[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pfstools [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[00:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[01:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dh-python [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [5.20211213] (i386-whitelist)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dh-python [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [5.20211213]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pfstools [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pfstools [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pfstools [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pfstools [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pfstools [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pfstools [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[07:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (jammy-proposed) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.56.0+dfsg1+llvm-2ubuntu1]
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.9.0~0.20.04.4]
[15:01] <ahasenack> hi release team, I was fixing the libyang DEP8 failure via https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/libyang/+git/libyang/+merge/413052, but we already have libyang2 in the archive and uploading libyang now fails ( libyang-tools_1.0.225-1.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 1.0.225-1.1ubuntu1 <= 2.0.112-6)
[15:01] <ahasenack> shall I just hint bad-test libyang then?
[15:01] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyang/+bug/1954594 is the dep8 bug of libyang
[15:15] <seb128> ahasenack, thaat
[15:15] <seb128> ahasenack, that sounds like a workaround, if we have a conflict we should probably update one of the package to stop building the binary
[16:06] <ahasenack> src:libyang2 produces libyang-tools which is a transitional package, that pulls in libyang2-tools
[16:07] <ahasenack> I don't know what the debian's maintainer plan was :/
[16:07] <ahasenack> maybe they thought libyang (1) would be gone after the libyang2 upload
[16:12] <ahasenack> that being said, it's in proposed, so a hint won't help now
[16:16] <seb128> ahasenack, we could easily remove the transitional build from the old source and if needed add a provide to the new binary
[16:16] <ahasenack> sounds good, I'll try that
[16:16] <ahasenack> I was hoping I didn't need to add more delta to these two, but they are stuck as is
[16:37] <ahasenack> I'm wondering if removing my upload of src:libyang to jammy-proposed and badtesting the existing src:libyang package in jammy would be enough? Because most (if not all) of the rest was already rebuilt with libyang2
[16:50] <tjaalton> any idea why mesa is still stuck in jammy-proposed? excuses output says it's trying to migrate for some time now
[16:50] <vorlon> tjaalton: if you look at update_output you'll see that migrating it would make some packages newly uninstallable
[16:50] <vorlon> (from memory; I don't have that tab in front of me right now)
[16:52] <tjaalton> ok I'm seeing something for riscv64
[16:52] <vorlon> ahasenack: done
[16:53] <vorlon> tjaalton: sometimes that's misleading, but in this case yeah it's riscv64-specific (7 newly-uninstallable binaries, all on riscv64)
[16:53] <vorlon> ahasenack: once this migrates can I remove quagga? :)
[16:54] <ahasenack> that's what brought me on top of libyang
[16:54] <ahasenack> frr (and quagga)
[16:55] <vorlon> ugh what to do with pytorch, it ftbfs in Debian for me but differently than Ubuntu
[16:56] <vorlon> oh, new libtensorpipe-dev, let's see
[16:56] <tjaalton> ok, probably caused by dropping llvm support from mesa on riscv64, since it doesn't have JIT
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (impish-proposed) [20211028.00-0ubuntu1~21.10.0]
[17:11] <tjaalton> vorlon: so mesa-opencl-icd is not available on riscv64 anymore, should the migration failure be overridden or what?
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20211028.00-0ubuntu1~21.04.0]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (focal-proposed) [20211028.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0]
[17:15] <vorlon> tjaalton: we don't override these, but have to work out how to fix the installability problem for the arch.  Should these binaries be built differently to not depend on mesa-opencl-icd?  Are they now all build failures and should be removed?
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20211028.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]
[17:17] <vorlon> tjaalton: libhmsbeagle for example build-depends on ocl-icd-opencl-dev | opencl-dev so looks like it should now properly be dep-wait in the future so we should just drop those binaries (I'll do that now, then keep looking)
[17:17] <tjaalton> vorlon: ok, thanks. so far I've only looked at rdepends
[17:17] <vorlon> actually it's the build-dependency on pocl-opencl-icd | mesa-opencl-icd | opencl-icd that's operative here
[17:20] <tjaalton> mrbayes-mpi depends on libhmsbeagle1v5
[17:21] <bdmurray> mitya57: Shouldn't bug 1950193 also be fixed in Impish?
