vorlon | bryceh: "previously we'd disabled these arches in the package's dep8 tests" - where was this disabling done? history on https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/symfony/jammy/armhf shows tests previously passing, and then beginning to fail, with no change in the symfony version number | 00:03 |
---|---|---|
vorlon | bryceh: "upstream lacks 32-bit hardware to reproduce" lame, we aren't running the tests on 32-bit hardware either, they're running in 32-bit containers on 64-bit hardware | 00:06 |
RAOF | utkarsh2102: Oh, also: Is there already an RC bug filed against cmark-gfm in Debian? | 00:07 |
utkarsh2102 | RAOF: there is! | 00:07 |
utkarsh2102 | with a different title but the same thing | 00:07 |
utkarsh2102 | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003964 | 00:07 |
ubottu | Debian bug 1003964 in src:cmark-gfm "cmark-gfm: shlibs too relaxed for unstable ABI" [Grave, Open] | 00:07 |
utkarsh2102 | RAOF: I'll take care of the Debian side of things tomorrow as it's already late for me; 5:40 AM here, heh. | 00:09 |
utkarsh2102 | But that's because I promised cpaelzer that I'll have this unblocked for him this morning. :D | 00:09 |
RAOF | utkarsh2102: Uuuuh. Go to bed! :) | 00:10 |
vorlon | bryceh: your series tasks on LP: #1931913 may have been reversed? | 00:12 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1931913 in shaarli (Ubuntu Impish) "Please drop shaarli (and associated components) from impish" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1931913 | 00:12 |
vorlon | (they ought to all be closed now, anyway) | 00:13 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.36 => 2.664.37] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 00:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fbtftp [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.5-2] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mypy-protobuf [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [3.1.0-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openh264 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.1+dfsg-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openh264 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.1+dfsg-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openh264 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.1+dfsg-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted moviepy [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.0.3-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openh264 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.1+dfsg-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openh264 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.1+dfsg-1] | 00:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openh264 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.1+dfsg-1] | 00:18 | |
utkarsh2102 | vorlon, RAOF: hey, when I upload 0.29.0.gfm.2-1ubuntu.really.0.29.0.gfm.0, LP won't accept it because | 00:31 |
utkarsh2102 | File cmark-gfm_0.29.0.gfm.2.orig.tar.gz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents. | 00:31 |
utkarsh2102 | which is true because I want to roll back the version but it's using the newer orig.tar. How do I deal with this situation? :) | 00:31 |
utkarsh2102 | RAOF: hey, I added a new comment to LP: #1958235 and going to bed now! \o | 00:38 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1958235 in cmark-gfm (Ubuntu) "auto-synced transition to 0.29.0.gfm.2-1 left various packages behind broken" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1958235 | 00:38 |
utkarsh2102 | thank you for your assistance. Take a look at this if you get time^ \o/ | 00:38 |
vorlon | utkarsh2102: 0.29.0.gfm.2~really.0.29.0.gfm.0-0ubuntu1 | 00:45 |
xnox | ubuntu-archive AA https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html looks stuck not sure who can fix it | 02:29 |
xnox | from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt i am confused how come -linux-headers-5.13.0-19/i386 is still published, or why nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 is not migrating | 02:31 |
xnox | apw: i think NBS report is stuck; and i think britney chose not to delete 5.13.0-19-generic kernel fully when migrating v5.15 src:linux | 03:00 |
xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/amd64/linux-headers-5.13.0-19-generic => looks published | 03:01 |
xnox | where as for example https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/amd64/linux-headers-5.15.0-16-generic was deleted | 03:01 |
xnox | it feels like we need to do NBS package removal of src:linux version 5.13.0-19.19 from jammy release. | 03:01 |
