 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448460
 If we are missing a Qt patch, I have no idea what one
 Thanks.
 Would be interesting to see if the same in Debian, but I am not sure anyone will bother with the beta
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: fcitx-qt5 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-1.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: fcitx-qt5 [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-1.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: fcitx-qt5 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-1.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: fcitx-qt5 [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-1.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: fcitx-qt5 [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.2.7-1.1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted fcitx-qt5 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.7-1.1]
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted fcitx-qt5 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.7-1.1]
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted fcitx-qt5 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.7-1.1]
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted fcitx-qt5 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.7-1.1]
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted fcitx-qt5 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.7-1.1]