[17:22] <tjaalton> and python3-pyopencl depends on opencl-icd which mesa-opencl-icd Provides. this explains the other uninstallable python libs
[17:23] <tjaalton> I'll look into building just the icd bits on riscv64 after holidays
[17:23] <tjaalton> might be doable
[17:26] <tjaalton> looks like llvm 14 will have support for JIT on riscv64, finally
[17:29] <vorlon> tjaalton: pyopencl looks like it will need work, it build-depends on ocl-icd-opencl-dev which exists on riscv64, but then at runtime has a dep on the mesa bits (...I assume, I can't keep track of all the virtual package names).
[17:29] <vorlon> opencl-icd
[17:29] <tjaalton> ah ok
[17:30] <vorlon> actually pocl is built on riscv64 in -proposed, so if that migrated it might unblock some things?
[17:31] <vorlon> and that's blocked on llvm-toolchain-11 breaking aflplusplus, heh
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xfwm4 [source] (focal-proposed) [4.14.5-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:31] <tjaalton> oh right, things would be fine with pocl
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected squid3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.27-1ubuntu1.13]
[17:44] <mitya57> bdmurray: I'll do it.
[17:45] <bdmurray> mitya57: Great thank! Let me know and I'll get it accepted.
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.9.0~0.18.04.4]
[18:18] <vorlon> anyone understand why cmake in -proposed depends on dh-elpa-helper?  seems strange
[18:23] <vorlon> juliank: armhf autopkgtest units still falling over with no useful log info
[18:23] <schopin> vorlon: I checked https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-elpa/+bug/1951066 but I don't see any rationale for that specific change :/
[18:25] <vorlon> schopin: seems to be a runtime dependency that results from build-depending on dh-elpa
[18:26] <vorlon> and this is because cmake-data ships an emacs extension in the package >_<
[18:38] <ahasenack> vorlon: frr migrated \o/
[19:21] <kanashiro> vorlon, now we have a src:rails which builds and generates binaries (no tests are executed), I tried to sync src:ruby-tzinfo/2.0.4-2 from Debian and it got rejected because we already have published binaries in jammy-proposed. Could you help me here?
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (impish-proposed/main) [1:1.90.7+git20210222+tod1-0ubuntu4~21.10.1 => 1:1.90.7+git20210222+tod1-0ubuntu4~21.10.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:36] <vorlon> kanashiro: the command you want, fwiw, is 'copy-package -b -e 2.0.4-3 --force-same-destination -s jammy-proposed -y ruby-tzinfo' (done)
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.5 => 1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:38] <kanashiro> vorlon, thanks (also for the tip :)
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mlpost [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset)
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (impish-proposed/universe) [5.15.2+dfsg-12 => 5.15.2+dfsg-12ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[20:04] <mitya57> bdmurray: ^^
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [source] (impish-proposed) [5.15.2+dfsg-12ubuntu1]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [source] (focal-proposed) [5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu2]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0] (no packageset)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [s390x] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0] (no packageset)
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0] (no packageset)
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [arm64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0] (no packageset)
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [armhf] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0] (no packageset)
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mlpost [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.0] (no packageset)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.0]
[21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-persistent (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4+nmu2ubuntu1 => 1.0.4+nmu2ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-persistent (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.14 => 1.0.14ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-persistent (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.15 => 1.0.15ubuntu0.21.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables-persistent (impish-proposed/universe) [1.0.15 => 1.0.15ubuntu0.21.10.1] (no packageset)
[21:55] <chiluk> tjaalton: did you see my e-mail about freeipa-server and client?  I just want to make sure it didn't fall into a filter somewhere.
[21:57] <chiluk> If you don't know of any specific concerns it looks to me like it should just be resynced with debian.  I'll attempt to do that in the next few days and try to do some testing.
[21:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.46-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.46-0ubuntu1.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[21:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (impish-proposed/main) [2.2.46-0ubuntu3 => 2.2.46-0ubuntu3.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (focal-proposed) [9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (focal-proposed) [2.2.46-0ubuntu1.1]
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (impish-proposed) [2.2.46-0ubuntu3.1]
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nezha-boot0 (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.0.1+11+g70d35f2-0ubuntu1]