[00:13] vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/413918 [01:10] Eickmeyer: my understanding is that CC-NC cannot be part of universe (or main) but can be in multiverse (or restricted). The Debian equivalent of multiverse is called non-free [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-browserify [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [17.0.0+ds-1] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted log4cxx [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.12.1-4] === doko_ is now known as doko [09:14] re-ping ubuntu-archive for help on DPDK, a few binaries need to move to universe (librte-compress-isal22, librte-compress-octeontx22, librte-crypto-ipsec-mb22) and armhf isn't build anymore (intentionally) hence we need to remove the former binaries on armhf in jammy (update excuses shows both issues) [09:16] didrocks: doko: ^^ you are the ones I'd expect to be around atm, I beg your pardon but since there was no response over the last day I thought it should be ok to ping you directly [09:18] cpaelzer, done [09:20] thank you doko! [10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu4] [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu4] [11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: httest (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.4.23-1.2] [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: httest (jammy-proposed/primary) [2.4.23-1.2fakesync1] [11:38] vorlon, ^^ I don't know if the sync works to avoid now the fakesync [11:38] the rationale for the deletion is now fixed in Debian [11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:57] the idea might be to accept the sync, and then accept the fakesync if the first fails :/ === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [14:40] ubuntu-archive: hi, 5.5h back doko did handle DPDK which is stuck in proposed. After the new run excuses now indicates that the demotions I asked for were done. But the removal of old armhf binaries to allow the transition did not happen yet [14:41] ubuntu-archive: the new version (inentionally) stopped building armhf binaries, so we'd need to remove the old armhf binaries to let the new version in - could someone of the ubuntu-archive team please do that? [14:41] see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#dpdk [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:56] cpaelzer: let me do the removals, those are only those 3 librte-compress-isal22, librte-compress-octeontx22, librte-crypto-ipsec-mb22 on armhf, correct? [14:56] didrocks: no [14:56] didrocks: that is what do_ko already did [14:56] ah, all from that source? [14:56] didrocks: the new version dropped armhf [14:57] therefor migration is blocked complaining "no build on armhf" [14:57] but since this is not a mistake we need to resolve [14:57] ack, so removing the old ones, do you have a list handy? If not, I can have a look [14:57] and IIRC the next step usually was to remove the armhf binaries of the former version [14:57] indeed [14:57] didrocks: I can create you a list, you can prep the rest [14:57] ack [14:57] takes a bit as this has plenty of packages [14:57] indeed :) [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.14] (core) [15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.15] (core) [15:14] sorry, mass-distraction [15:15] didrocks: do you need the .deb names incl version or the binary names? [15:15] cpaelzer: just binary name if you can, otherwise, I can list all old armhf binaries if you don’t have time [15:15] I'm on it - checking the build log of the old build [15:16] that way I should get exactly the right set [15:16] oh build logs, not a bad idea to start from them :) [15:17] didrocks: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/T4XbdVfqyB/ [15:17] only the armhf versions of those [15:18] do you need any :armhf or such on each name to specify that? [15:18] I could easily add that to the list [15:18] or you do, however you like [15:18] and also - thanks a lot in advance [15:58] cpaelzer: and done! Thanks for preparing the list :) [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:12.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:12.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) [16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:8.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:8.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack) [16:01] awesome, thanks didrocks [16:02] I'll wait for the next full run and look at excuses again then [16:03] cpaelzer: do not hesitate to nag me if anything doesn’t go as expected :) [16:06] xnox: I know at one point you suggested that we should sourcefully remove linux from -proposed before copying new versions there, so that binary cleanups become less of a mess; that clearly hasn't happened. Is that idea DOA? [16:09] Relatedly, it might be an idea to start using copyPackage(move=True) in sru-release [16:09] And perhaps also in demote-to-proposed, replacing the separate requestDeletion step === Juan- is now known as Juan [16:49] cjwatson: copyPackage(move=true) only changes the semantics of the source pocket, not the dest, right? === unixlab is now known as nicoz- === nicoz- is now known as nicoz [17:06] vorlon: Right, it's equivalent to copy-then-delete but without the weird what-if-the-copy-fails case [17:07] As in, the semantics are that the delete happens if the copy succeeds [17:07] * vorlon nods [17:15] coreycb, icey: these octavia and neutron SRUs are newer than what is in jammy. What is the plan for updating jammy? [17:19] icey: also with regards to these hirsute uploads are they necessary? hirsute goes EoL next week. [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) [17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/none) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) [17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openvswitch [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.5-0ubuntu1] [17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.14] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) [17:49] juliank: can you redo your upload of grub2 with -v so both bug numbers appear in X-LP-Bugs-Fixed? [17:50] Also you could have just use .14 since the package didn't end up in the archive. [17:52] bdmurray: I'll get new jammy snapshots done this week for octavia and neutron [17:54] bdmurray it was tagged already :/ [17:54] bdmurray: will reupload [17:55] Did not want to botch git too much :) [17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) [17:57] juliank: that's reasonable, thanks! [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.13 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.15] (core) [19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: and [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-4.2] (no packageset) [20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.15] [20:18] hellsworth: heya, (regarding xenial) I think we were still occasionally pushing SRUs out: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xenial-changes/ [20:19] Steve has indicated they should only be related to the ESM experience IIRC [20:21] still, if the generator wants to generate appstream for them then it should do so, so it should be kept running [20:33] laney: ack and thanks :) [20:34] jbicha: Thanks for the info. :) [22:20] juliank: fyi armhf queues going the wrong direction again [22:20] past day or so [22:21] stabbing the workers blindly [22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (focal-proposed/main) [3:18.3.4-0ubuntu1 => 3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [23:32] bdmurray: the hirsute ones aren't strictly necessary, but I can't upload them to the UCA without doing Hirsute until Hirsute does EoL [23:32] also: can somebody please reject the Horizon upload to Focal? [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.1-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (focal-proposed/universe) [6.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 6.2.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: designate (focal-proposed/main) [1:10.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:10.0.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.2.3-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.3.5-0ubuntu1]