | 17:40 |
schopin | I'm a bit confused too, indeed. If you compile against OpenSSL 3 there's some tests to disable. | 17:40 |
schopin | vorlon: And regarding the BIO thing, basically if BIO_gets returns 0, the wrapper checks if there's an SSL error registered somewhere, and if so, throws an exception. Which is why it didn't fail when I tried to run the one test. | 17:42 |
schopin | Gotta love those globals | 17:43 |
vorlon | schopin: so, I can reproduce the openssl3-induced autopkgtest failures by simply copying the /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf from openssl 3. yeah I'm not going to block on this | 17:43 |
vorlon | we should fix it, but really looks to me like m2crypto being pretty broken on its own | 17:43 |
vorlon | so, force hint added | 17:44 |
vorlon | schopin: should m2crypto's bio_gets() implementation be fixed to clear the errors first, errno style? | 17:46 |
schopin | vorlon: I think that would make sense, yes. | 17:48 |
schopin | I can do it tomorrow if you want. | 17:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytest-skip-markers [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset) | 18:23 | |
jeroen___ | Hello | 18:34 |
jeroen___ | I was wondering if it would be possible to import nodejs-16 from debian-experimental for the release: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libnode-dev | 18:35 |
jeroen___ | It seems stuck in Debian because it requires to update libicu, which seems tricky. | 18:36 |
jeroen___ | Currently Debian testing still has nodejs-12, which will be EOL exactly around the release of Ubuntu-22.04 https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/. Hence it may be important to get this upgrade in rather sooner than later. | 18:37 |
vorlon | jeroen___: may be better to discuss this on #ubuntu-devel; the release team is not likely to be driving a node transition | 19:00 |
jeroen___ | OK thanks. Will copy there. | 19:07 |
vorlon | ImportError: /usr/lib/libgdal.so.28: undefined symbol: _ZN6libdap5ErrorD1Ev | 19:28 |
vorlon | >_< | 19:28 |
vorlon | library regresses supported symbols, nothing catches it to stop it from migrating to the release pocket, and autopkgtest of indirect revdep fails locally but passed on infra, wheee | 19:32 |
vorlon | s/supported/exported/ | 19:32 |
cjwatson | RikMills: I'm on leave, but I believe there was some kind of transatlantic network outage this morning that slowed a bunch of stuff down | 19:33 |
vorlon | oh haha no, this error doesn't cause the autopkgtest to exit nonzero | 19:33 |
* vorlon facepalm | 19:33 | |
vorlon | and then I upgrade to packages from proposed and instead I get: | 19:35 |
vorlon | ImportError: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cv2.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: _ZTIN2cv3dnn14dnn4_v202106085LayerE | 19:35 |
vorlon | so, quality stack, all around | 19:35 |
vorlon | 0000000000354fd8 g DO .data.rel.ro0000000000000018 Base typeinfo for cv::dnn::dnn4_v20211004::Layer | 19:38 |
vorlon | sure, why not have the type name change with every revision, that's how shared libraries work right | 19:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.103-0ubuntu5~20.04.5] | 20:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytest-skip-markers [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.0-2] | 20:04 | |
vorlon | well, britney still doesn't seem happy to consider the libssl1.1 binary from the release pocket that's left behind | 21:04 |
* vorlon tries some more hinting | 21:04 | |
vorlon | might be time to see about SMOOTH_UPDATES as juliank suggested, tho | 21:04 |
vorlon | sil2100, bdmurray: ^^ fwiw, I've made this config change to britney, should give us better results automatically wrt no-longer-built binaries (such as old sonames) staying around in the release pocket and being considered for installability | 21:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.5.4+dfsg-9ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 21:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opencv [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.5.4+dfsg-9ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 21:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencv [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.4+dfsg-9ubuntu1] | 21:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opencv [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [4.5.4+dfsg-9ubuntu1] | 21:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] | 21:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] | 21:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] | 21:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] | 21:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.20-2+ubuntu1] | 21:58 | |
mwhudson | vorlon: why do we build cryptsetup at all on i386? | 22:01 |
mwhudson | vorlon: (is there some way i can answer this for myself?) | 22:02 |
mwhudson | oh systemd depends on it, maybe? | 22:03 |
vorlon | answering it for yourself> would be to look at the seed output for i386 | 22:11 |
vorlon | and yeah https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.impish/all says systemd | 22:12 |
vorlon | whee, lots of stuff migrating now | 23:25 |
bdmurray | vorlon: can you have a look at the promotion in bug 1930868 - comment #9 | 23:29 |
ubottu | Bug 1930868 in linux-firmware (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU][Jammy]Package firmware-sof-signed (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/lib/firmware/intel/sof/sof-apl.ri', which is also in package linux-firmware 1.197" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1930868 | 23:29 |
vorlon | bdmurray: done | 23:34 |
vorlon | schopin: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+publishinghistory congrats :) | 23:45 |
bdmurray | well I guess that answers my question about the fix for bug 1951943 in Jammy | 23:46 |
ubottu | Bug 1951943 in openssl (Ubuntu Jammy) "Engine crashes when loading the configuration more than once" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1951943 | 23:46 |
mwhudson | nice | 23:47 |
sarnold | schopin: nice :) | 23:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [7.4.16-1ubuntu2.3] | 23:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.4 [source] (focal-proposed) [7.4.3-4ubuntu2.8] | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!