| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gallery-dl (focal-backports/primary) [1.20.0-1~bpo20.04.1] | 02:20 | |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| cpaelzer | didrocks: good morning, could I bother you with my AA-pings of yesterday? It seems most AAs are still in the deserved winter-break | 08:31 |
|---|---|---|
| didrocks | cpaelzer: oh sure, let me backlog | 08:32 |
| didrocks | ah, there were an autodemote | 08:33 |
| didrocks | interesting, change-override is telling me that everything is already in main (fuse3 source and binary packages), while rmadison disagrees and only list the source as being in main | 08:36 |
| cpaelzer | yeah and open-vm-tools is stuck in an component mismatch missing fuse3 binary | 08:36 |
| cpaelzer | maybe one of those -proposed vs -release cases? | 08:37 |
| cpaelzer | hmm, no it seems there is no -proposed of fuse3 right now | 08:37 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: well, it wouldn’t explain the rmadison vs change-override mismatch | 08:38 |
| didrocks | either someone promoted it in between and we are missing a publisher cycle | 08:38 |
| didrocks | either… I don’t really know. Unfortunately, those changes are not reflected in the publishing history: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fuse3/3.10.5-1/+publishinghistory | 08:38 |
| didrocks | but yeah: | 08:39 |
| didrocks | rmadison -s jammy fuse3 | 08:39 |
| didrocks | fuse3 | 3.10.5-1 | jammy | source | 08:39 |
| didrocks | fuse3 | 3.10.5-1 | jammy/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x | 08:39 |
| cpaelzer | well, we can wait and re-check on monday for fuse3 | 08:39 |
| didrocks | I would say let’s wait for a few hours and recheck, indeed | 08:39 |
| didrocks | if we still see the mismatch on Monday, we can check with the launchpad team | 08:39 |
| * cpaelzer hopes that DPDK isn't also exposing odd behavior | 08:40 | |
| didrocks | FYI: "fuse3 3.10.5-1 in jammy amd64 remained the same" which matches "fuse3 3.10.5-1 in jammy amd64: main/utils/optional/100% -> main" | 08:40 |
| didrocks | (so, definitively in main already from the launchpad standpoint) | 08:40 |
| cpaelzer | thanks for checking, I'll have a look later and on monday then | 08:40 |
| didrocks | keep me posted! | 08:41 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: did accepting DPDK from new queue and promoting the new binaries cause trouble as well? | 08:50 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: there are a lot of binary packages to check, all done now. Just before accepting, some binary packages are intended for universe, is that correct? librte-meta-event_21.11-1_arm64.deb, librte-meta-all_21.11-1_arm64.deb, librte-meta-net_21.11-1_arm64.deb… Basically all non new ones… Where should they end? | 08:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: box2d [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: box2d [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: box2d [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: box2d [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: box2d [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:15 | |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: yes some binaries are for universe | 09:17 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: ack, I let the default promotions on all new binaries for main and then, if we need to demote, we can | 09:18 |
| didrocks | sounds good to you? | 09:18 |
| cpaelzer | yes that should be ok | 09:20 |
| cpaelzer | thanks didrocks | 09:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [21.11-1] | 09:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [21.11-1] | 09:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpdk [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [21.11-1] | 09:25 | |
| didrocks | yw, done ^ | 09:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: box2d [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (focal-proposed/main) [2.13.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 2.13.5-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server) | 10:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.15.0-0ubuntu3.1 => 2.15.2-0ubuntu1] (core) | 10:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ipmctl [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [03.00.00.0423-1] (no packageset) | 11:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted capnproto [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.8.0-2] | 12:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ipmctl [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [03.00.00.0423-1] | 12:30 | |
| sergiodj | cjwatson: ubuntu-archive: it took more time than I expected, but I dropped armhf from the list of supported arches for kmerresistance, which should unblock kma in -proposed once the old armhf binaries are removed for both packages. could you please do it? | 15:38 |
| cjwatson | sergiodj: done for both | 15:41 |
| sergiodj | cjwatson: thank you | 15:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: astroml [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.0.2~a1-1] (no packageset) | 17:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cpuset (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6-3.1 => 1.6-3.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asdf-coordinates-schemas [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asdf-transform-schemas [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asdf-astropy [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!