xnox | it feels that said phantom kernel is also what is preventing nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 from migrating | 03:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pypy3 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [7.3.7+dfsg-4] (no packageset) | 06:25 | |
cjwatson | xnox: The NBS report is failing with https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/j9yGtGrp7P/, if anyone would care to look | 11:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | hello xnox, can we sync fakeroot maybe? | 12:19 |
LocutusOfBorg | all the patches have been integrated in new upstream release, except for the "Force testsuite on riscv64" change in rules file | 12:19 |
* LocutusOfBorg has merge ready | 12:23 | |
* LocutusOfBorg https://launchpad.net/%7Ecostamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/13213030/+listing-archive-extra | 12:24 | |
=== rafaeldtinoco_ is now known as rafaeldtinoco | ||
=== rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
=== madhens_ is now known as madhens | ||
=== Kamilion|ZNC is now known as Kamilion | ||
=== ubot3 is now known as ubottu | ||
=== OldManWi1ter is now known as OldManWinter | ||
xnox1 | LocutusOfBorg: we do need to force testsuite on ubuntu, because we turn off testsuites by default on riscv64 but that is very bad when fakeroot breaks | 13:04 |
xnox1 | and maybe we need to drop the <!nocheck> annotations? | 13:06 |
xnox1 | or maybe we can just force sync it. | 13:07 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [470.57.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] | 13:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-settings [source] (impish-proposed) [470.57.01-0ubuntu3.1~0.21.10.1] | 13:16 | |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: thank you for rejecting my wrong approach to attack the xen build issues | 13:18 |
cpaelzer | bdmurray: the (now hopefully better) case is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/1958389 now hoping for some support by people with access to the builders and/or doko for the involved binutils | 13:19 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1958389 in xen (Ubuntu) "Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders" [Undecided, New] | 13:19 |
xnox1 | apw: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ all of the 5.13 things in jammy release can be removed that are listed there. Looking into why NBS report doesn't who them. | 13:20 |
xnox1 | however nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 did migrate | 13:21 |
=== xnox1 is now known as xnox | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.1-0ubuntu8~20.04] | 13:22 | |
xnox | sil2100: could you please add easy hint "pycuda nvidia-cuda-toolkit" ? they need to migrate together, but they are not tried to migrate together. | 13:26 |
apw | xnox, linux-aws is at that version? its not NBS | 13:49 |
apw | xnox, it needs rebuilding as it depends on something which is nbs, but not itself nbs | 13:49 |
xnox | apw: i meant the generic & lowlatency 5.13 19.19 kernels. the cloud kernels are still 5.13 in jammy-release | 13:54 |
xnox | apw: where do you see aws? I don't see aws in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | 13:55 |
apw | linux-headers-5.13.0-1005-aws mainlibssl1.1 | 13:55 |
xnox | apw: in the file listings of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ the filenames that are zero in size have no reverse deps. | 13:56 |
xnox | and can be removed. | 13:56 |
xnox | the 1005-aws is not a file name in the NBS dir, and hence it's a real package that is not an NBS one. | 13:57 |
xnox | but in addition to zero length files in that dir, the rest of 5.13.0-19 (the ones that came from src:linux) can go as well, as they simply only depend/reverse-depend from the other leaf src:linux original packages. | 13:58 |
xnox | need to look into fixing the report. | 13:58 |
xnox | one of these state files is tripping up nbs report. | 13:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | xnox, so will you take it or can I merge? | 15:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | I mean, don't we know in some minutes if fakeroot breaks? :) | 15:14 |
xnox | LocutusOfBorg: yes you can merge it | 15:37 |
xnox | well, on riscv64 it's more like hours, and yeah, it was pain | 15:37 |
xnox | cause one couldn't built a working fakeroot | 15:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | ack syncd and merged | 16:01 |
=== sergiodj_ is now known as sergiodj | ||
=== unixlab is now known as nicoz- | ||
bdmurray | paride: Have you verified the fix for bug 1952093? | 18:57 |
ubottu | Bug 1952093 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Focal) "Seeded snaps broken in the Focal dailies" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1952093 | 18:57 |
=== sarnold_ is now known as sarnold |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!