| bdmurray | vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/413918 | 00:13 |
|---|---|---|
| jbicha | Eickmeyer: my understanding is that CC-NC cannot be part of universe (or main) but can be in multiverse (or restricted). The Debian equivalent of multiverse is called non-free | 01:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-browserify [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [17.0.0+ds-1] | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] | 08:34 | |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| cpaelzer | re-ping ubuntu-archive for help on DPDK, a few binaries need to move to universe (librte-compress-isal22, librte-compress-octeontx22, librte-crypto-ipsec-mb22) and armhf isn't build anymore (intentionally) hence we need to remove the former binaries on armhf in jammy (update excuses shows both issues) | 09:14 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: doko: ^^ you are the ones I'd expect to be around atm, I beg your pardon but since there was no response over the last day I thought it should be ok to ping you directly | 09:16 |
| doko | cpaelzer, done | 09:18 |
| cpaelzer | thank you doko! | 09:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu4] | 11:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu4] | 11:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: httest (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.4.23-1.2] | 11:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: httest (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.4.23-1.2fakesync1] | 11:37 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, ^^ I don't know if the sync works to avoid now the fakesync | 11:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the rationale for the deletion is now fixed in Debian | 11:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 11:40 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | the idea might be to accept the sync, and then accept the fakesync if the first fails :/ | 11:57 |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | ubuntu-archive: hi, 5.5h back doko did handle DPDK which is stuck in proposed. After the new run excuses now indicates that the demotions I asked for were done. But the removal of old armhf binaries to allow the transition did not happen yet | 14:40 |
| cpaelzer | ubuntu-archive: the new version (inentionally) stopped building armhf binaries, so we'd need to remove the old armhf binaries to let the new version in - could someone of the ubuntu-archive team please do that? | 14:41 |
| cpaelzer | see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#dpdk | 14:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:48 | |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: let me do the removals, those are only those 3 librte-compress-isal22, librte-compress-octeontx22, librte-crypto-ipsec-mb22 on armhf, correct? | 14:56 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: no | 14:56 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: that is what do_ko already did | 14:56 |
| didrocks | ah, all from that source? | 14:56 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: the new version dropped armhf | 14:56 |
| cpaelzer | therefor migration is blocked complaining "no build on armhf" | 14:57 |
| cpaelzer | but since this is not a mistake we need to resolve | 14:57 |
| didrocks | ack, so removing the old ones, do you have a list handy? If not, I can have a look | 14:57 |
| cpaelzer | and IIRC the next step usually was to remove the armhf binaries of the former version | 14:57 |
| didrocks | indeed | 14:57 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: I can create you a list, you can prep the rest | 14:57 |
| didrocks | ack | 14:57 |
| cpaelzer | takes a bit as this has plenty of packages | 14:57 |
| didrocks | indeed :) | 14:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.14] (core) | 15:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.15] (core) | 15:13 | |
| cpaelzer | sorry, mass-distraction | 15:14 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: do you need the .deb names incl version or the binary names? | 15:15 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: just binary name if you can, otherwise, I can list all old armhf binaries if you don’t have time | 15:15 |
| cpaelzer | I'm on it - checking the build log of the old build | 15:15 |
| cpaelzer | that way I should get exactly the right set | 15:16 |
| didrocks | oh build logs, not a bad idea to start from them :) | 15:16 |
| cpaelzer | didrocks: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/T4XbdVfqyB/ | 15:17 |
| cpaelzer | only the armhf versions of those | 15:17 |
| cpaelzer | do you need any :armhf or such on each name to specify that? | 15:18 |
| cpaelzer | I could easily add that to the list | 15:18 |
| cpaelzer | or you do, however you like | 15:18 |
| cpaelzer | and also - thanks a lot in advance | 15:18 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: and done! Thanks for preparing the list :) | 15:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:12.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:8.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 16:01 | |
| cpaelzer | awesome, thanks didrocks | 16:01 |
| cpaelzer | I'll wait for the next full run and look at excuses again then | 16:02 |
| didrocks | cpaelzer: do not hesitate to nag me if anything doesn’t go as expected :) | 16:03 |
| vorlon | xnox: I know at one point you suggested that we should sourcefully remove linux from -proposed before copying new versions there, so that binary cleanups become less of a mess; that clearly hasn't happened. Is that idea DOA? | 16:06 |
| cjwatson | Relatedly, it might be an idea to start using copyPackage(move=True) in sru-release | 16:09 |
| cjwatson | And perhaps also in demote-to-proposed, replacing the separate requestDeletion step | 16:09 |
| === Juan- is now known as Juan | ||
| vorlon | cjwatson: copyPackage(move=true) only changes the semantics of the source pocket, not the dest, right? | 16:49 |
| === unixlab is now known as nicoz- | ||
| === nicoz- is now known as nicoz | ||
| cjwatson | vorlon: Right, it's equivalent to copy-then-delete but without the weird what-if-the-copy-fails case | 17:06 |
| cjwatson | As in, the semantics are that the delete happens if the copy succeeds | 17:07 |
| * vorlon nods | 17:07 | |
| bdmurray | coreycb, icey: these octavia and neutron SRUs are newer than what is in jammy. What is the plan for updating jammy? | 17:15 |
| bdmurray | icey: also with regards to these hirsute uploads are they necessary? hirsute goes EoL next week. | 17:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) | 17:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) | 17:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.5-0ubuntu1] | 17:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.14] | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) | 17:48 | |
| bdmurray | juliank: can you redo your upload of grub2 with -v so both bug numbers appear in X-LP-Bugs-Fixed? | 17:49 |
| bdmurray | Also you could have just use .14 since the package didn't end up in the archive. | 17:50 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: I'll get new jammy snapshots done this week for octavia and neutron | 17:52 |
| juliank | bdmurray it was tagged already :/ | 17:54 |
| juliank | bdmurray: will reupload | 17:54 |
| juliank | Did not want to botch git too much :) | 17:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) | 17:57 | |
| bdmurray | juliank: that's reasonable, thanks! | 17:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.15] (core) | 18:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) | 19:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.15] | 20:15 | |
| laney | hellsworth: heya, (regarding xenial) I think we were still occasionally pushing SRUs out: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xenial-changes/ | 20:18 |
| bdmurray | Steve has indicated they should only be related to the ESM experience IIRC | 20:19 |
| laney | still, if the generator wants to generate appstream for them then it should do so, so it should be kept running | 20:21 |
| hellsworth | laney: ack and thanks :) | 20:33 |
| Eickmeyer | jbicha: Thanks for the info. :) | 20:34 |
| vorlon | juliank: fyi armhf queues going the wrong direction again | 22:20 |
| vorlon | past day or so | 22:20 |
| vorlon | stabbing the workers blindly | 22:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.3.4-0ubuntu1 => 3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 22:40 | |
| icey | bdmurray: the hirsute ones aren't strictly necessary, but I can't upload them to the UCA without doing Hirsute until Hirsute does EoL | 23:32 |
| icey | also: can somebody please reject the Horizon upload to Focal? | 23:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (focal-proposed/universe) [6.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 6.2.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.2.3-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1] | 23:42 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!