[00:13] <bdmurray> vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/413918
[01:10] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: my understanding is that CC-NC cannot be part of universe (or main) but can be in multiverse (or restricted). The Debian equivalent of multiverse is called non-free
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-browserify [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [17.0.0+ds-1]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4]
[09:14] <cpaelzer>  re-ping ubuntu-archive for help on DPDK, a few binaries need to move to universe (librte-compress-isal22, librte-compress-octeontx22, librte-crypto-ipsec-mb22) and armhf isn't build anymore (intentionally) hence we need to remove the former binaries on armhf in jammy (update excuses shows both issues)
[09:16] <cpaelzer> didrocks: doko: ^^ you are the ones I'd expect to be around atm, I beg your pardon but since there was no response over the last day I thought it should be ok to ping you directly
[09:18] <doko> cpaelzer, done
[09:20] <cpaelzer> thank you doko!
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu4]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu4]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: httest (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.4.23-1.2]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: httest (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.4.23-1.2fakesync1]
[11:38] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ I don't know if the sync works to avoid now the fakesync
[11:38] <LocutusOfBorg> the rationale for the deletion is now fixed in Debian
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:57] <LocutusOfBorg> the idea might be to accept the sync, and then accept the fakesync if the first fails :/
[14:40] <cpaelzer> ubuntu-archive: hi, 5.5h back doko did handle DPDK which is stuck in proposed. After the new run excuses now indicates that the demotions I asked for were done. But the removal of old armhf binaries to allow the transition did not happen yet
[14:41] <cpaelzer> ubuntu-archive: the new version (inentionally) stopped building armhf binaries, so we'd need to remove the old armhf binaries to let the new version in - could someone of the ubuntu-archive team please do that?
[14:41] <cpaelzer> see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#dpdk
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:56] <didrocks> cpaelzer: let me do the removals, those are only those 3 librte-compress-isal22, librte-compress-octeontx22, librte-crypto-ipsec-mb22 on armhf, correct?
[14:56] <cpaelzer> didrocks: no
[14:56] <cpaelzer> didrocks: that is what do_ko already did
[14:56] <didrocks> ah, all from that source?
[14:56] <cpaelzer> didrocks: the new version dropped armhf
[14:57] <cpaelzer> therefor migration is blocked complaining "no build on armhf"
[14:57] <cpaelzer> but since this is not a mistake we need to resolve
[14:57] <didrocks> ack, so removing the old ones, do you have a list handy? If not, I can have a look
[14:57] <cpaelzer> and IIRC the next step usually was to remove the armhf binaries of the former version
[14:57] <didrocks> indeed
[14:57] <cpaelzer> didrocks: I can create you a list, you can prep the rest
[14:57] <didrocks> ack
[14:57] <cpaelzer> takes a bit as this has plenty of packages
[14:57] <didrocks> indeed :)
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.14] (core)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.15] (core)
[15:14] <cpaelzer> sorry, mass-distraction
[15:15] <cpaelzer> didrocks: do you need the .deb names incl version or the binary names?
[15:15] <didrocks> cpaelzer: just binary name if you can, otherwise, I can list all old armhf binaries if you don’t have time
[15:15] <cpaelzer> I'm on it - checking the build log of the old build
[15:16] <cpaelzer> that way I should get exactly the right set
[15:16] <didrocks> oh build logs, not a bad idea to start from them :)
[15:17] <cpaelzer> didrocks: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/T4XbdVfqyB/
[15:17] <cpaelzer> only the armhf versions of those
[15:18] <cpaelzer> do you need any :armhf or such on each name to specify that?
[15:18] <cpaelzer> I could easily add that to the list
[15:18] <cpaelzer> or you do, however you like
[15:18] <cpaelzer> and also - thanks a lot in advance
[15:58] <didrocks> cpaelzer: and done! Thanks for preparing the list :)
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:12.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:8.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[16:01] <cpaelzer> awesome, thanks didrocks
[16:02] <cpaelzer> I'll wait for the next full run and look at excuses again then
[16:03] <didrocks> cpaelzer: do not hesitate to nag me if anything doesn’t go as expected :)
[16:06] <vorlon> xnox: I know at one point you suggested that we should sourcefully remove linux from -proposed before copying new versions there, so that binary cleanups become less of a mess; that clearly hasn't happened.  Is that idea DOA?
[16:09] <cjwatson> Relatedly, it might be an idea to start using copyPackage(move=True) in sru-release
[16:09] <cjwatson> And perhaps also in demote-to-proposed, replacing the separate requestDeletion step
[16:49] <vorlon> cjwatson: copyPackage(move=true) only changes the semantics of the source pocket, not the dest, right?
[17:06] <cjwatson> vorlon: Right, it's equivalent to copy-then-delete but without the weird what-if-the-copy-fails case
[17:07] <cjwatson> As in, the semantics are that the delete happens if the copy succeeds
[17:07]  * vorlon nods
[17:15] <bdmurray> coreycb, icey: these octavia and neutron SRUs are newer than what is in jammy. What is the plan for updating jammy?
[17:19] <bdmurray> icey: also with regards to these hirsute uploads are they necessary? hirsute goes EoL next week.
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.5-0ubuntu1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.14]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset)
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset)
[17:49] <bdmurray> juliank: can you redo your upload of grub2 with -v so both bug numbers appear in X-LP-Bugs-Fixed?
[17:50] <bdmurray> Also you could have just use .14 since the package didn't end up in the archive.
[17:52] <coreycb> bdmurray: I'll get new jammy snapshots done this week for octavia and neutron
[17:54] <juliank> bdmurray it was tagged already :/
[17:54] <juliank> bdmurray: will reupload
[17:55] <juliank> Did not want to botch git too much :)
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset)
[17:57] <bdmurray> juliank: that's reasonable, thanks!
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.15] (core)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset)
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.15]
[20:18] <laney> hellsworth: heya, (regarding xenial) I think we were still occasionally pushing SRUs out: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xenial-changes/
[20:19] <bdmurray> Steve has indicated they should only be related to the ESM experience IIRC
[20:21] <laney> still, if the generator wants to generate appstream for them then it should do so, so it should be kept running
[20:33] <hellsworth> laney: ack and thanks :)
[20:34] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Thanks for the info. :)
[22:20] <vorlon> juliank: fyi armhf queues going the wrong direction again
[22:20] <vorlon> past day or so
[22:21] <vorlon> stabbing the workers blindly
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.3.4-0ubuntu1 => 3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[23:32] <icey> bdmurray: the hirsute ones aren't strictly necessary, but I can't upload them to the UCA without doing Hirsute until Hirsute does EoL
[23:32] <icey> also: can somebody please reject the Horizon upload to Focal?
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (focal-proposed/universe) [6.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 6.2.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.2.3-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1]