| lotuspsychje | good morning | 02:50 |
|---|---|---|
| marcoagpinto | hi! | 05:28 |
| gry | hi | 05:48 |
| ducasse | good morning | 07:58 |
| KBar | Hey. Today I noticed that the main page of the website has this picture: https://assets.ubuntu.com/v1/e1d3143f-laptop.png | 11:35 |
| KBar | On the picture, Unity is showcased. | 11:35 |
| KBar | I don't have a GitHub account, so I couldn't report a bug. It's a bit weird that the website isn't on Launchpad. | 11:38 |
| lotuspsychje | KBar: howd you notice thats unity | 12:01 |
| lotuspsychje | and not sure the website bugs goto LP | 12:02 |
| KBar | lotuspsychje: zoom in. The top panel, indicators, color scheme, the Launcher and the infamous Amazon launcher give it away. | 12:19 |
| KBar | lotuspsychje: the "Report a bug on this site" sends me here: https://github.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fcanonical-web-and-design%2Fubuntu.com%2Fissues%2Fnew%3Fbody%3D%250a%250a%250a---%250a%2AReported%2520from%3A%2520https%3A%2F%2Fubuntu.com%2F%2A | 12:20 |
| lotuspsychje | we do still have unity desktop as package, but pics should be better showing the right current version indeed | 12:22 |
| Maik | that is indeed the good old Unity | 12:27 |
| Maik | KBar: where did you see that pic? | 12:34 |
| Maik | i can't find it anywhere on the ubuntu website | 12:35 |
| Maik | ah, got it | 12:36 |
| Maik | they probably still use it because Ubuntu 16.04 is still supported through ESM | 12:37 |
| lotuspsychje | i had a FF snap crash once on 22.04 | 13:16 |
| Maik | lotuspsychje: i don't count that because it's a development version | 13:18 |
| Maik | bugs are about to happen | 13:18 |
| lotuspsychje | yeah its still early indeed | 13:18 |
| Maik | Khepra: don't expect many, IF anyone actually, to answer your question | 13:19 |
| Maik | irc isn't as active anymore as it was years ago ;) | 13:20 |
| Khepra | yeah. well anyway I was wondering if it's a pervasive problem or not. even silence is a datapoint | 13:21 |
| Maik | most of the people that hang around are just idlers | 13:21 |
| Maik | you have crashes on debian with FF snap so i'd turn to the debian guys for further help | 13:22 |
| Khepra | Maik: well for the same reason lotuspsychje cited referall to the vendors, asking #debian (where I'm regular) would be equally wrong | 13:23 |
| Khepra | snaps aren't supported by distros. snapd itself IS, but individual snaps are not | 13:24 |
| Maik | then ask the mozilla guys.... | 13:24 |
| Maik | or whoever builds the snap package | 13:25 |
| KBar | Khepra: well, maybe you can find something here: https://forum.snapcraft.io/search?q=firefox | 13:25 |
| Khepra | no my question was specifically to Ubuntu users. Not the vendors, I'm not reporting a bug (I don't know what the bug is even). I am merely asking if useres of the snap see it crashing when the upgrade hapopens. | 13:25 |
| Maik | we know that by now and as you can see no one replied because the majority here are idlers | 13:26 |
| Khepra | that's okay. I'm merely responding to mis-redirections that I should ask elsewhere. | 13:26 |
| Maik | so you'll never really know | 13:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
